PROTECTED]
CS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CS On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
CS Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 9:32 AM
CS To: Darin Cox
CS Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer
CS On Friday, May 5, 2006, 11:02:00 AM, Darin wrote:
DC Not just drugs, but some others too have been
The last few days tons on Drus spam is coming in and sniffer is catching
none of it.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
: Friday, May 05, 2006 10:34 AM
To: sniffer@sortmonster.com
Subject: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer
The last few days tons on Drus spam is coming in and sniffer
is catching
none of it.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
This E-Mail came
buy this
stuff from a spam email like that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Daniel Bayerdorffer
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 9:38 AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer
Here too
On Friday, May 5, 2006, 11:02:00 AM, Darin wrote:
DC Not just drugs, but some others too have been slipping through the past
DC couple of days. We've reported a little under 40 in the past couple of
DC days.
We saw a bit of a lull, then a rash of new campaigns bunched together
with some new
@sortmonster.com
Subject: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer
The last few days tons on Drus spam is coming in and sniffer is catching
none of it.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un
] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 10:34 AM
To: sniffer@sortmonster.com
Subject: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer
The last few days tons on Drus spam is coming in and sniffer
is catching
none of it.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421
PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 9:09 AM
To: John T (Lists)
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer
We've had that rule before and had to pull it for false positives.
_M
On Friday, May 5, 2006, 11:41:50 AM, John wrote
On Friday, May 5, 2006, 1:08:14 PM, John wrote:
JTL Well, I am at the point that I could care less about geocities false
JTL positives. If GeoCities is going to allow this much spam junk then I could
JTL care less about allowing them.
That's fine.
There are probably a number of systems that
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:37 AM
To: John T (Lists)
Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer
On Friday, May 5, 2006, 1:08:14 PM, John wrote:
JTL Well, I am at the point that I could care less about geocities
10 matches
Mail list logo
