James: everything you said made perfect sense, and in hindsight was
actually covered on the page -- it was just hte example that was bogus in
light of the current config defaults
I went ahead and fixed it based on your feedback, and beefed up the
explanation of spellcheck.collateParam.* (now
Thanks, Chris. I just needed to stare at the code I already knew about more
intently to see what was really going on. It's super convoluted and super
confusing. The keys were the handleResponses method in the main component
class and the AbstractStatsValues class that is hidden in the
Thank you so much Alex and Joel for your ideas. I am pouring through the
documentation and code now to try an understand it all. A post filter sounds
promising. As 99% of my doc fields are character based I should try to
compliment the collapsing Q parser with an option that compares string
fields
Problem:
While migrating the solr version from 3.X(schema version is 1.4) to cloud
4.10.0 (schema version 1.5), I see a difference in the way the
worddelimiterfilter works for the below configuration
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
generateWordParts=1generateNumberParts=1
Hi,
Just wanted to know if it's possible to provide conditions with a
function query. Right now,I'm using the following functions to boost on
Likes data.
bf=recip(ms(NOW/DAY,PublishDate),3.16e-11,1,1)^2.0 sum(Likes,2)
What I would like to do is to apply the boost on Likes based on source.
Yes, I wanted to get rid of merge step. But looks like merge is not that
cumbersome either. Thanks Mikhail and Erick for pointers, that helped.
Jaikit
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 8:24 AM, Erick Erickson
erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
You certainly can't do this into a single
did you build the spellcheck index using spellcheck.build as described
here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spell+Checking ?
-Mike
On 01/14/2015 07:19 AM, Dhanesh Radhakrishnan wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
As you mentioned in the previous mail I changed
Hi,
You could try passing luceneMatchVersion argument to WordDelimiterFilterFactory
and see if it works for you.
Factory returns Lucene47WordDelimiterFilter before LUCENE_4_8_0.
Ahmet
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 11:10 PM, gouthsmsimhadri
gouthamsimha...@gmail.com wrote:
Problem:
While
Thanks Ahmet, that works.
-
-goutham
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/WordDelimiter-Works-differently-in-solr3X-vs-SolrCloud-tp4179647p4179662.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: As a foolish dev (not malicious I hope!), I did mess around with something
: like this once; I was writing my own Codec. I found I had to create a file
: called META-INF/services/org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec in my solr plugin jar
: that contained the fully-qualified class name of my codec: I
Nest them perhaps?
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:07 PM, shamik sham...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Eric, I did take a look at the if condition earlier, but not sure
how that can be used for multiple conditions. It works for a single
condition :
if(termfreq(Source2,'A'),sum(Likes,3),0)
Why won't the if clause work? See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Function+Queries
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Shamik Bandopadhyay sham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to know if it's possible to provide conditions with a
function query. Right now,I'm using the
Thanks Eric, I did take a look at the if condition earlier, but not sure
how that can be used for multiple conditions. It works for a single
condition :
if(termfreq(Source2,'A'),sum(Likes,3),0)
But for multiple, I'm struggling to find the right syntax. I tried using OR
in conjunction but hasn't
Hello,
I am running Solr (4.10) in cloud mode by configuring multiple collections (1
for each day). Structure is as shown below. I can fetch documents for given
query, if I query individual collection. However when I send distributed
request to multiple shards, I only see numFound and no
It's what Java has, whatever that is:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/regex/Pattern.html
So, maybe the correct answer is neither, but similar to both.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:06 AM, tomas.kalas kala...@email.cz wrote:
Oh yeah, that is it. Thank you very
Iam using solr 4.7 and solr php client.
Back to original question, I've missed it. ComplexPhraseQueryParser is not
available in Solr 4.7, so sorry for misleading information.
