. If creation of DB is successful then commit the txn of slide.
Hope this will help.
Thanks,
Rakesh
Warwick Burrows wrote:
Yes but there are cases where you need to run a command and then get
information on the object created to store yourself or return to a
caller. For example a lock
Yes but there are cases where you need to run a command and then get
information on the object created to store yourself or return to a
caller. For example a lock gets created on an object and in another
method call within the same transaction we check that the object is
locked before it can
Hi,
Can't you just run the versioncontrolMethod() on each of your files (and
collections if you want) to turn versioning on for them? ie. rather than
reimport all of the data? When we add data to our Slide server we
explicitly control versioning from our client (ie. we have
auto-versioning
, Warwick Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Tony,
Yes the work dir I was referring to is set using the
workpath variable
which is needed for the transactional file stores. Eg. the
stanard tx
file store and the XML file descriptor file store.
Warwick
-Original
, November 18, 2005 12:27 PM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: clustering questions
On 11/18/05, Warwick Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Answers below:
-Original Message-
From: Tony Tomcat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 7:50 PM
Answers below:
-Original Message-
From: Tony Tomcat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 7:50 PM
To: slide-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: clustering questions
I'm in the process of researching the best way to build a
WebDAV system for a large user
Slide 2.1 has a cluster cache listener implemented that keeps the caches
of each Slide consistent in a load-balanced scenario. When a change
comes into one server it notifies the others which then flush their
cache of references to that object. Refer to the Java doc for the
I assume that its only a problem when using MYSQL as the content store
as well as the nodestore. If the content was stored using one of the tx
file stores then you would only be storing the meta data in MYSQL.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hussein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's only one that I know of but its good. WebDAV: Next-generation
Collaborative Web Authoring by Lisa Dusseault.
Of course the protocol itself is not specific enough in a lot of cases
so Lisa lets you know about some of these.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: V K [mailto:[EMAIL
Oh I'm sorry. Its not a book on Slide but on the WebDAV protocol. I
pulled the trigger a little too quickly on my reply :-)
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: V K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:21 AM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Book on
Wow that's great! What version of Slide did you integrate -- or should I
be able to run any version of Slide with JBoss?
Thanks,
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Julien Viet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:53 AM
To: slide-user@jakarta.apache.org
Hey Michael,
If I understand what you're asking for, that is a way to fetch a
property value from the Domain.xml, then the Domain class has a static
function Domain.getParameter() that you can use. You would define your
parameter alongside other parameters like auto-version and
historypath which
The getStore().getParameters() will get you parameters defined on the
stores (eg. DB2 etc) but I think you will want the Domain.getParameter()
method for what you want to do.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Warwick Burrows
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:25 PM
To: Slide Users
, it should be common between DB2 and
Oracle, so can you
provide me with its name?
On 7/13/05, Warwick Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had glossed over this in my previous email, but I
think that the
code that decides what the next history path should be uses
to the fact that you've used up all of the possible
history file slots by exceeding the maximum size of the value that's
stored in next-history-name.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Warwick Burrows
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 10:50 AM
To: Slide Users Mailing List; Muhammad Al Sebaeyie
Hi,
After the PUT message there's a unique constraint exception for the URI
/history/63. This is a very low history entry number for the amount of
data you have in the system. Could it be that the unique ids being used
to create history paths has wrapped around to 0 and is trying to
allocate
,
But how come a document just created gets that low a history number?
and I also checked the logs, this happened for /history/14
and /history/7. And how come if I retry sometimes it works?
On 7/13/05, Warwick Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
After the PUT message there's
The WebdavResource client has implemented the Microsoft tx extensions
eg. startTransaction(), abortTransaction() and commitTransaction()
methods. It takes a timeout for the transaction and a resource parameter
since it locks the resource as part of the process of maintataining the
external
If you intend on using slide only and don't mind catering your code
specifically to it then I have a suggestion :-)
I use the history-collection-hack setting in Domain.xml which puts all
the versions that get created for a file in the same collection in the
/history dir. Knowing the way that it
You might want to check bugzilla as I think this has been fixed
recently. I don't know if the patch was applied to the 2.1 release or
just the slide cvs head.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niklas Gustavsson
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005
guessing this is
not the one
you mean?
