Wow Brad - very nice spot - deja vu - we are in the middle of doing the same
thing - melena + mod compounds on Khumba. What was this rendered in may I ask?
S.
_
Sandy Sutherland
Technical Supervisor
sandy.sutherl...@triggerfish.co.za
_
Stunning...I wish we could see some ice tree, and so on...
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Sandy
Sutherland
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 8:55 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: The boy who cried wolf
Looks really great.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Ben Houston b...@exocortex.com wrote:
Beautiful work!
-ben
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Bradley Gabe witha...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.themill.com/work/emerson-lukoil-us.aspx
Amazing work done by The Mill.
The wolf was
Very awesome work! Congrats to The Mill folks! Keep churning them out!
Eric Thivierge
http://www.ethivierge.com
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:02 PM, David Barosin dbaro...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks really great.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Ben
Kevin Ives at the Mill did all the fur grooming and lighting/rendering. And
yes, it's Arnold. :)
Jimmy Gass helped out by writing ICE code to read in and re-interpolate
strand velocities for motion blur. I believe regular motion blur was fairly
linear and ugly without that.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012
Nice work! Great job guys. +1 for the Gass :).
On 7/26/2012 7:35 AM, Ajit Menon wrote:
Kevin Ives at the Mill did all the fur grooming and
lighting/rendering. And yes, it's Arnold. :)
Jimmy Gass helped out by writing ICE code to read in and
re-interpolate strand velocities for motion blur. I
Yes it was rendered in Arnold.
--
Fred
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Bradley Gabe witha...@gmail.com wrote:
I would suspect Arnold, but can't say for sure.
Someone who worked on the spot might be able to verify.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Sandy Sutherland
Not sure, I think it was 9.5. Why?
--
Fred
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Chris Chia chris.c...@autodesk.com wrote:
Which version of Softimage was used?
Chris
On 27 Jul, 2012, at 8:38 AM, Frederic Servant
frederic.serv...@gmail.commailto:frederic.serv...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes it was
Just wondering cos Arnold was used... U meant 2011.5?
Anyway, indeed nice hair touch!
Chris
On 27 Jul, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Frederic Servant
frederic.serv...@gmail.commailto:frederic.serv...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure, I think it was 9.5. Why?
--
Fred
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Chris Chia
Yes 2011.5, sorry we have not switched to the marketing version numbering
on xsi yet.
I think we started using Arnold on xsi 8 (2010), or was it 7.5?
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Chris Chia chris.c...@autodesk.com wrote:
Just wondering cos Arnold was used... U meant 2011.5?
Anyway,
:33 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: The boy who cried wolf
Yes 2011.5, sorry we have not switched to the marketing version numbering on
xsi yet.
I think we started using Arnold on xsi 8 (2010), or was it 7.5?
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Chris Chia
chris.c
This particular job was done on Fedora Core 11 but we have now switched to
CentOS 6.2. The version of Arnold was 4 something for this job, we are now
using 4.0.6.0.
--
Fred
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Chris Chia chris.c...@autodesk.com wrote:
One more quick info needed, is it running on
Cool!
Thanks Frederic.
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Frederic Servant
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 10:11 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: The boy who cried wolf
This particular job was done on Fedora
13 matches
Mail list logo
