I am particularly interested to hear from MDaemon users who should
realize a multi-fold improvement in processing speed by using this
new version of persistent server. This is one of the critical goals
of these modifications and preliminary responses support that we
have achieved this goal.
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 12:19:12 PM, Jorge wrote:
I am particularly interested to hear from MDaemon users who should
realize a multi-fold improvement in processing speed by using this
new version of persistent server. This is one of the critical goals
of these modifications and
Hello _M
_ Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog
See a reduction of what in their backlog? Can you give an example of how
to see this type of measurement?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete
If I might butt in ...
If you fire up Task Manager on a windows machine (or your favourite ps tool
elsewhere), and set the View, Update Speed to High, then sort by the name in
reverse, you will see multiple sniffer.exe and one with a PID that doesn't
change. That's your persistent instance.
Whups, I missed out an important NOT in the second-to-last paragraph.
Corrected version is below:
-Original Message-
From: Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 10:29 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.
If I might butt in ...
Hello _M
_ Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog
See a reduction of what in their backlog? Can you give an example of how
to see this type of measurement?
a reduction of mail waiting for processing in your spool of course.
for example, right now, my backlog
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 12:54:04 PM, Frank wrote:
FO Hello _M
_ Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog
FO See a reduction of what in their backlog? Can you give an example of how
FO to see this type of measurement?
Another good question - I will try to get
If we don't run the Mdaemon on our systems and just use the new
download, will we also see a speed increase on processing. Thanks for
the time.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:50 PM
What we did was write a wrapper around sniffer, and fire that wrapper from
the Content Filter. that wrapper measures how long each sniffer instance
takes. In the previous version, it took way longer when using the persistent
version than when not using the persistent version. You would expect it
But did you run the persistent version also?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jorge Asch
Sent: woensdag 20 oktober 2004 22:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.
If you fire up Task Manager on a
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 3:05:35 PM, Keith wrote:
KJ If we don't run the Mdaemon on our systems and just use the new
KJ download, will we also see a speed increase on processing. Thanks for
KJ the time.
Yes. The changes that have been made should remove administrative
overhead and
Exactly, Michiel.
And Jorge, it may be stating the obvious, but you may well have to check the
tickbox at the bottom of Task Manager to Show processes from all users. I
said sniffer.exe merely as an example, the actual executable will be [your
licence here].exe or snfrv2r3.exe if you're using
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 4:15:09 PM, Michiel wrote:
MP What we did was write a wrapper around sniffer, and fire that wrapper from
MP the Content Filter. that wrapper measures how long each sniffer instance
MP takes. In the previous version, it took way longer when using the persistent
MP
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 4:03:15 PM, Jorge wrote:
If you fire up Task Manager on a windows machine (or your favourite ps tool
elsewhere), and set the View, Update Speed to High, then sort by the name in
reverse, you will see multiple sniffer.exe and one with a PID that doesn't
change.
14 matches
Mail list logo
