Can't argue with the weight or power consumption of a STY. Those
early NSC processors and EPROMS are pretty power hungry. I'm glad
you like your JR. However, The point I was trying to make, albeit
poorly, was that reverting to a 20-year old problem (channel to
channel mixing only ) is
So what you are saying is Apple should make a radio :-)
D.O. Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can't argue with the weight or power
consumption of a STY. Those
early NSC processors and EPROMS are pretty power hungry. I'm glad
you like your JR. However, The point I was trying to make,
Seems like reinventing the wheel to me.. but maybe I'm just in a
funny MODE.
Completely open programming paradigms are not very useful as
evidenced by the lack of success and popularity (specifically, their
programming) of the ACE and Multiplex TX's for the common hobbiest
It's a
could click a button and start programming that switch the way you want it.
But at the end of the day, I like my JR 9303 and wouldn't trade it for a sack
full of stylus's.
No flame suit on here, just a little sunblock.
Tom From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Soaring@airage.com Subject: [RCSE] JR
4 matches
Mail list logo
