Hi Gauri,
Can you give more details on when this happens? Which Solr version?
Also, can you please post the full stack trace?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Gauri Shankar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need a bit of your help as we recently encountering an issue related to
>
Hi,
Sorry for letting this thread hanging, I was out of office last week.
I have managed to make it work using this query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/testscoring/select?q={!parent%20which=type_s:product%20score=max}+color_s:Red^=0%20AND%20{!func}price_i=json=true=score,*,[docid]=true
for the
Thanks much Shalin for this.
I will take a look into this one.
Btw, I am using SolrCloud 4.7.0.
Thanks again.
Gauri
On Sep 16, 2015 12:44 PM, "Shalin Shekhar Mangar"
wrote:
> Okay, I found the problem, see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6547
>
> I have
Taking a look to your request :
GET
/solr/EventLog/spellCheckCompRH?qt=%2FspellCheckCompRH=Some+more+text+wit+some+missspelled+wordz.=on=true
You call :
*Solr Core ( Collection)* : EventLog
*Request handler* : spellCheckCompRH
*Qt parameter* ( legacy to specify the request handler) :
Hi All,
There's currently a five second delay in the bin/solr script when
stopping a Solr instance before it's forcefully killed. In our
experience this is not enough to allow a graceful shutdown of an active
SolrCloud node and it seems a bit brutal to kill the process in the
middle of
Okay, I found the problem, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6547
I have committed a fix which should be released with Solr 5.4. In the
mean while, if you need access to the qtime for such responses,
instead of using response.getQTime() do the following:
int qtime = -1;
NamedList
On 9/15/2015 6:49 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>From the information we have, we cannot tell if this is a problem
request or not. Do you have a core/collection named "EventLog" on your
Solr server? It will be case sensitive. If you do, does that config
have a handler named "spellCheckCompRH" in
Hi All,
I wanted to understand the difference between CustomScoreQuery and
RankQuery. From the outside, it seems they do the same thing with RankQuery
having more functionality.
Am I missing something?
Parvesh Garg
Can you post us the schema description of the fields you are using for
spellchecking ?
Are you using numeric fields to get the suggestions from ? ( which should
be quite weird)
Cheers
2015-09-16 12:22 GMT+01:00 Mark Fenbers :
> On 9/15/2015 6:49 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
Hi,
The wiki explains how to upload the security.json file to Zk (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Authentication+and+Authorization+Plugins
).
However, is it possible to use authentication and authorization plugin in a
not SolrCloud environment ? If yes, where has to be located
I'm no expert, but one of the neat things about RankQuery is that you
can implement your own collector, and spit out documents that are *not*
in score order. One use case I came across for which we used this was
"do not display items from the same supplier within 4 results of each
other". This
Any update on this ?
Cheers
2015-08-21 0:22 GMT+01:00 Shawn Heisey :
> On 7/8/2015 6:13 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Shawn Heisey
> wrote:
> >> After the fix (with luceneMatchVersion at 4.9), both "aaa" and "bbb" end
> >>
You should first run the query on the parent domain ( give me all the books
or a limited set of them).
Then you should do the faceting on the children domain.
>From Yonik blog :
"
$ curl http://localhost:8983/solr/demo/query -d '
q=cat_s:(sci-fi OR fantasy)=id,title_t&
json.facet={
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/spelling/AbstractLuceneSpellChecker.java#L97
this mean that
0.5
should be replaced to
0.5
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> See this:
>
> Caused by:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Florin Mandoc wrote:
> Is possible to to also add "name_s:expensive" search term in q? I know i
> can add it to fq but I will have no score boost.
Sure you can. But beware of query syntax trap. It's explained by David
Smiley at comment
On 9/16/2015 5:24 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
As a reference I always suggest :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spell+Checking
I read this doc and have found it moderately helpful to my current
problem. But I have at least one question about it, especially given
that my
Indeed! should be changed to in the "Spell Checking"
document
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spell+Checking) and in
all the baseline solrconfig.xml files provided in the distribution. In
addition, ' internal' should be
removed/changed in the same document and same
See this:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Float cannot be cast
to java.lang.String
at
org.apache.solr.spelling.AbstractLuceneSpellChecker.init(AbstractLuceneSpellChecker.java:97)
AbstractLuceneSpellChecker is expecting a string, but getting a float.
Can you paste here
Ah ha!! Exactly my point in the post I sent about the same time you did
(same Thread)!
