To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: A more graceful retirement - my counter offer
I suppose I should have phrased that There has literally never been a
single public champion of Softimage at a decision-making level.
Was there ever a SIGGRAPH, usergroup meeting
Autodesk : Tél: 514 954-7134
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Paul
Griswold
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:27 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: A more graceful retirement - my
, 2014 1:27 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: A more graceful retirement - my counter offer
I suppose I should have phrased that There has literally never been
a single public champion of Softimage at a decision-making level.
Was there ever a SIGGRAPH
@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: A more graceful retirement - my counter offer
I suppose I should have phrased that There has literally never been a single
public champion of Softimage at a decision-making level.
Was there ever a SIGGRAPH, usergroup meeting, or anything of the sort where
anyone
...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Paul Griswold
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:27 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: A more graceful retirement - my counter offer
I suppose I should have phrased that There has
954-7134
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Paul Griswold
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:27 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: A more graceful retirement - my counter offer
I suppose I
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: A more graceful retirement - my counter offer
I suppose I should have phrased that There has literally never been a
single public champion of Softimage at a decision-making level.
Was there ever a SIGGRAPH, usergroup meeting, or anything
-- Originalnachricht --
Von: Maurice Patel maurice.pa...@autodesk.com
An: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Gesendet: 13.03.2014 09:34:16
Betreff: RE: A more graceful retirement - my counter offer
Hi Tim,
I don't think anyone here at Autodesk would
Unfortunately it doesn't seem like Autodesk had any idea who Softimage
users even are before making the decision to take away our main tool.
It's been said over and over again. If we felt Maya or Max were the best
tool for the job, we'd buy it. But there are dozens and dozens of reasons
why Maya
Since the day Autodesk bought Softimage, it's been one cruel joke. There
has literally never been a single champion of Softimage at a
decision-making level, right? It's been the red-headed step-child since
the moment of the acquisition.
I'm not sure this statement is entirely true. The
Was wondering where your voice was Brad!
On 13 March 2014 17:21, Bradley Gabe witha...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the day Autodesk bought Softimage, it's been one cruel joke. There
has literally never been a single champion of Softimage at a
decision-making level, right? It's been the
I suppose I should have phrased that There has literally never been a
single public champion of Softimage at a decision-making level.
Was there ever a SIGGRAPH, usergroup meeting, or anything of the sort where
anyone with any sort of authority at Autodesk called for more exposure,
more marketing,
Not really. Which is why my top 5 list for Alastair would have been
something like:
-Chinny
-Halfdan
-Ronald
-Schoennagel
-Jen
-etc...
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Paul Griswold
pgrisw...@fusiondigitalproductions.com wrote:
I suppose I should have phrased that There has literally never
I'm not quite among the top 10 3rd party developers (wrote a couple of
topology operators though for curve editing and extrusions, with the
classic SDK), but allow me:
The operator SDK has the limitation of not allowing to write to
clusters/cluster properties. Therefore it's not possible to
14 matches
Mail list logo
