I ended up deleting it, so I could control it directly with overrrides - thanks
for the tip :)
Morten
> Den 8. december 2016 klokken 20:14 skrev Steven Caron :
>
>
> Yes, its useful for animating visibility of an object. But it can confuse
> Softimage a bit when switching
Yes, its useful for animating visibility of an object. But it can confuse
Softimage a bit when switching passes or overrides. Sometimes it just needs
a refresh. ie. toggle the partition visibility. Of course if you don't need
it, delete it.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Morten Bartholdy
Didn't know there could be alembic visibility ops but that was the culprit it
seems - thanks!
Cheers
Morten
> Den 1. december 2016 klokken 18:57 skrev Steven Caron :
>
>
> Are there alembic_visibility operators on the Visibility property?
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:07
Are you working on si2015 sp2?
or Si 2014 sp2? maybe it's a shader thing. Does the log says something?
verbose at command prompt maybe?
On Dec 2, 2016 11:45 AM, "Morten Bartholdy" wrote:
> Not at the office today so I will take a look on Monday. I have not used
> alembic a
Not at the office today so I will take a look on Monday. I have not used
alembic a lot so I am still finding my way around it.
MB
> Den 1. december 2016 klokken 18:57 skrev Steven Caron :
>
>
> Are there alembic_visibility operators on the Visibility property?
>
> On Thu,
Are there alembic_visibility operators on the Visibility property?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Morten Bartholdy
wrote:
> I am setting up some passes with imported alembic geometry and experience
> while overriding visibility and switching passes that if an alembic file
6 matches
Mail list logo