Mark
On 9/16/2015 8:03 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/spelling/AbstractLuceneSpellChecker.java#L97
this mean that
0.5
On 9/16/2015 5:42 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
> Any update on this ?
I found two workarounds, and went with the second one -- removing the
PatternReplaceFilterFactory from fieldType definitions that also include
WDF. They are both documented in the issue:
On 9/16/2015 12:52 AM, Ere Maijala wrote:
> There's currently a five second delay in the bin/solr script when
> stopping a Solr instance before it's forcefully killed. In our
> experience this is not enough to allow a graceful shutdown of an active
> SolrCloud node and it seems a bit brutal to
Hi,
Sending it to Solr group in addition to Ivy group.
I have been building Solr trunk (
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/) using "ant eclipse" from
quite some time but this week i am on a job where things are behind the
firewall and a proxy is used.
Issue: When not in company
Greetings!
Mikhail Khludnev, in his post to the thread "Google didn't help on this
one!", has pointed out one bug in Solr-5.3.0, and I was able to uncover
another one (which I wrote about in the same thread). Therefore, and
thankfully, I've been able to get past my configuration issues.
So
Raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8063
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Mark Fenbers wrote:
> Indeed! should be changed to in the "Spell Checking"
> document (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spell+Checking)
> and in all the baseline
The not-very-helpful answer is that you're using the core admin API in
a SolrCloud setup. Please do not do this as (you're well aware of this by now!)
it's far too easy to get "interesting" results.
Instead, use the Collections API, specifically the ADDREPLICA and DELETEREPLICA
commands. Under
Have you used jconsole or visualvm to see what it is actually hanging on to
there? Perhaps it is lock files that are not cleaned up or something else?
You might try: find ~/.ivy2 -name "*.lck" -type f -exec rm {} \;
- Mark
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:50 AM Susheel Kumar
Have you looked at the group by options? See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Sreekant Sreedharan
wrote:
> I have a requirement to group documents by count based on a particular field:
>
> So for
Top level queries need a *:* in front, something like
q=*:* -usrlatlong_0_coordinate:[* TO *]
I just took a quick check and just using usrlatlong:[* TO *]
encounters a parse error.
P.S. It would help if you told us what you _did_ receive
when you tried your options. Parse errors? All docs?
Hello,
We are trying to move away from Master-Slave configuration to a
SolrCloud environment. I have a couple of questions. Currently in the
Master-Slave setup we have 4 Machines 2 of which are indexers and 2 of them
are query servers. The query servers are fronted via Load Balancer.
Absolutely. You can have a collection with just replicas and no shards for
redundancy and have a load balancer in front of it that removes the
dependency on a single node. One of them will assume the role of a leader,
and in case that leader goes down, one of the replicas will be elected as a
Hi,
I try to follow:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Basic+Authentication+Plugin,
to protect Solr 5.2 Admin with password, but I have not been able to secure.
1) When I run the following command:
curl --user solr:SolrRocks http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/authentication
-H
Hi Mark,
Solr allows you to provide more than one spellchecker to be used together
to provide the corrections.
This means you can provide a set of suggestions from your index and one
from an external system.
Anyway you need to provide it as a File, Solr doesn't have an automatic set
of suggestions
Hello all,
I have a SolrJ bean annotated with @Field. Is it possible to omit a
field prior to index? For instance:
*My bean*
@Field
public String f1;
@Field
public String f2;
@Field
public String f3;
*My indexing*
client.addBean(this);
I want the resulting document to omit f2, so it would
Solr Grouping is unlike to generate the response like that directly.
Solr group response result is grouped by field, while you want FLAT format
result.
Flattern result self should be easy task, but may cause another problem,
how to control Navigation/Pagination behavior? that depends on your
On 9/16/2015 9:32 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Have you used jconsole or visualvm to see what it is actually hanging on to
> there? Perhaps it is lock files that are not cleaned up or something else?
>
> You might try: find ~/.ivy2 -name "*.lck" -type f -exec rm {} \;
If that does turn out to be the
Basic authentication (and the API support, that you're trying to use) was
only released with 5.3.0 so it wouldn't work with 5.2.
5.2 only had the authentication and authorization frameworks, and shipped
with Kerberos authentication plugin out of the box.
There are a few known issues with that
That is, use a TextField plus a KeywordTokenizerFactory, rather than a
StringField
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015, at 09:03 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> If you want to analyse a string field, use the KeywordTokenizer - it
> just passes the whole field through as a single tokenizer.
>
> Does that get you there?
If you want to analyse a string field, use the KeywordTokenizer - it
just passes the whole field through as a single tokenizer.
