It is helpful to get the full headers, however it is simpler and more reliable
in most cases to simply forward the message.
_M
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 4:46:48 AM, Kevin wrote:
KR Can we just forward them regularly or do we need to change anything
KR about how the headers display when we
We attempt to create reliable rules no matter what language we see, however it
is more difficult to do that in foreign languages. We are working on upgrades
to our internal systems and procedures to address this. None the less there are
usually things within these messages that we can tag and
I will answer this later in the thread.
_M
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 7:44:01 AM, Kevin wrote:
KR Sorry - I was talking about false positives. I assume we need to send
KR false positives to the false@ address.
KR Can my users send you these messages directly?
KR Or do they need to
Spam should be sent one at a time... if you send them in groups then it is
likely one or more will get removed by a new rule and the others will never be
seen. Sending them one at a time also helps us to clarify details about the
message and reduce any possible errors... our rule-techs are
On Monday, October 10, 2005, 7:55:51 PM, Serge wrote:
S just to make sure, can we now send several spams as attachements in one
S email
S ans what adress to use
S i have 3 that got thru my own mailbox in less than 3 hours
S they did not even get tagged, only failed sorbs and sorbs_dul
oops.
Additional info (justifying the IP block rules just added):
http://www.senderbase.org/search?searchString=200.49.48.0%2F20
I wonder why nobody else is listing these IPs yet. Could we just be
the first? (This exercise has given me some ideas for new research
tasks-- :-) )
Interesting.
_M
On
8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 3:58 PM
To: Chuck Schick
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Spam blocks loading me up with spam
Additional info (justifying the IP block rules just added):
http
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, 8:07:30 PM, Computer wrote:
CHS Thanks for the info. That would explain why my questions were not replied
CHS too. Thought no one was checking. I will resume sending spam.
CHS Can you explain what you meant by: This is to prevent any kind of
social
CHS engineering
I currently forward all spam from my email account can I add a second
address that will be able to forward spam as well?
Jonathan SchoemannNetwork Systems EngineerInformation
ServicesSt. Agnes HealthCare / CSC[EMAIL PROTECTED]410-368-3110
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/05 07:09PM On Monday, March
On Monday, March 7, 2005, 7:00:40 PM, Frederick wrote:
FS No errors. Just SPAM showing as clean.
Be sure to forward / redirect them to the spam@ address if you haven't
already. I'll be making another run in an hour or so - I'll look
closely at anything that doesn't get tagged on the way to me.
On Saturday, January 29, 2005, 9:15:23 PM, Glenn wrote:
GR This is question is a little off subject, but do you have any
GR recommendations for Imail queue manager settings? We are running Sniffer
GR with declude 1.82 under Imail 8.15 and the server seems to bog down
GR sometimes.
It is likely
On Monday, January 31, 2005, 12:28:00 PM, Landry wrote:
LW Well, after a second look (reviewing the headers), it looks like the message
LW got hung-up in the convoluted mess of internal mail gateways that Siemens
LW maintains (which I have no control over). Sorry for the noise...!
Whew!
On Thursday, June 24, 2004, 12:23:22 PM, Herb wrote:
HG Yes, I did about a year or so ago as I remember. I don't
HG know, isthere a spot for this on the message sniffer site?
HG Sniffer folks Then it would be available to whoever wanted it.
Sure. Please package it up in a .zip file for us
13 matches
Mail list logo
