Re: [RCSE] Safety Code

2002-06-11 Thread Lincoln Ross
I think it's really strange that this rule is coming up at the same time that AMA is easing up on 55lb planes (see the AMA website). I think there is no comparision of risk here. I seem to recall being hit by foamies and slow flyers but these were all non-events. It's the hits on people by hard ai

Re: [RCSE] Safety Code

2002-06-10 Thread Brett Jaffee
Good letter. I intend to send a similar one to the District X VP tonight. I'm also thinking about included links to the various manufacturers this rule could effectand maybe remind them that many of these manufacturers advertise in Model Aviation. Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I j

Re: [RCSE] Safety Code

2002-06-10 Thread GlennDean
I just sent the message below to my AVP, with CC's to the president, technical director, and safety director. It's easy to get their email addresses from the AMA website (follow the "contact us" links) at: http://www.modelaircraft.org Feel free to plagiarize. Glenn > I received an email t

Re: [RCSE] Safety Code

2002-06-10 Thread JMiller
quot;'Jerry Miller'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: [RCSE] Safety Code > So, now we will no longer play "combat". We'll play "oops". > > Meaning: &q