have u commited the data,
use *:* query to see that data is commited yet or not
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-results-after-importing-from-Dih-tp1365720p1365927.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Check your index folder, does it contains files other than segment files?
If yes then your data is in index, then you need to commit it.
Try restart your solr.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-results-after-importing-from-Dih-tp1365720p1366104.html
Sent
HI all,
iam using solr 1.4.0
recently i observed in my solr logs that because of the invalid userName
i got java.sql.SQLException: Access denied for user '1234'@'localhost
i resolved this but iam not able to capture this in my code .
how can i catch the SqlEXceptions in Solr-DataImport
Hello all,
is there a way in solr to directly set the norm value for fields?
I have been using index time boost values so far, but they just are one part of
norm value calculation.
How can I influence that?
Kind regards
Michael
Thank you so much for valuable suggestions
this is the query im using
q=swingline red stapler hammer hand
rigidfl=nameqt=standard1rows=35debugQuery=true
here is my output, as you can see close to last records, Swingline Stapler
scored more than Swingline Red Stapler - 747 series, but I want
Hi Micheal,
have a look at SweetSpotSimilarity (Lucene).
Kind regards,
- Mitch
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/full-control-over-norm-values-tp1366910p1367462.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
check is there any file other than segments file.
if yes then your data is in index, commit it.
try restart solr.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-results-after-importing-from-Dih-tp1365720p1368560.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
You cannot divide a document into sections as far as i know. You could,
however, store divisions in different fields, if your use-case allows this,
and retrieve only the fields that you need. This way you can avoid downloading
20MiB at once.
On Friday 27 August 2010 11:26:05 maheshkumar wrote:
That would be Solr 4.0, or maybe 3.1 first.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr3.1
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr4.0
On Thursday 26 August 2010 23:58:25 Charlie Jackson wrote:
There seem to be a few parallel efforts at putting Solr in a cloud
configuration. See
No. Solr doesn't require a unique ID nor is an auto incrementing value really
useful in indices spanning multiple machines. Maybe SOLR-308 could help you
out but then the question remains, why would you need a feature like this?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-308
On Friday 27
No there is no such feature,your indexing component have to keep generation
of ids
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-ID-for-Documents-indexed-tp1367972p1369051.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It's just a configured filter, so you should be able to define it twice. Have
you tried it? But it might be tricky, the output from the first will be the
input of the second so i doubt the usefulness of this approach.
On Thursday 26 August 2010 17:45:45 Shawn Heisey wrote:
Can I pass my
Oh, wait.
If you do not have to have sequential, but only unique keys, you can use the
UUIDType.
You can set SOLR to handle this and generate the field ids for you.
Works great for me.
[]s,
Lucas Frare Teixeira .·.
- lucas...@gmail.com
- lucastex.com.br
- blog.lucastex.com
-
this link will help you:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-few-query-issues-with-solr-tp1358081p1369261.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Hi,
Version 1.4.1 does not support the SolrCloud style sharding. In 1.4.1, please
use this style:
shards=localhost:8983/solr/aaprivate,localhost:8983/solr/aapublic/
However, since schema is the same, I'd opt for one index with a collections
field as the filter.
You can add that field to your
For solving the car/car-rent issue you'll need to add a SynonymFilter to your
analyzer chain and configure it accordingly.
On Friday 27 August 2010 13:40:15 hemantverm...@gmail.com wrote:
this link will help you:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.WordDelimi
Yes, this is really a pain sometimes.
I'd prefer a well defined base path, which could be assumed everywhere unless
otherwise documented.
SolrHome is one natural choice. For backward compat we could add a config in
solr(config).xml to easily switch to old behaviour.
Also, it makes sense to
Hi
In a multiValued field, I want to write a query that returns all the documents
that actually have more than 1 value in that field. (don't care what the value
is).
Maybe this should be obvious, but I just can't think of how to formulate such a
query.
Any help?
