Re: [sniffer] Sniffer Speed Issue

2005-10-13 Thread Pete McNeil
On Thursday, October 13, 2005, 12:15:23 PM, Orillia wrote: OPA Hi everyone. Background. Running IMail 8.15HF2, Declude 1.82 and sniffer. OPA Using P4, 512MB RAM with about 400 thousand messages a day. The employee who OPA used to manage this has left the company and I am now the owner and

Re: [sniffer] POP

2005-10-13 Thread Computer House Support
Hi Pete, I don't believe that I received an answer to my question (below) Thank you. Dear Pete, Are we ready to switch to the POP method of submitting spam, or are we waiting for an official announcement/instructions from you? Mike Stein Computer House www.computerhouse.com This

Re: [sniffer] POP Approach

2005-10-13 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, October 12, 2005, 5:03:44 PM, support wrote: s Dear Pete, s Are we ready to switch to the POP method of submitting spam, or are we s waiting for an official announcement/instructions from you? Anyone can switch to this method at any time. Our current policy is to ask anyone who

Re[2]: [sniffer] POP Approach

2005-10-13 Thread Pete McNeil
Yes, this is correct. Most of the time the login is the same as the email address and this helps us easily recognize sources. We simply need to know the login information and how the messages will arrive at the address so that we can properly classify the messages we pull from there. _M On

Re[2]: [sniffer] POP Approach

2005-10-13 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, October 12, 2005, 6:30:45 PM, William wrote: WVH Pete, WVH Was just wondering, I have all of my e-mail pass through an IMGate/Postfix WVH machine prior to hitting my main mail server. Sometimes, e-mail (especially WVH spam) gets forwarded from the secondary MX as well. If we use