: donderdag 8 april 2004 21:11To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for
snfrv2r3
Preliminary tests show there's no I/O problem but I'll do some
additional benchmarking here and get back to you on
this.
Groet, (regards)
--
ing. Michiel Prins
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Michiel Prins
Sent: donderdag 8 april 2004 21:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
Preliminary tests show there's
no I/O problem but I'll do some additional benchmarking here and get back
to you
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeilSent: woensdag 7 april 2004 17:38To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for
snfrv2r3
Extraordinary...Compare with a snippet from our IMail/NT4 test
platform (severely underpowered)...snf2beta 20040407140913
D0b86122.SMD 30 90 Final 75148
At 05:42 AM 4/8/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote:
http://www.keyconn.net/misc/sniffer.htm
I'll bet you are using b1 - this first 2-3beta does not implement the
command interface.
Yes, I had b1 in use, trying b2 now.
--
Kirk Mitchell-General Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keystone Connect
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeilSent: woensdag 7 april 2004 11:21To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for
snfrv2r3
What does the sniffer log show during this time?_MAt
04:48 AM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
Pete,Despite
my suggestions
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
At 04:06 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
So,
making sure I'm following your analysis: I'm looking at my log file and
I'm seeing lines similar to
snf2beta 20040407020014
D60a4134.SMD
181 30 Match 101576 58 20 38
What is the best and proper way to setup Persistent mode on a windows 2000
computer and run as a service.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:30 PM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
Sniffer is adaptive. You can turn the persistent instance on and off at
will. Simply stop the service - a reboot is not needed. If the persistent
instance is turned off then the remaining instances will organize
themselves in the usual way.
I don't have it running as a service, I started the
My findings are that persistent is offering great benefits, havnt tried an
excessively harsh test yet, but i'm about to do that.
Just ran sniffer in both persistent and non-persistent modes with over 1,000 mesages
in the overflow and MaxQueProc at 50. This pegs out my CPU between 90% 100%
At 09:11 PM 4/7/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote:
sniffer.exe stop - will stop the persistent server by sending it a message
file.
Run 'sniffer.exe stop' at the command line and your persistent instance
will exit cleanly on it's own. [ replace sniffer.exe with the name of your
executable of course
This worked great.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
At 08:36 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote:
What is the best and proper way to setup Persistent
Tried the above and got an error message. Tried:
sniffer.exe xxauthenticationxx stop
and it paused a few seconds and returned to command prompt, so I'm guessing
that it stopped.
That doesn't sound quite right.
In the distribution there are some .CMD files that show examples of the
commands:
Since you're up, sorry to ask, where's the beta? Didn't save the e-mail.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3
13 matches
Mail list logo
