Is this is a veiled suggestion that Olympic athletes perform better? Is this
a premise that their performance is superior because they don't receive
payment? If that's your conclusion, you haven't done your research.
Was this an offer to write? Or just another typical RCSE "when
In a message dated 6/13/00 6:25:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this is a veiled suggestion that Olympic athletes perform better? Is
this
a premise that their performance is superior because they don't receive
payment? If that's your conclusion, you haven't
In a message dated 6/13/00 9:49:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
You missed the point. My comment said nothing about RCSD -- read it again.
I simply pointed out that if Garwood believes Olympic level athletes do not
receive payment, he needs to do substantially
G,
Don't forget I said I would be willing to pay more if I could make out the pictures.
It is indeed a great newsletter (it used to be a magazine) I just do not want to see
it get any worse print quality wise. Believe me, I think very highly of the writers
and Judy and Jerry. I haven't
4 matches
Mail list logo