Re: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Pete McNeil
On Monday, June 6, 2005, 5:13:19 PM, Jim wrote: JM Is anyone else seeing a huge rash of spam/virus messages in JM the last hour or so?  I have multiple users that are getting JM messages that are forging our own addresses and have a link that JM appears to go to our website but instead goes

RE: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message I'm seeing what Scott sees, but the payload is an encrypted zip. VirusTotal.com says: This is a report processed by VirusTotal on 06/06/2005 at 23:40:17 (CET) after scanning the file "DBB05F6330082B871.SMD" file. Antivirus Version Update Result

Re: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Nick Hayer
Was this the ip? 209.67.220.164 This is the only address I have seen - -Nick Scott Fisher wrote: Yes I have seen them too: email starts with: Dear Valued Member, According to our site policy you will have to confirm your account by the following link or else

Re: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Jim Matuska
That's the one I am seeing too. Jim Matuska Jr.Computer Tech2, CCNANez Perce TribeInformation Systems[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Nick Hayer To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:42 PM Subject: Re: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

RE: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Dave Koontz
Same exact IP here! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick HayerSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 5:42 PMTo: sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: Re: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus? Was this the ip? 209.67.220.164 This is the only address I have seen - -Nick Scott Fisher

Re[2]: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Pete McNeil
On Monday, June 6, 2005, 5:50:38 PM, Dave wrote: DK Same exact IP here! We've got a couple of rules for this now -- making the rounds as new compiles go out. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to

Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Jim Matuska
Thanks Pete, What Return code will this be under? Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dave Koontz sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:00 PM Subject:

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Dave Marchette
New target ip: 205.138.199.146 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Matuska Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:01 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus? Thanks Pete, What Return code will this be under?

Re[4]: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Pete McNeil
One rule (369660) will code to 53 (scams). Another (369650) will code to 53 (scams). Another (369634) also codes to 53 (scams). The rules got the scam tag because it presents like a phishing scam. I'll be watching for evidence of additional polymorphism and we will adapt. Now that we know this

Re[4]: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Pete McNeil
New rule - 369676 under Malware. New experimental rule on message structure: 369677 _M On Monday, June 6, 2005, 6:13:23 PM, Dave wrote: DM New target ip: 205.138.199.146 DM -Original Message- DM From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Matuska DM Sent:

Re: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Matt
FYI, This virus appears to be using multiple forms of infection. One seems to link to the IP where you are prompted to run/download the infected program and the others have infected attachments in the E-mail itself. Based on reviewing my logs and spam capture file, it appears that initially

RE: [sniffer] New Spam/Virus?

2005-06-06 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM%5FMYTOB%2EDV http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the virus that I was seeing. The one that Jim and others are seeing may be this MyTob, whose description was