On Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 4:32:14 PM, Robert wrote:
RG The X-SNF header. Sounds like a good idea. Is there a cheat sheet someplace
RG for making that happen, if possible, in a Declude / Imail environment?
RG Thanks ahead of time,
In the distribution the option is described in the .cfg
Jim,
Not at this time. The two processes are entirely different. The False
Positives process is highly interactive. The standardized responses
were implemented to allow for some automation on both sides.
Spam submissions are always treated as anonymous for security reasons
and also because of
On Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 4:48:43 PM, Computer wrote:
CHS I second the motion. We have been submitting spam for over a year and I
CHS don't know if a single one was received.
In general, if you've not received an error during delivery, we most
certainly got your message... it may have
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006, 8:42:22 AM, Frederick wrote:
FS Same with me. Last night there was a rules update and it fixed the problem.
FS Check the date of your rules update.
Please visit
http://www.mail-archive.com/sniffer@sortmonster.com/msg02346.html
and
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006, 8:54:49 AM, Darin wrote:
DC Agreed. We counted 100 false positives yesterday, compared to our normal
DC rate of less than 5.
DC No false positives since 6pm ET yesterday, though. Thank goodness.
Please visit:
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 9:37:29 AM, Judy wrote:
JB Pete,
JB Can you send these kinds of emails to Hamed instead of me please.
JB thanks
I have changed your subscription.
Please note you can alter your sniffer@ list subscription at any time.
Information is on our help page:
