[sniffer] Re: Bad Rule: 1604021

2007-10-16 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Thanks for reporting this, Pete! My numbers were more extreme than Pi-Web's. That bad rule triggered on 18,023 messages yesterday. Due to the rest of my spam software, two-thirds were either passed (as presumed ham) or deleted (as very spammy). So the one-third that was held, I re-scanned

[sniffer] Re: Bad Rule: 1604021

2007-10-15 Thread Pi-Web - Frank Jensen
Hi Pete, We have fileret out 169 mails based on this rule. Most are spam. I have just collected the latest rulebase - it is from 20.00, The false positive are still taken as spam. If you want the 169 please let me know. --22:37:49-- http://www.sortmonster.net/Sniffer/Updates/xx.snf

[sniffer] Re: Bad Rule: 1604021

2007-10-15 Thread Pi-Web - Frank Jensen
Hi Pete, Checked all manuelly, 7 of 155 was good. The new rule database don't match on any of the 7. All 155 is matched as spam. Monday, October 15, 2007, 4:43:03 PM, you wrote: Hi Pete, We have fileret out 169 mails based on this rule. Most are spam. That's good to hear. Thanks! _M