[sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 2654821

2009-09-08 Thread Andy Schmidt
='64.78.17.17' t='u' c='0.071429' p='0' r='Normal'/ /s From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 4:49 PM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 2654821 Neglected to mention it is a Sniffer-Porn

[sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 2654821

2009-09-08 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
: [sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 2654821 Neglected to mention it is a Sniffer-Porn rule. Darin. - Original Message - From: Darin Cox mailto:dc...@4cweb.com To: Message Sniffer Community mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 4:47 PM Subject: [sniffer] RulePanic

[sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 2654821

2009-09-08 Thread Darin Cox
: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 5:19 PM Subject: [sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 2654821 The scores over here for the messages that trigger on rule 2654821 today: spam that hit the rule: 4 ... and were porn: 0 ham that was held by my weight system: 5 ham that was allowed by my weight system: 3

[sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 2654821

2009-09-08 Thread Pete McNeil
Darin Cox wrote: We had a lot... 534 hits between 3:26 and 4:41pm ET, which is when we added the rule panic. It appears the rule was added in a rulebase that was automatically updated at 3:26pm ET. Pete? Status? Here is a preliminary report on the bad rule: The rule was coded in error --