Also, looking in the CVS, it looks like it's still not fixed:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-slide/webdavclient/c
lientlib/src/java/org/apache/webdav/lib/WebdavResource.java?re
v=1.36view=markup
/niklas
Warwick Burrows wrote:
You
: startTransaction on a resource in need of escaping
Just compared the 2.1 version with head (from ViewCVS) and
there is no
difference between the two startTransaction methods.
Do you know if this is a new bug in 2.1? Would an old version work?
/niklas
Warwick Burrows wrote:
Hmmm.. I saw
of escaping
Just compared the 2.1 version with head (from ViewCVS) and
there is no difference between the two startTransaction methods.
Do you know if this is a new bug in 2.1? Would an old version work?
/niklas
Warwick Burrows wrote:
Hmmm.. I saw the bug go past and someone suggested
Yeah we did the same as Christopher for our tomcat 4.1.30 deployment.
Now we have recently moved to Jboss 4.0.1 and there _might_ be another
option. I was told, but haven't verified, that you can specify to Jboss
(or is it to the Tomcat 5.x web container underneath Jboss ?) which of
the other
This looks to be the same problem as bug 34910. eg.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34910
Jacob opened this bug for transaction targets with a space in their name but,
as the bug description notes, this indicates the uri encoding is incorrect.
Warwick
-Original
Hi Mark,
How did you mount slide as a network resource? Are you using Windows Explorer
and webfolders or did you use net use to mount a shared drive. I had heard
that the latter was possible but am not sure how to do it with net use. I
also can't find any references in the mail archives.
missing it. Wouldn't it be a performance
improvement to have the locks available immediately? Is there any
downside to processing the lock discovery element at that time?
Thanks,
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Warwick Burrows
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:36 PM
To: Slide Users
You _may_ need to make a lock discovery call before you go to unlock a
file. That will go out to Slide and pick up the list of current locks
for the resource. The locks are kept in the WebdavResource object that
you construct to lock the resource but if you use another WebdavResource
to unlock it
Hi guys,
What is the idea behind the version numbering in Slide (or is it
WebDAV). The versions start at 1.0 and keep incrementing -- never
reaching 2.0 as far as I can tell. When the UPDATE method is used to
select an earlier branch (the closest thing to deleting a revision that
Slide seems to
Hi Anthony,
I vaguely remember that the file must have been created while the
checkin/out-fork parameters are empty for them to affect the file. Ie.
the file is created with whatever the values are in the domain.xml at
the time. Try looking at the properties table (if you use DB nodestore)
to
-rc3
and of /webdavclient/lib/commons-httpclient.jar 2.0-final.
We should unify this (:-)
Stefan
Warwick Burrows wrote:
Hi guys,
What version of the HTTP client does Slide use in the 2.2
release --
which I gather is the current CVS HEAD?
Thanks,
Warwick
Do MS webfolders and other DAV clients support cookies? We want to
authenticate these clients with basic-auth but then our server needs to
store a cookie with the DAV client. Is cookie support standard for DAV
clients since they are essentially HTTP clients?
Thanks,
Warwick
Hi guys,
What version of the HTTP client does Slide use in the 2.2 release --
which I gather is the current CVS HEAD?
Thanks,
Warwick
To my knowledge, no, but there is a program called netdrive that may
do what you want. It's a novell client that talks to the novell webdav
server. I've been told it works with Slide too. I don't have the right
configuration to test it myself at the moment. It seems to use NTLM auth
by default or
But I'm not sure what the license requirements are to use netdrive
though. I can't find source for it on the net so it may need a license
if you intend to use it for more than your personal use :-) Or at least
it needs to be investigated.
-Original Message-
From: Warwick Burrows
Hi Andrey,
Excuse my ignorance, but in simple terms what is the protocol underlying
digest auth? Does WebFolders actually implement the client piece of the
authentication mechanism? I'm trying to understand how sophisticated a
web client WebFolders is and whether it is actively participating in
now.
-James
Warwick Burrows wrote:
Hi Carlos,
I definitely think its worth it. How were you thinking
of indexing
this second table? The way to uniquely identify any individual
property in the property table seems to require 3 fields --
property namespace, property
name
Oops. I should have finished reading your email. The OJB changes will
definitely require data migration then... What kind of changes are we
talking about?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Warwick Burrows
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:03 PM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Thanks very much!
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Shulinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:16 PM
To: 'Slide Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: AW: accessing slide on the server side
Hi, Warwick!