Regards,
Tomoko
2015-01-14 23:44 GMT+09:00 Tomoko Uchida tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com:
Hi Adrien,
No, you cannot
Hi Adrien,
No, you cannot use ComplexPhraseQueryParser in Solr 3.3.0 since this was
introduced at Solr 4.8 (it's a pretty new feature...)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604
お邪魔しました。
You do not need this phrase here, we rarely use this in mails. :)
Thanks,
Tomoko
2015-01-14 23:19
Hi all,
I had done following configuration to test Solr grouping concept.
solr version : 4.6.1 (tried in latest version 4.10.3 also)
Schema : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124357616
Solrj code to insert docs :http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124381116
Response Group's :
as my problem is changed completely from first post so i had created new
thread for that.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com wrote:
just wanted to share schema and results for same :
solr version : 4.6.1
Schema : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124357616
We all need example data, and a sample query to help you.
You can use group to group by a field and remove dupes.
If you want to remove dupes you can do something like:
q=field1:DOG AND NOT field2:DOG AND NOT field3:DOG
That will remove DOG from field2 or field3.
If you don't care if it is in
It was because I did not have unique id's in my index. I added that and it
worked. Also it is mentioned as one of the requirement for Distributed Search.
Thanks,Jaikit
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:53 AM, Jaikit Savla
jaikit.sa...@yahoo.com wrote:
Folks,
I have set up 3 cores
Hello,
I am running SOLR 4.10.0 on Tomcat 8.
The solr.xml file in .../apache-tomcat-8.0.15_solr_8983/conf/Catalina/localhost
looks like this:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
Context docBase=/archives/solr/example/solr/solr.war debug=0
crossContext=true
Environment name=solr/home
You certainly can't do this into a single directory, there would be
zillions of name conflicts.
I believe I saw Uwe make a comment on the Lucene list about using
MultiReaders and
keeping the sub-indexes in different directories, but that's
lower-level than Solr has access to
Plus, you'd have to
Does anybody know for sure whether the stats component fully supports
distributed mode? It is listed in the doc as supporting distributed mode
(at least for old, non-SolrCloud distrib mode), but... I don't see any code
that actually does that. Nor any tests, unless they are hidden somewhere I
Hello,
Can someone pass on the hints to get around following error? Is there any Heap
Size parameter I can set in Tomcat or in Solr webApp that gets deployed in Solr?
I am running Solr webapp inside Tomcat on my local machine which has RAM of 12
GB. I have PDF document which is 4 GB max in
Yep, you'll have to increase the heap size for your Tomcat container.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6897476/tomcat-7-how-to-set-initial-heap-size-correctly
Michael Della Bitta
Senior Software Engineer
o: +1 646 532 3062
appinions inc.
“The Science of Influence Marketing”
18 East 41st
As a foolish dev (not malicious I hope!), I did mess around with
something like this once; I was writing my own Codec. I found I had to
create a file called META-INF/services/org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec in
my solr plugin jar that contained the fully-qualified class name of my
codec: I
: Does anybody know for sure whether the stats component fully supports
: distributed mode? It is listed in the doc as supporting distributed mode
it's been supported for as long as i can remember -- since Day 1 of the
StatsComponent i believe.
: (at least for old, non-SolrCloud distrib mode),
I use the same user every time and the /logs directory and everything in it is
owned by that user. I get the same problem occasionally developing on my Ubuntu
14.10 laptop as well, and all the files in the solr directory are owned by me
on that machine (and I run Solr as me there as well).
Folks,
I have generated multiple (count of 100) sharded Lucene indexes on Hadoop and
they are of format. The total indexed data (sum of all the index-*) is of size
500GB and hence the number of shards.drwxr-x--- 2 index-66drwxr-x--- 2
index-68drwxr-x--- 2 index-9
and each index
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Jaikit Savla
jaikit.sa...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
Now to load this index, I am currently using Lucene IndexMergeTool to
merge all the shards into one giant index. My question is, is there a way
to load shared index without merging into one giant index on to
This solution will merge the index as well. I want to find out if merge is
required before loading indexes onto Solr ? If that is possible than I can
just point solrconfig.xml to directory where I have all the shards.
