does anyone have the output of vmstat , netstat and iostat ,etc to see
how the hardware was performing at that time? would be really
interesting to see and compare.
i think bsd wont make much more speed difference in terms of packet
size in order to nat, more sounds to me pps would be the
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 12:37 -0500, Bill Borton wrote:
I picked up a couple of net4501s for use as time servers and am pretty darn
impressed with them. I'd like to get a couple more and use them as simple
router/firewalls running NanoBSD. A quick throughput test with iperf only
gives me ~14
Bill Borton wrote:
I picked up a couple of net4501s for use as time servers and am pretty darn
impressed with them. I'd like to get a couple more and use them as simple
router/firewalls running NanoBSD. A quick throughput test with iperf only
gives me ~14 Mbits/s without fastforwarding and