Thanks,
Brad
My recommendation is if you need to query on something, index it as
you need... so in this case index another field with the number of
values in that field. This is easy if you're writing a custom
indexer, but maybe not so trivial if you're indexing other ways - so a
custom update
Thanks so much, I really appreciate your help!
Have a great weekend!
Xiaohui
-Original Message-
From: Jan Høydahl / Cominvent [mailto:jan@cominvent.com]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 7:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to deal with virtual collection in solr?
Thank you, Jan Høydahl.
I used
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?shards=localhost:8983/solr/aaprivate,localhost:8983/solr/aapublic/.
I got a error Missing solr core name in path. I have aapublic and aaprivate
cores. I also got a error if I used
Hi,
I have one Text fileld in our schema i want to do the sorting for that column.
field name=TITLE type=text indexed=true stored=true /
field name=UPDBY type=text indexed=true stored=true /
I have these two columns i want to use the SORT for these two columns.
any one can please suggest what
What seems to be the problem? Did you consult the wiki on this matter?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#sort
On Friday 27 August 2010 15:14:06 deepak agrawal wrote:
Hi,
I have one Text fileld in our schema i want to do the sorting for that
column.
field name=TITLE
the 'text' fieldType is not suitable for sorting. You need to use the
copyField directive in your schema and at indexing time copy the data to
your TITLE and UPDBY fields, and you need to create 2 new fields:
field name=TITLE_sort type=string indexed=true stored=true /
field name=UPDBY_sort
Hey Robert,
Just wondering if you ever got to solve this problem?
We are facing a similar issue with our catalog search :(
look forward to hearing from you.
-Thanks,
Muneeb
--
View this message in context:
I don't understand your use-case behind this question. Even displaying
2M is still more than most users want. Can you explain what you're
trying to accomplish?
If you're trying to show just some context around the search terms,
highlighting might help.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:04
I agree with Marcus, the usefulness of passing through WDF twice
is suspect. You can always do a copyfield to a completely different
field and do whatever you want there, copyfield forks the raw input
to the second field, not the analyzed stream...
What is it you're really trying to accomplish?
Hi all,
I'm wondering how to handle following scenario:
There is a pool of data which can be searched by all users via a web
interface. Now some users would like to add own documents, or private fields
to existing documents which shall not be accessable by others.
Concerning private fields
.. I
my feeling is that private fields in a public document will be the hardest
nut to crack, unless you have an intermediary layer that users call instead
of hitting your solr instance directly. If you front it with a web service
you could handle various authorization scenarios a little easier.
User security tends to change often. You may find it easier to use
user/role security. You could create a unique role for a user's docs
and store that role instead. You need a separate user-role database.
Later, the user can choose to share docs with someone else and you
would then change the
Early Bird Registration for Surge Scalability Conference 2010 ends next
Tuesday, August 31. We have a killer lineup of speakers and architects
from across the Internet. Listen to experts talk about the newest
methods and technologies for scaling your Web presence.
On further investigation: DocumentBuilder.loadStoredFields() is used
in one utility function which is only called from one unit test. This
should be considered dead code. Don't use it.
SolrPluginUtils.docListToSolrDocument()
SolrPluginUtilsTest.testDocListConversion()
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at
I have a field popularity that is changing frequently. So I'd like to put it
in an ExternalFileField.
If I do that, can I still use popularity in a boosted query such as:
{!boost b=log(popularity)}foo
Thanks.
You might be better off starting with the Lucene CheckIndex program.
It walks all of the Lucene index data structures. I have done
forensics by fiddling with the CheckIndex code.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/24/2010 6:30 AM, Sascha Szott wrote:
To make a dictionary with a 'minimum document count' you need to make
the dictionary from the facets. Facets will create this for you; but
will allocate memory for every last term. The last N facets will have
the smallest # of terms.
To get term counts for hundreds of millions of terms, I think
35 matches
Mail list logo