Re: [sniffer]Sniffer updates down?

Hi John, I got my Sniffer update at 5:03 pm no problem from Toronto Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 5:23 PM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject

[sniffer]Ebay Phishing Emails getting through

and the SANE Security database. Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions Tel: 416 322-0333 -Original Message- From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 10:33 AM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer]Re[2]: [sniffer

RE: Re[4]: [sniffer] When to go persistent

the instances read the file off disk so there is no problem. With the persistent instance this is not the case and I would like to know that it really is using the newest rulebase. Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

[sniffer] When to go persistent

Hi, Is there any good rule of thumb, in terms of messages processed per minute/hour/day when you should move to a persistent instance of Sniffer? Thank you Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription

RE: [sniffer] When to go persistent

Andrew, So when you went to persistent it lowered the stress on your already stressed hardware? And I see that Pete has responded as I write this with: Use it Well I will set it up and see how my system reacts. Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] When to go persistent

? That way the first time it is called that instance will go persistent and all the rest will end up talking to it? Regardless of how the persistent instance is started should I have the persistent keyword on the line that is called from Declude? Goran Jovanovic This E-Mail came from

RE: [sniffer] What is this file

Thank you that is great. Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 3:08 PM To: Goran Jovanovic Subject: Re: [sniffer] What is this file On Thursday

RE: Re[4]: [sniffer] Bad Rule - 828931

I just ran the grep command on my log and I got 850 hits. Now is there a way to take the output of the grep command and use it pull out the total weight of corresponding message from the declude log file, or maybe the subject? Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message

RE: Re[4]: [sniffer] Bad Rule - 828931

it. Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 8:39 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: RE: Re[4]: [sniffer] Bad Rule - 828931 I just ran

RE: [sniffer] Stock SPAM now HTML

Will it ever stop :( Probably not. Actually maybe I shouldn't be wishing that SPAM stops because then I would lose a revenue streamhmm conundrum Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Stock SPAM now HTML

extra static filters to pop the older text only stock spam above my delete weight. This combined image/text is going to make it tougher I think. Thoughts? Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete

[sniffer] Stock SPAM now HTML

; CORP. br Syimg src="" br Price $img src="" br Shares out: img src="" Million br Market Capitimg src="" Million br Significant Revenue Growth iimg src="" br Averagimg src="" br Rating: Stroimg src="" Buy br 7 days t

[sniffer] The SPAM bots?

Hi, Are the bots working again? I am seeing a number of the STOCK pitches coming through (the ones that use the picture attachment eg. tdimg border=0 alt= src=cid:a8c0936faa69131141800cf3347d17a4/td) Sniffer did not catch the message and I have forwarded it to SPAM@ Thanx Goran Jovanovic Omega

RE: [sniffer] The SPAM bots?

Thanks Pete, I think I am seeing a slowdown of this type of SPAM getting through now. Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 7:20 PM To: Goran Jovanovic

[sniffer] Hit Rate Discrepancy

Processed: 12,685 So am I interpreting the Sniffer log correctly? Do I need to worry about the Match entries? Thanx Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] RAID Levels for Spool Folder

Matt and Charles, Thank you for your insight and comments. Now I just have to go and get the money to get something that I want :) Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go

RE: [sniffer] Moving Sniffer to Declude/SmarterMail

is broken into many smaller writes along with the data protection/CRC info and then those writes are written to different drives. It seems to me that it should be faster to do a bunch of small writes rather than 1 big write. What am I missing? Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe This E-Mail

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Moving Sniffer to Declude/SmarterMail

be substantial. Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 11:43 AM To: Goran Jovanovic Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Moving Sniffer to Declude/SmarterMail

RE: [sniffer] RAID Levels for Spool Folder

which have a lot of read/write are on a different volume/channel from the other log files. I am not sure what amount of space you should allocate to a server that would process 100,000+ messages a day? Anyone have comments on this config. Thanx Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe