I also have hit this. A single hit, also from AOL.
Andrew.
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 6:37 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Problem with Sniffer-Porn rule
Any word on this?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 9:37 AM
Subject: [sniffer] Problem with Sniffer-Porn rule this morning
Pete,
There appears to be a problem with rule 1984485 this morning. I'm getting a
number
.
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 8:31 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Problem with Sniffer-Porn rule this morning
I also have hit this. A single hit, also from AOL.
Andrew
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Problem with Sniffer-Porn rule this morning
I also have hit this. A single hit, also from AOL.
Andrew.
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Hello Darin,
Friday, July 18, 2008, 9:37:18 AM, you wrote:
Pete,
There appears to be a problem with rule 1984485 this morning. I'm getting a number of FP hits on it from AOL users.
The rule has been pulled already.
_M
--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist,
Arm Research Labs, LLC.
Hello Darin,
Friday, July 18, 2008, 11:39:47 AM, you wrote:
We had 18 hits on it from ~6:40-9:30am EDT before putting in the rule panic, 5 of which reached our hold weight. We've had 27 more hits since adding the rule panic.
When a rule panic is in place the rule should be inert.
with Sniffer-Porn rule this morning
Hello Darin,
Friday, July 18, 2008, 11:39:47 AM, you wrote:
We had 18 hits on it from ~6:40-9:30am EDT before putting in the rule
panic, 5 of which reached our hold weight. We've had 27 more hits since adding
the rule panic.
When
Community
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 12:12 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Problem with Sniffer-Porn rule this morning
Hello Darin,
Friday, July 18, 2008, 9:37:18 AM, you wrote:
Pete,
There appears to be a problem with rule 1984485 this morning. I'm
getting a number of FP
Hello Darin,
Friday, July 18, 2008, 1:07:56 PM, you wrote:
Yes. The rule is inert. However, according to the logs the rule would have been hit 27 more times had we not added the rule panic.
Thanks for clarifying. If it were something else I'd want to get on that right away ;-)
_M
Hello Darin,
Friday, July 18, 2008, 1:12:39 PM, you wrote:
Hmmm... I don't think the rule was already pulled. We update our rulebase upon receipt of the notification of a new rulebase being available, and according to our logs the rule was in until at least 11:24am EDT.
The rule
10 matches
Mail list logo
