On Saturday, September 18, 2004, 11:22:02 PM, Matt wrote:
M Thanks Pete, but let me just stress the largest issue that I see and I
M think you already are aware of it. The new IP classification is the
M most likely to produce false positives and it's result code of 60 places
M precedence of that
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've actually been thinking very strongly of reorganizing the rule group IDs
recently. Especially in light of the new changes we've made with robots et
al. The accuracy of the Experimental IP group has gone up considerably -
Title: Sniffer misses NIGERIAN type spams
Pete, I am wondering why Sniffer has such a problem detecting the so-called NIGERIAN types of spam. It seems that I have been forwarding several of them daily to the spam@ address for weeks, but Sniffer still consistently misses them. There must be
On Sunday, September 19, 2004, 10:11:27 AM, Landry wrote:
LW Pete, I am wondering why Sniffer has such a problem detecting
LW the so-called NIGERIAN types of spam. It seems that I have been
LW forwarding several of them daily to the spam@ address for weeks,
LW but Sniffer still consistently