Excuse my ignorance, but in simple terms what is
I believe this was a design choice to allow connections to be reused
(persistent connections) rather than opening/closing a connection on
every DAV method call. For example I have one webdavresource per thread
and reuse the webdavresource by making use of the setPath() command to
change the
John, do you use client side transactions?
Thanks,
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: John Rousseau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 10:50 AM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Experiences with WebDAV Construction Kit
I used the WCK to put a
I meant restrict in terms of both :-) And you're right in that I do need
the /history path to be visible to users so they can see pervious
revisions so I need to use access control to manage this path. We use a
secure web proxy application that junctions web webapps to itself and
access control
I don't know why it was done this way originally but I think I saw a
submission to the slide head branch that said something to the effect
that this restriction had been removed. So if you need to delete the
versions then you will be able to do this with a build from the head.
I had the same
Hi,
Is there any reason that I shouldn't be able to restrict client access
to every directory under /slide other than files. For instance I don't
want the client to see /history or /actions or /users. Does the client
ever need access to any of these paths for a legitimate reason or can
the
Hi guys,
Up until now I have had the authentication/security features of Slide
disabled. Now that I have to come to play with making use of users I'm
having a problem after slide server restart with loading users from the
db. The users were created using the auto-create-mechanism and were
PM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: UserRoleImpl missing 4 param constructor?
Previously, I used SubjectNode as the role and now
UserRoleImpl has this ctor.
Oliver
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:27:01 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Up until now I
, no matter what size we use, Slide will
run out of
memory. As I said before, this is a problem we will solve be a daily
restart
of Slide.
/Pontus
-Original Message-
From: Warwick Burrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 3:18 AM
To: 'Slide Users Mailing
not reading though.
From: Warwick Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Slide Users Mailing List slide-user@jakarta.apache.org
To: 'Slide Users Mailing List' slide-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: Performance issues, Slow Downs
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:03:08 -0800
Jeff,
Excuse my ignorance
Karl,
I don't want to sound negative but this sounds like a very difficult problem
to solve since its your webdav client, mac os x, that wants to put the ._
files in there and expects them to be there when it requests them. If they
do contain metadata then it suggests that mac os x will want to
Jeff,
Excuse my ignorance but what are the clustered indexes you mention creating
on certain tables? I'm hitting -911 database errors (deadlocks and or lock
contention timeouts) with the Slide 2.1 release and am trying to find out
how to improve Slide's DB2 table access performance.
Thanks,
Pontus,
If you have delta-v versioning enabled then it may help to use the history
collection hack that basically distributes you're file revision structure
in a hierarchical tree in the /history path in the file system
irrespective of how you choose to layout the files under the /files path.
You can fetch the version-set property on the resource to get the list of
versions (VHRs or version history records) but the set is not always ordered
from earliest to latest, etc. You may need to sort it to ensure the right
order and so be able to choose what the previous version to the current.
: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 3:49 AM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: A few webdav client locking concerns
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:49:11 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. Transaction locks are being stored
Hi,
I'm running into some more client-transaction problems and have been looking
at the webdav client. I've noticed a couple of issues and want to air them
to see if anyone familiar with the DAV spec locking agrees or disagrees with
what I see:
1. Is it valid in the spec for a list of locks to
slide
servers of /history path updates that stem from the change even though
/history isn't specifically configured as the base-uri?
Thanks,
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: James Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:40 PM
To: Warwick Burrows; Slide Users
Hi John,
I made a submission to the HEAD to fix external transaction support last
night. If you are using client-side transactions then this may have
introduced the problem but it is working in the Slide 2.1 release currently.
To be using client-side transactions you would be calling the
Bernd,
Slide's WebDAV client creates a lock-null resource when you lock a file that
doesn't exist and that you want to create. This is how the WebDAV standard
deals with two uploads of the same new file at the same time. When the
second server tries to lock the resource they will be denied with
John, thanks for the fix! Would you mind opening a bug for this in bugzilla
so we can be sure that this fix isn't overlooked? And we can be sure a
committer will look at it. Here's a link to the Slide open bug page:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Slide
Thanks,
As Tim has noted the correct approach for you is to either disable
auto-versioning altogether and do both checkout and checkin yourself; or
there is an auto-versioning configuration that automatically checks out for
you but will leave the file checked out for you to checkin manually.
Assuming of
like in
Slide.
Carlos
Warwick Burrows wrote:
There's something about preprocessing Java source that makes me a
little
uneasy :-) Isn't there another way? eg. instead of inserting a
placeholder
that gets replaced simply change the jdbc operation
strings passed
it, specially if there are no stored procedures like in
Slide.
