Re: [SLUG] What about /boot [was] Swap = 2xRAM

2007-03-01 Thread Simon Wong
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 14:54 +1100, Zhasper wrote: I think there's a bit more utility than that in at least making /home it's own partition: Totally agree for your reasons provided. Problem is that it's not a newbie task to create a separate home partition nor to choose what size the rest

Re: [SLUG] What about /boot [was] Swap = 2xRAM

2007-02-27 Thread Zhasper
On 28/02/07, Howard Lowndes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Going slightly OT, but is the /boot partition necessary any longer. IIRC, this is bios-dependent. Newer bioses don't have this limitation. cf http://www.enterprisedt.com/publications/dual_boot.html#1024,

Re: [SLUG] What about /boot [was] Swap = 2xRAM

2007-02-27 Thread Glen Turner
Howard Lowndes wrote: Going slightly OT, but is the /boot partition necessary any longer. Wasn't that a method of getting around the boot must be in the first 1023 cyl limit? It's not necessary, since the limit doesn't exist on modern machines. There's no reason for it to be the default in an

Re: [SLUG] What about /boot [was] Swap = 2xRAM

2007-02-27 Thread Zhasper
On 28/02/07, Glen Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The One True Partitioning scheme is / :-) Seriously, for a single-spindle machine I wouldn't stuff about with partitioning unless you want to encrypt your home directory with dm_crypt. I think there's a bit more utility than that in at