Re[4]: [sniffer] POP Approach

2005-10-14 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, October 14, 2005, 9:39:33 AM, Rick wrote: RH What is going on with the sniffer not catching any of the spam that is now RH coming through? We are getting slammed with medication, mortgage and other RH junk email? Your license has expired. Please send a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to

Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, October 14, 2005, 10:59:05 AM, Chuck wrote: CS We are seeing a lot of the drug spam getting through. Anyway that sniffer CS could start catching these. And yes I am forwarding them all. There are a number of new campaigns launched today with some heavy bandwidth behind them. We have

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] POP Approach

2005-10-14 Thread Daniel Bayerdorffer
Hello Pete, Are you going to implement something similar for false positives? Thanks, Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:32 AM To: William Van Hefner Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] POP

Re[4]: [sniffer] POP Approach

2005-10-14 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, October 14, 2005, 11:18:18 AM, Daniel wrote: DB Hello Pete, DB Are you going to implement something similar for false positives? No. The false positive process is very interactive, so each case is handled individually until it is resolved. This works best as it is currently

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Chuck Schick
Pete: Thanks. I am just frustrated by the continued spam growth. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. (303)-421-5140 www.warp8.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 9:08 AM To: Chuck Schick Subject: Re:

Re: Re[4]: [sniffer] POP Approach

2005-10-14 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Pete, Do you send out notices to licensees to let them know to renew ahead of time? I think we're getting close to renewal, and want to make sure we don't lapse. Darin. - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rick Hogue sniffer@SortMonster.com Cc: [EMAIL

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Landry William
We do exactly this at our Postfix gateways, it's called greylisting. See http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/. You may want to consider setting up a gateway in front of your IMail server that supports greylisting. Bill -Original Message- From: Mike Nice [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread David Payer
- Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/ My experience with Greylisting is that it is very effective in stopping spam and also other mail as well. Most scripts that send direct will never get through to a greylisted server