Carlos
Warwick Burrows wrote:
There's something about preprocessing Java source that
makes me a
little uneasy :-) Isn't there another way? eg. instead of
inserting a placeholder that gets replaced simply
.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Tim Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 11:07 AM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: example for versioning
Warwick,
Would you be able to expand on the following statement for me?
Warwick Burrows wrote
working resource for a checkout and keep a user's modifications separate
until they checkin?
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 2:04 PM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: example for versioning
Warwick
There's something about preprocessing Java source that makes me a little
uneasy :-) Isn't there another way? eg. instead of inserting a placeholder
that gets replaced simply change the jdbc operation strings passed to the
jdbc client as in this example?
select name from +
, for example, is straightforward, we have done it, specially if
there are no stored procedures like in Slide.
Carlos
Warwick Burrows wrote:
There's something about preprocessing Java source that makes me a
little uneasy :-) Isn't there another way? eg. instead of
inserting
The webdav client methods take a depth parameter which can be 0, 1 or
infinite. When you specify 0 the operation works on the target alone. 1
indicates target and immediate children and infinite to operate on the
target and all children. Of course they really only apply when the target is
a
Hi,
I've been working with the webdav client transaction methods and wanted to
confirm something about their use and also potentially pass on some useful
information to others who intend to use them. The startTransaction and
endTransaction (the latter called by commitTransaction and
Is there a performance gain when you use a single WebdavResource object per
thread and reuse it to access different resources on the same Slide server?
ie. if there is only one WebdavResource then is there only one HTTP
connection to the Slide server across which all requests flow no matter what
What are the standard MS client transactions you're talking about?
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Villegas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 6:22 PM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: MKACTIVITY and transactions
Hi,
I was reading in
I don't know if you can change the version numbering. There is code in the
jdbc store adapters that seems to assume that revision numbers take a
certain format. I modified one usage of this in the DB2 store to make the
file revision branching work but am pretty certain the other jdbc stores
will
in your operating system. I did some
testing with
russian filenames and it only worked when this parameter was
set to true.
/jacob
- Original Message -
From: Warwick Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Slide Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11
We've implemented that configuration: a jdbc nodestore with tx filesystem
store much like you've outlined with a HTTP load balancer between our DAV
clients and Slide servers. It is untested in this target (load balanced)
configuration but we have tested in a simpler configuration that shares the
Great work Oliver! I'll grab that fix too. You can never have too many
deadlock fixes, I always say ;-)
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 5:46 AM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: major deadlock
, then the clustering implementation
with its dependence on JGroups would have to be compiled and loaded.
Example usages:
JBoss uses JGroups.
CJDBC uses JGroups.
Richard
Warwick Burrows wrote:
We've implemented that configuration: a jdbc nodestore with tx
filesystem store much
FileResourceManager per directory. If this holds
true then
even disabling
all caches does not guarantee atomic operations on files, ie file
transactions are not reliable.
Warwick Burrows wrote:
We've implemented that configuration: a jdbc nodestore with tx
filesystem store much like
Great summary James. I'll need to reimplement Slide authorization at some
time so this is good information for me too. If I want to reimplement the
entire ACL implementation is there a nice clean interface layer that I can
implement? Will I be able to remove the user store from the process since
Hi,
I have a question regarding the way that content is actually physically
stored in the tx filesystem store. At one time I had thought that the Slide
content in the physical filesystem matched the hierarchy of the folder
structure. Is that not the case anymore or have I accidentally vi done
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:26:46 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding the way that content is actually
physically stored in the tx filesystem store. At one time I had
thought that the Slide content in the physical filesystem
matched
the way the do. Maybe
future versions of the tx store will allow a more flexible
way of encoding the file name. There already has been a
proposal for this...
Oliver
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:03:35 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Oliver. Ok, I will remove
What does the defer-saving parameter do? I'd like to know if its a
performance enhancement and how it works.
Also I read a while back that it should be disabled in high-load cases as it
could cause deadlocks and so I have it disabled in my domain.xml. But is
this still the case?
Thanks,
that the WebDAV
layer has locks it will not be needed when accessing Slide via WebDAV.
