[sniffer] Re: IP Change on rulebase delivery system

2013-03-28 Thread Pete McNeil
On 2013-03-28 12:10, Richard Stupek wrote: Ok looking at the log I see quite a few messages taking over a second to process (samples below): s u='20130328155503' m=\temp\1332407477322.msg' s='0' r='0' p s='1172' t='1109' l='72697' d='127'/ g o='0' i='12.130.136.172' t='u' c='0.486243'

[sniffer] Re: IP Change on rulebase delivery system

2013-03-28 Thread Darin Cox
Richard, Do you have any directories with a large number of files (4k)? We had a similar problem a few months back with sniffer scans taking much longer to complete and sniffer temporary files being left over. We finally traced the performance issues to a frequently accessed directory with

[sniffer] How fast is *my* MessageSniffer? (was: IP Change on rulebase delivery system)

2013-03-28 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Answer: pretty darn fast for a system that I think is slow anyway I think my MTA is a busy system, and I know that it's not MessageSniffer that keeps the server busy. A glance with Task Manager or Process Explorer shows very little CPU time is spent by MessageSniffer. I threw some grepping

[sniffer] Re: How fast is *my* MessageSniffer? (was: IP Change on rulebase delivery system)

2013-03-28 Thread Darin Cox
Nice stats, Andrew! And Pete, thanks for spending so much time and effort to make it work so well, despite us beating on you because it doesn’t catch every spam campaign from the very first message! Sniffer has always been our number one tool in this battle. Darin. From: Colbeck, Andrew