Solr index distribution already does this with a slightly different
mechanism. It moves the files instead of the directory. I recommend
understanding and using the standard scripts for index distribution.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionDistribution
wunder
On 9/29/08 9:55 PM, Otis
Thanks Everybody.
I have went through the wiki and some other docs. Actually I have a tight
schedule and I have to look into various other things along with this.
Currently I am looking into rebuilding solr by writing a wrapper class.
I will update you with more meaningful questions soon..
If I'm not mistaken, doesn't facet.query accomplish what you want?
Erik
On Sep 29, 2008, at 5:43 PM, Simon Hu wrote:
I also need the exact same feature. I was not able to find an easy
solution
and ended up modifying class SimpleFacets to make it accept an array
of
facet
Hi Saurabh Bhutyani,
Is it show the two core links in ur solr home page like
Admin core0
Admin core1
if not,the problem is you are upgrading the solr from 1.2 to 1.3. Better
stop the server delete all the floders in
%Tomcat_Home%\work\Catalina\localhost location and restart it.
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to create a fieldtype which will apart from the
whitespacedtokenized tokens also store concatenated versions of the tokens.
The ShingleFilter does s.th. very similar but keeps spaces in between words.
In german a shoe(Schuh) you wear in your 'spare time'(Freizeit) is
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason, can you please open a jira issue to add this feature?
Done.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-795
Jason
That was indeed the error, I apologize for wasting your time. Thank you very
much for the help.
Kyle
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Is that a mis-spelling?
mulitValued=true
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:12 AM, KyleMorrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to index fields as such:
I haven't used the German analyzer (either Snowball or the one we have in
Lucene's contrib), but have you checked if that does the trick of keeping words
together? Or maybe the compound tokenizer has this option? (check Lucene JIRA,
not sure now where the compound tokenizer went)
Otis
--
Hello,
I'm sure these questions have been raised a million times, I'll try one
more:
1/ Is there any general-purpose, free, French synonyms file out there?
2/ Is there a Solr or Lucene analyser class that could tap an on-line
resource for synoynms at index-time? And by the same token,
Pierre,
1) I don't know, but a good place to check and see what previous answers to
this questions were is markmail.org
2) I don't think there is such a thing, but I also don't think there are sites
that make this data freely available (answer to 1?)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/
Synonyms are domain-specific, so general-purpose lists are not very useful.
Ultraseek shipped a British-American synonym list as an example, but even
that wasn't very general. One of our customers was a chemical company and
was very surprised when the search rocket fuel suggested arugula,
even
I apologize for spamming this mailing list with my problems, but I'm at my
wits end. I'll get right to the point.
I have an xml file which is ~1GB which I wish to index. If that is
successful, I will move to a larger file of closer to 20GB. However, when I
run my data-config(let's call it
: When I check my commit.log nothings is runned
commit.log is only updated by the bin/commit script ... not by Solr
itself. you'll see Solr log commits in whatever logs are kept by your
servlet container.
: My snapshooter too: but no log in snapshooter.log
: !-- A postCommit event is
True, synonyms can be grouped in cliques based on the strength of their
resemblence given a specific context.
But what I'm indexing is the text content of TV programs produced by a
public television, so the context is very large and non-specific. What I
want is to find automobile for car,
My unique key field is an MD5 hash of several other fields that represent
identity of documents in my index. We've been calculating this externally
and setting the key value in documents but have found recurring bugs as the
number and variety of inserting consumers has grown...
So I wanted to
Hi All,
I wrote a customized query parser which discards non-schema fields
from the query (I'm using the schema field names from
req.getSchema().getFields().keySet() ) .
This parser works fine in unit tests.
But still I have an error from the webapp when I try to query my
schema with non
It may not be all that relevant but our Update handler extends from
DirectUpdateHandler2.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Calculated-Unique-Key-Field-tp19747955p19748032.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: That's why I was wondering how Dismax breaks it all apart. It makes sense...I
: suppose what I'd like to have is a way to tell dismax which fields NOT to
: tokenize the input for. For these fields, it would pass the full q instead of
: each part of it. Does this make sense? would it be useful
: Question : Is it possible to do the same for String type or not, since the
StrField doesn't support an analyzer like TextField does, but if you
define string to be a TextField using KeywordTokenizer it will preserve
the whole value as a single token and you can then use the
: has anyone had the need and maybe already written a munin plugin to graph
: some informations from e.g. admin/stats.jsp ?
: Something like that, though I havn't seen anything available publicly yet. Its
Anything exposed via stats.jsp should also be available via JMX (if you
enable JMX) ...
How would I write a custom Similarity factor that overrides the TF
function? Is there some documentation on that somewhere?
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 2008, at 2:10 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
It might be easiest to store the thread ID
Hmm, strange.
This is Solr 1.3.0, right? Do you have any transformers applied to these
multi-valued fields? Do you have stream=true in the entity?
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:01 PM, KyleMorrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I apologize for spamming this mailing list with my problems, but I'm at my
Hi,
The suggested approach with a TokenFilter extending the BufferedTokenStream
class works fine, performance is OK - the external stemmer is now invoked
only once for the complete search text. Also, from a functional point of
view, the approach is useful, because it allows for other filtering
The easiest thing is to look at Lucene javadoc and look for Similarity and
DefaultSimilarity classes. Then have a peek at Lucene contrib to get some
other examples of custom Similarity. You'll just need to override one method,
for example:
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene -
As a follow up: I continued tweaking the data-config.xml, and have been able
to make the commit fail with as little as 3 fields in the sdc.xml, with only
one multivalued field. Even more strange, some fields work and some do not.
For instance, in my dc.xml:
field column=Taxon
I hit ctrl-S by mistake. This is the method you are after:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_3_2/api/core/org/apache/lucene/search/DefaultSimilarity.html#tf(float)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Jérôme Etévé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But still I have an error from the webapp when I try to query my
schema with non existing fields in my query ( like foo:bar ).
I'm wondering if the query q is parsed in a very simple way somewhere
else (and independently
the time factor has more to do with teh number of distinct values in the
field being faceted on then it does the number of documents. with 1
million documents there are probably a lot more indexed terms in the
contents field then there are with only 1000 documents.
As an inverted index,
not really. facet.query filters the result set. Here we need to filter the
facet counts by multiple facet prefixes. facet.query would work only if the
faceted field is not a multi-value field.
Erik Hatcher wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, doesn't facet.query accomplish what you want?
I guess it is a threading problem. I can give you a patch. you can raise a bug
--Noble
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:11 AM, KyleMorrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a follow up: I continued tweaking the data-config.xml, and have been able
to make the commit fail with as little as 3 fields in the
this patch is created from 1.3 (may apply on trunk also)
--Noble
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it is a threading problem. I can give you a patch. you can raise a bug
--Noble
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:11 AM, KyleMorrison [EMAIL
Hi guys,
In the URL, http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=
:bobversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onwt=json
q=: applies to a field and not to an entity. So If I have 3 entities
like:
dataConfig
dataSource **/
document
entity
32 matches
Mail list logo
