Too bad Brian Smith does not live over here, he could fly my planes for me
while I drink beer!
Cheers!!!> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:31:10 -0600> To: soaring@airage.com> From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [RCSE] DLGs = Bang for the Buck, NO WAY;
Benchmarks- Get Real.> >
That is about how long it takes me to get my 132 inch span RES model
ready to fly after I get to the field. The model fits in my van
ready to fly except that the outer wing panels have to be plugged in
and taped on. The model was designed with a 3 piece wing with a 48
inch center wing that wi
times there is very little low level lift, but other than that,
Beat that!> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: soaring@airage.com> Subject: [RCSE]
DLGs = Bang for the Buck, NO WAY; Benchmarks- Get Real.> Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007
19:22:18 +> > I have to disagree with Buzz regarding DL
LOL...JT...I think you hit it on the head...can I get a pairadem, too? Hey I
got great bang for my buck...I know my Genie LTS floats!...as Gordy
says.."You?"...
Have a great holiday season fellow r/csoarers!
Jim
Jimmy Prouty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "As my buddy Bubba would say, "Y'
And Carnac speaks...
-- Original message from "Jay Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
Classic... rather than admit you are wrong or defend your position you resort
to pettiness...
On Dec 2, 2007 4:37 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So many opinions, so little of value..
Easy there girls.
This whole thread is based on opinions, ideas, individule experiences etc, etc.
Although this current thread has become rather cumbersome due to it's length,
it has sometimes been entertaining as well as informative. It has brought back
some memories that go back, for me, to
Classic... rather than admit you are wrong or defend your position you
resort to pettiness...
On Dec 2, 2007 4:37 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So many opinions, so little of value...
>
> -- Original message from Michael Whitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> --
>
>
> > I disa
"As my buddy Bubba would say, "Y'all have a ball getting yer undies
twisted with this one"."
Looks like the undies are getting twisted!
Funny comparison. With the weight that my original attempts at
scratch building thermal ships came out at, I was getting a LOT for
my money! ;)
Jimmy
RCS
So many opinions, so little of value...
-- Original message from Michael Whitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
> I disagree with your analysis. We're not flying fruit so cost per
> ounce is irrelevant.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Dec 2, 2007, at 11:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree with your analysis. We're not flying fruit so cost per
ounce is irrelevant.
Mike
On Dec 2, 2007, at 11:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to disagree with Buzz regarding DLG being the best value. I
agree that DLG has made HL more accessible to all pilots due it the
ergono
Jim,
Your comparison is completly wrong. You are using cost per ounce as the
determining factor Why?
If we tie a brick to the dlg, it could go to the top cost per ounce list,
and you would have a flying brick. Conversely if someone applied better
(modern??) building technics to the Sagitta
e-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 9:22 AM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] DLGs = Bang for the Buck, NO WAY; Benchmarks- Get Real.
I have to disagree with Buzz regarding DLG being the best value. I agree
that DLG has made HL more acce
I have to disagree with Buzz regarding DLG being the best value. I agree that
DLG has made HL more accessible to all pilots due it the ergonomics of
launching them. But value, for that lets
take a step back and look at it from a distance.
When evaluated analytically, DLG is absolutely the wors
13 matches
Mail list logo
