It seems that authentication is probably not set up correctly.
( your log entry -- Multi-Status, 550 ms, /files http-8080-Processor25,
22-Nov-2004 16:04:48, root, PUT, 403 Forbidden, 1251 s, /files)
Does uploading manually (Webdav Explorer, MS Explorer - Webfolders) work for
you ?
Roman
Am
Good stuff James, thanks.
2) Implement a custom Store for Slide to expose your users and roles as
nodes in Slide. You'll need a password property in the Slide namespace
in order for Slide's app server integration to work.
Any detail on what's needed to accomplish this? Would it suffice to
You might be interested in project davenport a CIFS-WebDAV gateway
http://sourceforge.net/projects/davenport/
James Mason wrote:
There a SimpleFileStore (I think it's in 2.1) that should do what you
want. I don't know about searching, since Slide only indexes files when
they're uploaded. This
How does one add annotations for a file that has multiple versions ?
Currently I am able to annotate a file with no version information
without problems, however adding another version for the file gives
403 errors during annotation addition.
http8080-Processor4, 23-Nov-2004 13:37:10, jussiava2,
Take a look at the WCK. There's info on the Slide site and the Wiki. If
the WCK won't work for you (it hasn't been released yet) take a look at
the JNDIPrincipalStore; it's a simplistic implementation that only
provides users and roles with a few properties.
-James
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 10:27
Our application has both tables that we have created and tables from
more than one external application, such a Slide. So how to keep table
names from colliding? One way of course is to create a different
database per section of one's application. Another is for each
creator of tables to assume
I would strongly recommend a table prefix as opposed to a suffix as you
mention at the end of the first paragraph. That was when you list the
tables, all tables for a given app/module are listed together, yet in
alphabetic order. With a suffix, the table names will get dispersed among
the table
Var George,
Yes, thats the thread.
Thanks, hope someone in the Slide project will help.
Richard
Var George wrote:
Richard
Are you talking about the following thread?
http://www.mail-archive.com/slide-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg08307.html
I did all the changes (mostly per Oliver's
Hi all,
We're looking to use slide for a key project and if you have a few moments I
would like to ask a couple of questions:
o In your experience (internal to your company or external) what are the
largest number to concurrent user using Slide?
o Similarly, what are the largest
If you are compiling against 2.1 and not CVS HEAD you will have to
adjust build.properties and comment out
supports.macro.store
as this is not supported in 2.1.
Oliver
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:52:04 -0500, Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded WCK from CVS and
Great summary James. I'll need to reimplement Slide authorization at some
time so this is good information for me too. If I want to reimplement the
entire ACL implementation is there a nice clean interface layer that I can
implement? Will I be able to remove the user store from the process since
I just tried it again with compression turned on, and the result was
only marginally better. This time, the system didn't deadlock completely
until after 63 iterations, whereas before it was closer to 10...
The exceptions seem to look slightly different, too (I don't think I
noticed a
Hi, Oliver,
Thanks a lot for your help. I deleted file
org.apache.slide.store.MacroStore. Modified build.properties. Recompiled.
Got a java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError. (Please see below). What does
this mean?
thanks,
Jane
=
build:
[echo] Building WCK
I have attached my JMeter test case, as well as my test JSPs. populate.jsp is used to populate the repository before running the test. It assumes that the /slide/db/load_test/ folder exists and creates 100 subfolders called user_[i] with 10 documents each. slide.jsp is the page that my JMeter
Attachments made it to the list. Would be great if you could provide a
test case for our test suite as I have no idea how to let your test
run. Anyone else?
Oliver
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:21:06 -0800, Mirko Froehlich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have attached my JMeter test case, as well as my
Hello!
I used WebDAV JCA Connector Jakarta Slide 2.1beta1 in xa-transaction.
Jboss 4.0
webdav-connector-ds.xml:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
connection-factories
tx-connection-factory
jndi-nameWebDAV-Connector/jndi-name
xa-transaction/
rar-namewebdav-2.1b2.rar/rar-name
This looks like some classes are compiled with one JDK which is not
compatible to the one you are using for compilation. I would recommend
building from sources...
Oliver
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:39:16 -0500, Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Oliver,
Thanks a lot for your
Hi,
I am having trouble mapping my lower layer EFS session into WebDavStore. In my
lower layer EFS software, I need to create a session (authenticate user) before
create a folder ,file and do anything else.
For the following method in BasicWebdavStore, should be session be mapped into
Service
I'll take a look at your test suite and see if I can adapt it.
