Re: [sniffer] False positive processing

2006-03-21 Thread Darin Cox
- From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [sniffer] False positive processing On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 9:38:46 AM, Darin wrote: DC DC DC Hi Pete, DC DC DC DC Are you getting behind on false positive processing

Re[2]: [sniffer] False positive processing

2006-03-21 Thread Pete McNeil
On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 11:37:30 AM, Darin wrote: DC Nope. None of them. DC I haven't heard back from the replies to a couple of false positives on the DC 10th, and we haven't heard anything from our submissions on the 16th (6) and DC 17th (2). I don't remember if we've heard anything from

Re[4]: [sniffer] False positive processing

2006-03-21 Thread Pete McNeil
to investigate further and apply white DC rules. The others were normal FP reports. DC Thanks, DC Darin. DC - Original Message - DC From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] DC To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com DC Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:52 AM DC Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] False

[sniffer] False positive processing

2006-02-24 Thread Darin Cox
Pete, Thanks for the quicker turnaround in the last few days for false positive processing. We're seeing abouthalf day now. Much appreciated! Darin.