RE: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

2004-10-26 Thread John W. Enyart
Pete, 2-3.0i9 seems to be fine for me. John - John W. Enyart EAI, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 7:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about

RE: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

2004-10-26 Thread Mark E. Smith
Since we've been running it our Queue monitors have stopped alerting. This is a good thing as that means the queues are no longer hitting 100% between 5 min. sample periods. So, me thinks it's pretty well optimized now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

2004-10-26 Thread Pete McNeil
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 11:03:45 AM, Glenn wrote: GB can you send the link to this again http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Betas/MessageSniffer2-3.0i9-Distribution.zip There you go, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

2004-10-26 Thread Nick Justice
Do we have a timetable for this new release Sorry cant afford time to beta test! I do get alarmed at the huge .snf file at around 14 meg for my personal rule base.. Is this optimised in any way or will continue to grow? _Nick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re[4]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

2004-10-26 Thread Pete McNeil
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 7:02:53 PM, Nick wrote: NJ Do we have a timetable for this new release Sorry cant afford NJ time to beta test! The current interim version will be republished as the official release tonight. There will be no changes other than re-tagging the build info. NJ I