Answer: pretty darn fast for a system that I think is slow anyway

 

I think my MTA is a busy system, and I know that it's not MessageSniffer
that keeps the server busy. A glance with Task Manager or Process
Explorer shows very little CPU time is spent by MessageSniffer.

 

I threw some grepping etc and then Excel at the xml file for one average
business day and came up with...

 

 

 

25% of messages are scanned within 100ms

 

50% of messages are scanned within 140ms

 

99% of messages are scanned within 330ms

 

 

I also looked at the "setup time". I'll spare you the graph; my results
are:

 

80% of messages are loaded so quickly that the time is recorded as zero
ms

 

85% of messages are loaded in 15ms or fewer

 

95% of messages are loaded in 30ms or fewer

 

99% of messages are loaded 125ms or fewer

 

Actually, everything above 98% of my volume takes longer to load but for
ridiculously smaller volume of messages. A spot check shows that those
are indeed rodents messages of unusual size.

 

Thanks for the nudge, Pete. I knew MessageSniffer was fast, I just
hadn't bothered to quantify it before.

 

 

Andrew.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:43 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: IP Change on rulebase delivery system

 

On 2013-03-27 17:16, Richard Stupek wrote:

> The spikes aren't as prolonged at the present.

 

Interesting. A short spike like that might be expected if the message
was longer than usual, but on average SNF should be very light-weight.

 

One thing you can check is the performance data in your logs. That will
show how much time in cpu milleseconds it is taking for each scan and
how long the scans are in bytes. This might shed some light.

 

http://www.armresearch.com/support/articles/software/snfServer/logFiles/
activityLogs.jsp
<http://www.armresearch.com/support/articles/software/snfServer/logFiles
/activityLogs.jsp> 

 

Look for something like <p s='10' t='8' l='3294' d='84'/> in each scan.

 

>From the documentation:

 

> <s><p/></s> - Scan Performance Monitoring (performance='yes') p:s = 

> Setup time in milliseconds p:t = Scan time in milliseconds p:l = Scan 

> length in bytes p:d = Scan depth (peak evaluator count)

> 

 

Best,

 

_M

 

 

--

Pete McNeil

Chief Scientist

ARM Research Labs, LLC

www.armresearch.com <http://www.armresearch.com> 

866-770-1044 x7010

twitter/codedweller

 

 

#############################################################

This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to

  the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com
<mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com> >.

This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,

Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.

For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
<http://www.armresearch.com> 

To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
<mailto:sniffer-...@sortmonster.com> >

To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com
<mailto:sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com> >

To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com
<mailto:sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com> >

Send administrative queries to  <sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com
<mailto:sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com> >

 

<<image001.png>>

Reply via email to