I'm currently running Sniffer via Declude and use
MDLP. Great!
Since all the talk about invURIBL on the Imail list I
thought I'd give it a try. The only problem I have is that it doesn't seem
to be compatible with MDLP.
invURIBL assigns its own weight to each message. The
global.cfg line
ckholes.us
- Original Message -
From:
Joe Wolf
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 11:05
AM
Subject: [sniffer] Sniffer, MDLP, and
invURIBL?
I'm currently running Sniffer via Declude and use
MDLP. Great!
Since all the talk about invURIBL on
MDLP to
ignore it as well."
Andrew
8)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
WolfSent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 9:05 AMTo:
sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: [sniffer] Sniffer, MDLP, and
invURIBL?
I'm currently running Sniffer via Declu
, 2006 12:35
PM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Sniffer, MDLP, and
invURIBL?
Joe,
Are you using MDLP to autotune your weights in
Declude? If so, you can exclude invURIBL and other tests which you don't
want to change, whether because you think the weight is perfect, or because
On Saturday, February 25, 2006, 1:38:53 PM, Joe wrote:
JW
JW
JW I would actually prefer that MDLP autotune the weight for
JW invURIBL, but since the weights are managed by invURIBL and not
JW Declude I don't know how this will work.
I'm not familiar enough with invURIBL to know how it is
