On Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 1:44:30 PM, Jim wrote:
JM Pete,
JM Is there a possibility of setting up another return code for
JM situations such as this such as a blacklist rulecode that only has
JM rules for messages such as these that should be blacklisted
JM immediately. I wouldn't mind setting
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 11:54 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] New Spam Storm
On Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 1:44:30 PM, Jim wrote:
JM Pete,
JM Is there a possibility of setting up another return code for
JM situations such as this such as a blacklist rulecode that only has
JM rules for messages
On Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 6:06:00 PM, Rick wrote:
RR I've sure been seeing it. My db updates are triggered off email update
RR notices from sniffer, so I know I have the latest.
RR Feels like something's gone wrong with sniffer due to the year change.
We are definitely experiencing a spam
On Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 6:13:24 PM, Matt wrote:
M I've noted that dictionary attack type spam is generally of this
M variety, and while you are probably blocking a great deal of this, the
M sheer volume makes it look like you aren't doing that well against it.
M I've also noted that the
