MB: On social welfare, you misunderstand my point. I am not saying that
everyone
must be employed to get services. I am saying that everyone who is employed
designates a faith based (or secular) social welfare fund that their
employer
pays into in lieu of paying into the VAT. Those who get
Quoting Gunnar Tomasson:
In the context of Say's Law, the concept of saving
means - and can only mean - one thing, namely, Factor
Investment in the economy's work in progress.
The financial or monetary counterpart of such
Saving comprises IOUs which Suppliers of Factor
Services receive from
John Gelles wrote:
Visit www.tiea.us/dvl.htm
This is more clickable, if you precede it with http://
so I suggest http://www.tiea.us/dvl.htm
(just the way browsers know to recognize a URL :)
***
I recently pulled this announcement from our Library of
Congress (LOC). The LOC has engaged in
The Phelps County bank of Rollo Missouri is an ESOP owned bank.
http://www.phelpscountybank.com/employee_owned_history.htm
Suppose now, that a consortium of local businesses formed up a
community trust and funded the trust with grants or loans and then
approached the employee owners of this bank
Chick:
I totally agree that the faith based groups, as they now operate, cannot be counted on
to provide the social services we speak of. However, I do not believe this will
always be so. In the end, having dealt with state mental health, social welfare and
child protection agencies, I trust
Victor
VB: Society is a collective of individuals. People associate in order to
increase the benefits to themselves because it was long discovered that
people in association can do more than by one person by himself or herself.
In that sense there is an increment of association, the results of
It would only accomplish the avowed goals if that is what they endeavoured
to do and carried it out. It would also depend on the type of charter and
the terms under which it exists. Theoretically though it could.
My guess is that if the employees knew and understood Social Credit the
situation
On Friday 21 February 2003 02:05, you wrote:
MB:
Churches will also adopt such principals. Hierarchies will be replaced by
assemblies of lay deacons who are hired by their congregations. Bishops
will not administer property or institutions, but will stick to teaching
and ministry. Freed
