On Friday, February 24, 2006, 7:13:47 AM, Jeff wrote:
JP Do I need to modify anything in my Declude configuration file where it calls
JP the SNIFFER test in order for this to function ??
No. You set up a persistent instance outside of Declude and the other
SNF instances adapt automatically.
_M
Pete,
Thanks for the quicker turnaround in the last few
days for false positive processing. We're seeing abouthalf day
now.
Much appreciated!
Darin.
Hi,
I just got my service up and running using Matt's post
http://www.mail-archive.com/sniffer@sortmonster.com/msg00169.html
It was simple especially since I already the resource kit installed.
Now I know that this I supposed to work to get the persistent instance
to load the new rulebase
Goran,
When you issue a reload you can tell that the new rulebase is being used
because the *.svr file's date and time will change to the current time.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Friday,
On Friday, February 24, 2006, 10:31:25 AM, Goran wrote:
GJ Hi,
GJ I just got my service up and running using Matt's post
GJ http://www.mail-archive.com/sniffer@sortmonster.com/msg00169.html
GJ It was simple especially since I already the resource kit installed.
GJ Now I know that this I
Hi,
Thanks.
I will treat result code 63 with a combo filter so that any parallel hit
with a regular RBL won't end up counting twice. That should take care of
it.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL