RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

2004-10-28 Thread Landry William
file) with each download attempt. Bill -Original Message- From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 6:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you? Does anyone have a little

Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

2004-10-27 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Message - From: Landry William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 7:29 PM Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you? Aren't you using the compression option to gzip your files before downloading them? This compresses a 14mb

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

2004-10-26 Thread Nick Justice
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 3:29 PM To: Glenn Brooks Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you? On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 11:03:45 AM, Glenn wrote: GB can you send the link to this again http://www.sortmonster.com