Jaikit
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:11 AM, Mikhail Khludnev
HI
Iam using solr 4.7 and solr php client.
So heres the issue ,i have data indexed in solr
eg
mist spa
I have applied fuzzy to my search and If i search myst or mysty i get the
correct result i get mist spa in result.
But if i write mysty spa or must spa i do not get ant results.Iam not able
It should replace all occurrences of the pattern. Post your specific filter
XML. Patterns can be very tricky.
Use the Solr Admin UI analysis page to see how the filtering is occurring.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:16 AM, tomas.kalas kala...@email.cz wrote:
Jack, thanks for
just wanted to share schema and results for same :
solr version : 4.6.1
Schema : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124357616
Code :http://www.imagesup.net/?di=10142124381116
Response Group : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=1114212438351
Response Terms : http://www.imagesup.net/?di=614212438580
Folks,
I have set up 3 cores in a single collection and they all have same schema but
different index. I have set unique Id required field to false.field name=id
type=string indexed=true stored=true required=false/
When I run query against single core, it works fine. But when I add the shard
Thanks much, now i got better idea on stored indexed works internally in
solr.
From this i tried and modified few things to understand grouping logic.
*Schema :*
field name=tenant_pool type=text stored=true *indexed=true*/
field name=type type=text stored=true indexed=true/
*Code :*
SolrQuery q
Can u get raw SOLR response?
For me grouping works exactly the way u expect it to work.
Try direct query in browser to be sure the problem is not in your code.
http://192.168.0.1:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=*:*group=truegroup.field=tenant_pool
--
View this message in context:
I just used Solr UI Analyzer for my test, or must i indexed it firstly?
I used this XML code in my schema:
fieldType name=direction1 class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer
charFilter class=solr.PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory
I was suspecting it might do that - the pattern is greedy and takes the
longest matching pattern. Add a question mark after the asterisk to use
stingy mode that matches the shortest pattern.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:37 AM, tomas.kalas kala...@email.cz wrote:
I just used Solr
Jaikit,
uniq key is mandatory for distributed search. if most of your docs have ids
assigned, you can drop remaining ones by adding something like ..fq=id:[*
TO *]
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Jaikit Savla
jaikit.sa...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
Folks,
I have set up 3 cores in a single
I tried what you said also appended group.ngroups=true and got same result
not expected onengroups coming is 1.
i am on solr-4.6.1 single machine default setup.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Norgorn lsunnyd...@mail.ru wrote:
Can u get raw SOLR response?
For me grouping works exactly
Hi,
I suspect you are likely to misunderstand fuzzy search.
You should append ~N to end of each query term, not whole query string /
phrase.
(You can debug your query and get useful information by specifying
debugQuery=true parameter, try it if you have not.)
At first glance, I guess Complex
Jack, thanks for help, but if i used PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory for
example for this :
d1text d1/d1d2text d2/d2d1text d1/d1d2text 2 ok/d2 then at
output i only get segment d2text 2 ok/d2 when is d2 text d2/d2
between marks d1 ./d1.d2.../d2 d1.../d1so the filter
probably takes only first
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
As you mentioned in the previous mail I changed buildOnCommit=false in
solrConfig.
After that change, suggestions are not working.
In Solr 4.7 introduced a new approach based on a dedicated SuggestComponent
I'm using that component to build suggestions and lookup
Oh yeah, that is it. Thank you very much for your patience. And a last
question at the end what type regEx Solr actually using ? POSIX or PCRE ?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Tokenizer-or-Filter-tp4178346p4179505.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Tomokoさん、おはようございます。
Can I use ComplexPhraseQueryParser with Core Solr 3.3.0 ?
どうもありがとうございます。
お邪魔しました。
宜しくお願いします。
Bien cordialement,
ルフフィエ アドリエン
Adrien Ruffié
LD : +33 1 73 03 26 40
Tél : +33 1 73 03 29 80
E-DEAL
Innover la Relation Client
-Message d'origine-
De : Tomoko Uchida
47 matches
Mail list logo
