Re: main branch vs. 2.1 release branch

2004-12-04 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
I never worked with 4.0, so there is nothing 4.1 resolved for me. It just worked. Just try it, you can install it and let it run in half an hour. Oliver On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 18:14:55 -0800, Mirko Froehlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the suggestion, I will definitely try that. Do you

Re: main branch vs. 2.1 release branch

2004-12-04 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
More general: the Slide main branch has new features going in which always tends to reduce stability and things continue to change. Of course in 2005 it will freeze with the first beta and will finally become 2.2. Differences so far are improved concurrency, improved speed for MySQL, timeouts in

Re: developers: table prefix

2004-12-04 Thread Carlos Villegas
Yes, I don't think we need an IoC framework at this point, at least OJB doesn't require it. If it is ok I can take a look at OJB and at least determine how much work it's required, maybe get started setting up the build system and the beginnings of the code. More or less, the following

Re: developers: table prefix

2004-12-04 Thread James Mason
Carlos, If you could start this, it would be great. I'll try to help, but since I've never used OJB don't expect much :). -James On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 01:07 +0900, Carlos Villegas wrote: Yes, I don't think we need an IoC framework at this point, at least OJB doesn't require it. If it is ok I