[sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer....

2006-05-05 Thread Chuck Schick
The last few days tons on Drus spam is coming in and sniffer is catching none of it. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. (303)-421-5140 www.warp8.com This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to

RE: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer....

2006-05-05 Thread Daniel Bayerdorffer
Here too. -- Daniel Bayerdorffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Numberall Stamp Tool Co., Inc. PO Box 187 Sangerville, ME 04479 USA TEL 207-876-3541 FAX 207-876-3566 www.numberall.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick Sent:

RE: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer....

2006-05-05 Thread Kevin Stanford
I have been getting them here also and have forwarded some to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess to get past the filters the spammers misspell key words throughout the email with new web links. It is misspelled so badly that I cannot really make sense of it. Are there actual people out there that would

Re[2]: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer....

2006-05-05 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, May 5, 2006, 11:02:00 AM, Darin wrote: DC Not just drugs, but some others too have been slipping through the past DC couple of days. We've reported a little under 40 in the past couple of DC days. We saw a bit of a lull, then a rash of new campaigns bunched together with some new

RE: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer....

2006-05-05 Thread John A. Back
The more interesting fact is that Outlook's generic spam filter is catching 1 to 7 spam messages per day for me. John Back Baldwin School -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 10:34 AM To:

Re[2]: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer....

2006-05-05 Thread Pete McNeil
We've had that rule before and had to pull it for false positives. _M On Friday, May 5, 2006, 11:41:50 AM, John wrote: JTL FYI, I created a Declude Filter: JTL Subject END NOTCONTAINS news JTL BODY25 CONTAINShttp://geocities.com/ JTL Been catching every one

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer....

2006-05-05 Thread John T (Lists)
Well, I am at the point that I could care less about geocities false positives. If GeoCities is going to allow this much spam junk then I could care less about allowing them. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re[4]: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer....

2006-05-05 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, May 5, 2006, 1:08:14 PM, John wrote: JTL Well, I am at the point that I could care less about geocities false JTL positives. If GeoCities is going to allow this much spam junk then I could JTL care less about allowing them. That's fine. There are probably a number of systems that

RE: Re[4]: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer....

2006-05-05 Thread John T (Lists)
Just when you think we won the battle, they move the targets and change the rules. This is why we need people like Pete and Darrell to help us fight this ever changing war. A big thanks. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]