Does that get you there?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015, at 08:52 PM, Jie Gao wrote:
> I understand that i can configure "solr.PhoneticFilterFactory" for both
> indexing and
You'll have to say numShards=1 and replicationFactor=2.
http://
[hostname]:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE=test=test=1=2
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Ravi Solr wrote:
> Thank you very much for responding Sameer so numShards=0 and
> replicationFactr=4 if I
I just gave an example API call, but for your scenario, the
replicationFactor will be 4 (replicationFactor=4). In this way, all 4
machines will have the same copy of the data and you can put an LB in front
of those 4 machines.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Ravi Solr
I understand that i can configure "solr.PhoneticFilterFactory" for both
indexing and query time for "solr.TextField". However, i want to query a
list of term (indexed and stored) from a field ordered by phonetic
similarity, which can be easily done by most of relational database.
Term Component
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015, at 06:37 PM, Jie Gao wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I want to query a list of terms indexed and stored in multivalued string
> field via Term Component. The term component can support exact matching
> and
> regex based fuzzy matching. However, Is any way i can configure scheme to
>
OK...I understood numShards=1, when you say replicationFactor=2 what does
it mean ? I have 4 machines, then, only 3 copies of data (1 at leader and 2
replicas) ?? so am i not under utilizing one machine ?
I was more thinking in the lines of a Mesh connectivity format i.e.
everybody has others
Thank you very much for responding Sameer so numShards=0 and
replicationFactr=4 if I have 4 machines ??
Thanks
Ravi Kiran Bhaskar
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Sameer Maggon
wrote:
> Absolutely. You can have a collection with just replicas and no shards for
>
This is a very strange error. I have another index (nearly identical
solrconfig.xml and similar schema) running Solr 4.9.1 on Oracle JDK 8u60
which works perfectly. Those systems are running Ubuntu 14.
Sending to a different index on different servers running under Oracle
JDK 7u72 on CentOS 6
Hi Team,
Can you please help me understand the following usage of below mentioned
jar files, in apache Solr 5.3.0,
1. Tagsoup 1.2.1
2. Junit4-ant v 2.1.13
3. com.googlecode.juniversalchardet v1.0.3
2. Is it right to ask , can we rebuild solr 5.3.0 without/replacing
above mentioned files?
Many thanks for your suggestion.
It works well for querying the field with phonetic matching and responses a
list of docs tagged with the term.
However, is there any way that i can get a list of matched terms ? The
phonetic matching seems not work with Term Component (i'm using terms.regex
to
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015, at 10:47 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Can you please help me understand the following usage of below mentioned
> jar files, in apache Solr 5.3.0,
>
> 1. Tagsoup 1.2.1
> 2. Junit4-ant v 2.1.13
> 3. com.googlecode.juniversalchardet v1.0.3
>
>
> 2.
I bet the terms component does not analyse the terms, so you will need
to hand in already analysed phonetic terms. You could use the
http://localhost:8983/solr/YOUR-CORE/analysis/field URL to have Solr
analyse the field for you before passing it back to the term component.
Upayavira
On Wed, Sep
Ravi:
Sameer is correct on how to get it done in one go.
Don't get too hung up on replicationFactor. You can always
ADDREPLICA after the collection is created if you need to.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Sameer Maggon
wrote:
> I just gave an
How about in Denver?
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Otis Gospodnetić <
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> A slightly delayed reply ;)
> We are running Solr training in NYC next month -
> http://sematext.com/training/solr-training.html - 2nd seat is 50% off.
>
> Otis
> --
>
Not really. There are no lock files & even after cleaning up lock files (to
be sure) problem still persists. It works outside company network but
inside it stucks. let me try to see if jconsole can show something
meaningful.
Thanks,
Susheel
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Shawn Heisey
Hi,
I want to query a list of terms indexed and stored in multivalued string
field via Term Component. The term component can support exact matching and
regex based fuzzy matching. However, Is any way i can configure scheme to
do phonetic matching/query?
Thanks,
Jerry
I mention the same thing in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6743
They claim to have addressed this with Java delete on close stuff, but it
still happens even with 2.4.0.
Locally, I now use the nio strategy and never hit it.
- Mark
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:17 PM Shawn Heisey
You should be able to easily see where the task is hanging in ivy code.
- Mark
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM Susheel Kumar wrote:
> Not really. There are no lock files & even after cleaning up lock files (to
> be sure) problem still persists. It works outside company
55 matches
Mail list logo