My test requires JMeter. In case you want to try to run it, you should
be able to load the test case as it is. It hits
http://localhost:8080/jmeter_slide/slide.jsp;, which is where my
slide.jsp is deployed (this URL can be changed in
More generally I can say that in Slide 2.1 there are restrictions
concerning the number of concurrent users and the practical size of
collections. Both restrictions have been addressed in the latest Slide
code that eventually will become 2.2.
In detail 2.2 will have much more fain grained locks
Hi,
I have a question regarding the way that content is actually physically
stored in the tx filesystem store. At one time I had thought that the Slide
content in the physical filesystem matched the hierarchy of the folder
structure. Is that not the case anymore or have I accidentally vi done
Did the example work for you? I had the connector running with 3.x.x,
no idea if it works with JBoss 4.0...
Maybe Ryan has more knowledge...
Oliver
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:04:39 +0200, Andrew Tibets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I used WebDAV JCA Connector Jakarta Slide 2.1beta1 in
You have set
parameter name=url-encode-pathtrue/parameter
Remove it and it will be the old behavior.
Oliver
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:26:46 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding the way that content is actually physically
stored in the tx
Hi
Does any one have got the latest Slide 2.1 B2 running under Tomcat 5.5.2
usign J2EEStore?
Ashok
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Oliver. Ok, I will remove it, but I thought that I set that parameter
because it is needed for proper use of UTF-8 urls(??) Is that correct or
have I gotten mixed up? Should I be able to use the Japanese char set
without having this parameter set?
Thanks,
Warwick
-Original
No idea. If it is set, the paths look the way the do. Maybe future
versions of the tx store will allow a more flexible way of encoding
the file name. There already has been a proposal for this...
Oliver
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:03:35 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks
The parameter is passed to the commons transaction FileResourceManager class
and in this class it looks like its encoding the path as a HTTP-safe path. I
don't see why I would need this when writing to the file system. The /
chars shouldn't matter and the URI path passed in should already be in
What does the defer-saving parameter do? I'd like to know if its a
performance enhancement and how it works.
Also I read a while back that it should be disabled in high-load cases as it
could cause deadlocks and so I have it disabled in my domain.xml. But is
this still the case?
Thanks,
Turning it on will make writes faster. Now that the WebDAV layer has
locks it will not be needed when accessing Slide via WebDAV.
Oliver
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:25:34 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the defer-saving parameter do? I'd like to know if its a
performance
Ok thanks. I'll leave it turned off then.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:33 PM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: defer-saving parameter?
Turning it on will make writes faster. Now that
I just could reproduce the problem with the new test case
testsuite/junit/xmltestcases/functional/extra/multi-user/getPut/getPutFolder.xml
and it also exists in the latest sources. It has got something to do
with security and seems to be what Warwick already identified in
Actually I haven't committed the latest transaction deadlock fixes I made to
get the enlistment of slide server transactions into the client's
transaction working. If Mirko is using client side transactions then this
may fix it. And even if he's not it still may fix it :-) But I'm still
waiting
I'm not explicitly using any transactions, unless the webdav client
library transparently uses transactions.
-Mirko
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 16:06, Warwick Burrows wrote:
Actually I haven't committed the latest transaction deadlock fixes I made to
get the enlistment of slide server transactions
Ok, then you aren't using client transactions as you actually need to call
the WebdavResource.startTransaction() interface from somewhere in your
client code for it to use client transactions. But aspects of the fix for
defect 32250 may still apply. For example there were server side issues with
Most of the applications I deal with run with a dedicated database. This
makes management and configuration easier, and allows for finer-grained
performance tuning.
Adding a prefix to the table names shouldn't be too hard, though, and
from the other thread it sounds like almost everything has
You can implement the Security interface to provide your own custom
permission logic. An easier way might be to extend SecurityImpl, or even
ACLSecurityImpl.
Be aware that the WebDAV ACL specification has specific requirements
beyond just how ACLs are evaluated. If all of your security management
My goal would be that when Slide calls to the security implementation to
make an access check that I would replace the authorization piece here with
my own ACL implementation that identifies the incoming user by a username
set in the HTTP request headers by our external security service which
I am trying to the same thing: integrate my content management application
with
webDav with a single sign on.
Reading WCK, it seems that implementing
slide.simple.authentication.SessionAuthenticationManager plus change some
configuration files will do. I am starting too...
Jane
- Original
This is nice to know. Thanks Oliver.
However, are there any actual numbers or data in terms of usage? Forgive me for
asking, but what number (for collections and users) constitutes large vs.
low to medium load and concurrency - also is there an average file size
associated with this
New to Slide/Webdav.
I need to walk through the data store to find and examine each file
currently present. This recursive tree-walker works, but is slow,
specifically in creating a new WebdavResource on the recursive call. Is
there a faster/better way to do this?
Thanks,
Gerald
private
40 matches
Mail list logo
