Re: [SLUG] Website

On 21/09/15 12:00, James Gray wrote: ... give ye olde web page a shot in the arm? ... Here is my attempt to remove the bits from the Slug website which don't work and put in simple links to the bits which do work. The result is not pretty, but at least it should work:

Re: [SLUG] slug Digest, Vol 115, Issue 3

+1 From: Marghanita da Cruz > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:16:31 +1000 > Subject: Re: [SLUG] Website > Hi All, > > How about a hackfest of the website at the SLUG meeting on Friday evening. > > Who has the passwords? Do we have to recover them? > > Marghanita -- SLUG -

Re: [SLUG] Wiki suggestions?

I think there is an "edit source" option somewhere there, if you insist on text syntax. Personally I find its WYSIWYG interface pretty convenient, compared to the rare times that I find myself correct entries on Wikipedia. On 3 Oct 2015 6:09 pm, "James Gray" wrote: > I

Re: [SLUG] Website

I would be happy to put something simple and functional together. Who is the contact looking after the website and the hosting currently? On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:00 PM, James Gray wrote: > Is "deterioration" a kinder way of saying "neglect"? ;) > > Well, we *can *moan and

Re: [SLUG] slug Digest, Vol 115, Issue 1

I'd say it needs a new sponsor/organiser. I was not able to make the last meeting so wasn't able to raise the issue at the meeting. 1. Did anyone raise the issue? 2. If so, was there a resolution to the issue? Any information appreciated :) Patrick > -- Forwarded message -- >

[SLUG] Email delays [ was Re: Website ]

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:36:20AM +1000, David wrote: > Received: from slug-vm.linux.org.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by > lists.slug.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5A6C51C1; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 > 16:52:07 +1000 (AEST) > X-Original-To: slug@slug.org.au > Delivered-To: slug@slug.org.au > Received:

Re: [SLUG] Website

> On 3 Oct 2015, at 10:00 am, slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote: > > > Not a great advertisement for Linux in Sydney :( > > Whoever is looking after the website, isn't. Does SLUG need a new website > sponsor? or is the organisation passed it's use by date? T'would be a pity > indeed. > > David