[soft_radio] Re: ECSS vs Synch

2007-05-02 Thread Leif Asbrink
Hello Brynjar, Whoops, I was commenting on the ECSS vs Synch question. I had totally forgotten that the ECSS in SD-Radio is in reality a Synchroneous detector, and as such will indeed follow the carrier (or wander with the lack of one). I still get better quality from Power SDR's SAM mode,

[soft_radio] Re: ECSS vs Synch

2007-05-02 Thread i2phd
Bill, Brynjar, Francis and Leif, just a few comments in no specific order. ECSS in SDRadio tries to lock to the AM carrier. Francis' suggestion is a very good one, i.e. revert to AM when synch is lost. Next revision of SDRadio will have it. Bill, sorry that ECSS doesn't work for you. I

Re: [soft_radio] Re: ECSS vs Synch

2007-05-02 Thread FRANCIS CARCIA
Alberto, My main concern is the shift in the capture range as the ECSS attempts to lock to a carrier near the edge of the selected capture range (CF +/-). When this happens I have to select AM retune then reselect ECSS. If the program dropped back to am mode you would still decode audio while

[soft_radio] Re: ECSS vs Synch

2007-05-01 Thread Brynjar Berg
Whoops, I was commenting on the ECSS vs Synch question. I had totally forgotten that the ECSS in SD-Radio is in reality a Synchroneous detector, and as such will indeed follow the carrier (or wander with the lack of one). I still get better quality from Power SDR's SAM mode, but it is indeed