Oliver
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:25:34 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the defer-saving parameter do? I'd like to know if its a
performance enhancement and how it works
Actually I haven't committed the latest transaction deadlock fixes I made to
get the enlistment of slide server transactions into the client's
transaction working. If Mirko is using client side transactions then this
may fix it. And even if he's not it still may fix it :-) But I'm still
waiting
client library transparently uses transactions.
-Mirko
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 16:06, Warwick Burrows wrote:
Actually I haven't committed the latest transaction
deadlock fixes I
made to get the enlistment of slide server transactions into the
client's transaction working. If Mirko
won't need Slide to implement
the ACL spec.
-James
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 09:19 -0800, Warwick Burrows wrote:
Great summary James. I'll need to reimplement Slide
authorization at
some time so this is good information for me too. If I want to
reimplement the entire ACL implementation
I recently dropped a defect fix against 2.1b2 for a DB2 client deadlock that
was not specific to DB2. The problem was that the server has its own
transaction support but some of the operations it was performing on the db
weren't being enlisted to the current server trasaction. The defect number
But wasn't the original problem that the new content could not be seen
because it wasn't originally inserted through the cache but directly into
the tables? If so only turning the cache off altogether will help.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi guys,
I'd like to ask those who know/use/care about the WebDAV client transaction
support to sanity check some fixes I've made to Slide (client and server) to
get transaction continuation from the client to the server working. I've
submitted the patch deltas to bugzilla along with defect
Tim,
The response document is available as an org.w3c.dom.Document from all of
the raw *Method classes (eg. checkinMethod and checkoutMethod class) as they
extend the XMLResponseMethodBase class which has a getResponseDocument()
method that returns it. So you certainly could save the response
and communicating with the backend
involves no I/O. Setting a high verbosity level on the backend will
affect performance, of course, because of the higher output to the
console or file.
Carlos
Warwick Burrows wrote:
I don't understand the relationship between this setting
and those
There's one usage of it in the command-line client (CLI) that I can see and
the help message for it is:
create a new versioncontrolled resource at path based on history URL
It may be used to restore a file to your content space that was previously
deleted. History files aren't removed
You will need to have an existing history URI (VHR) to use the two param
method. It must be a URI to a VHR under the /history path. Since you haven't
been able to version control any resources you probably don't have a valid
history URI to call this method with and that's why the conflict error
Stefan,
How does the logger-level setting in Domain.xml control the actual logging
output? Can the logger-level be set in the log4j.properties instead? I'd
like to control the verbosity of output from log4j from within the
log4j.properties which is currently reread dynamically from the classes
You may need to copy the log4j-1.2.8.jar file from your Slide dist to
tomcat/common/lib.
I can't say for sure that this is the problem though as I have other logger
load problems right now and can't verify it myself :-)
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Andy Bowes [mailto:[EMAIL
verbosity in
log4j.properties.
e.g. to set the general level to INFO but for a special
package to DEBUG log4j.rootCategory=INFO,stdout,R
log4j.category.org.apache.slide.index.lucene=DEBUG
Stefan
Warwick Burrows wrote:
Stefan,
How does the logger-level setting in Domain.xml control
?
Oliver
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:52:52 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I've just added transaction support into my WebDAV client based app
using the WebdavResource transaction methods. But I'm getting a db2
deadlock during the commit phase of a client transaction
This deadlock _could_ be due to defect 31907 that I have seen and fixed for
DB2. The fix was in non-DB2 specific modules so it may fix this issue too.
The problem was due to the same thread attempting to make two sql calls but
not within the same transaction. The transaction code at the start of
Hi guys,
Does anyone have any information on whether WebFolders will work with the
Briefcase or with offline files. Right clicking on a shared folder will
let you choose to enable the use of offline files in the share but the same
is not an option when right clicking on a web folder.
I
Anyone else with hung Slide 2.1b2 servers?
There's the jdbc store hang I just fixed, and there is still the possibility
of a jdbc hang for users who have the access control enabled. The basic
problem with this deadlock was that the transaction had locked access to a
table for the length of the
Oliver,
The solution is to replace the calls to
org.apache.slide.common.Namespace.getUri(String) in both hasPermission()
methods in SecurityImpl.java with the companion method from the same class
getUri(SlideToken, String). The safest option is to replace all getUri()
calls in this way so that
Guys,
There was another email thread like this recently regarding a users need to
have the read bit on a folder to navigate through it to get to children. I
worked on an authorization product at one time and our solution was to
define another permission called traverse that would permit a user
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
