On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 12:01:32 PM, Darin wrote:
DC I thought we were supposed to just forward these as attachments to the spam@
DC address?
We're trying to move away from that :-)
poping the messages is more scalable.
_M
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For
On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 1:12:18 PM, Dan wrote:
DH That helps to tune the overall rulebase, but this tunes MY rulebase to
DH the types of spam that we receive. If I send it to the spam@ address it
DH may or may not get added to the rulebase. Done this way, I KNOW it is
DH going to be added
On Wednesday, July 20, 2005, 12:05:29 PM, John wrote:
JC Thanks, that helps a lot. Didn't understand the replace nonzero with the
JC weight number in the Global file.
Minor correction...
Actually -- you replace nonzero with the result code.
You adjust the weights at the end of the line as
My bad. Trying to multi-task isn't working today. :-)
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:13 AM
To: John Carter
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Declude and Sniffer
On Wednesday, July 20, 2005
