I have seen one hit, and it looks like a false positive to me. Sent as a
sample to the false@ address.
Thanks for the heads-up, Darin.
Andrew.
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, August
On 8/17/2010 3:10 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi,
We've had a lot of FPs on this
rule, and wanted to alert everyone on it.
Pete, can you look into it?
It's already dead.
It was a binary rule for an image
We had 231 hits on that rule from 12:15pm to 3:03pm ET. At least 90% of them
were FPs. Since there was a broad spectrum of customers and content affected,
I'm guessing there was an error or over-generalization in the rule.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Colbeck, Andrew
To:
Thanks, Pete.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:37 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Rule Panic on 3364665
On 8/17/2010 3:10 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi,
We've had a lot of FPs on this rule, and wanted to alert
