Re: Send kill -9 to a node and can not delete down replicas with onlyIfDown.

What I'm doing is to simulate host crashed situation. Consider this, a host is not connected to the cluster. So, if a host crashed, I can not delete the down replicas by using onlyIfDown='true'. But in solr admin ui, it shows down for these replicas. And whiteout "onlyIfDown", it still show a

Re: Solr Cloud - how to implement local indexing without SSL and distributed search with SSL

On 7/17/2016 8:13 AM, Sarit Weber wrote: > We noticed that indexing is much faster without SSL, but we can not > remove it from distributed search. Solr doesn't handle the networking. That's Jetty. Jetty sets up one listening port, and that port either uses SSL or it doesn't. All requests for

Re: using lucene parser syntax with eDisMax

: Yes on both counts. Although it takes a bit of practice, if you add : =query to the query you'll see a section of the : response showing you exactly what the resulting query is after : all the rules are applied. In addition, something else about edismax that you might find useful (but isn't

Re: Solr dual core performance

I strongly suspect you're not getting "real" searches, but are hitting your query result cache or perhaps some other cache. 1.24ms response times are quite unusual. So check the Solr queryResultCache hit ratio, whether any fronting HTTP caching is being hit and the like would be my first step.

RE: Solr dual core performance

Most important information solr-spec 5.4.1 solr-impl 5.4.1 1725212 - jpountz - 2016-01-18 11:51:45 lucene-spec 5.4.1 lucene-impl 5.4.1 1725212 - jpountz - 2016-01-18 11:44:59 java version "1.7.0_79" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.5.6) (7u79-2.5.6-0ubuntu1.12.04.1) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server

Solr dual core performance

Hi All, I have Solr Server on hardware 60GB RAM split 50GB Solr RAM and the OS. The search index size is 120GB and built offline. There are no updates to this index. I have 2 cores setup, they are completely identical. Except they are on 2 different disk drives. The test run with the same 3

Re: Send kill -9 to a node and can not delete down replicas with onlyIfDown.

Thanks for taking the time for the detailed response. I completely get what you are saying. Makes sense. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:56 AM Erick Erickson wrote: > Justin: > > Well, "kill -9" just makes it harder. The original question > was whether a replica being

Re: Send kill -9 to a node and can not delete down replicas with onlyIfDown.

Justin: Well, "kill -9" just makes it harder. The original question was whether a replica being "active" was a bug, and it's not when you kill -9; the Solr node has no chance to tell Zookeeper it's going away. ZK does modify the live_nodes by itself, thus there are checks as necessary when a

Re: Find part of long query in shorter fields

Just for the records: After realizing that with „defType=dismax“ I really do get the expected output I’ve found out what I need to change in my edismax configuration: false Then this will work: > q=Braun Series 9 9095CC Men's Electric Shaver Wet/Dry with Clean and Renew > Charger > // edismax

Re: Node not recovering, leader elections not occuring

It sounds like the node-local version of the ZK clusterstate has diverged from the ZK cluster state. You should check the contents of zookeeper and verify the state there looks sane. I’ve had issues (v5.4) on a few occasions where leader election got screwed up to the point where I had to

Re: Send kill -9 to a node and can not delete down replicas with onlyIfDown.

Pardon me for hijacking the thread, but I'm curious about something you said, Erick. I always thought that the point (in part) of going through the pain of using zookeeper and creating replicas was so that the system could seamlessly recover from catastrophic failures. Wouldn't an OOM condition

Re: Node not recovering, leader elections not occuring

On the nodes that have the replica in a recovering state we now see: 19-07-2016 16:18:28 ERROR RecoveryStrategy:159 - Error while trying to recover. core=lookups_shard1_replica8:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: No registered leader was found after waiting for 4000ms , collection: lookups

Re: Node not recovering, leader elections not occuring

There are 11 collections, each only has one shard, and each node has 10 replicas (9 collections are on every node, 2 are just on one node). We're not seeing any OOM errors on restart. I think we're being patient waiting for the leader election to occur. We stopped the troublesome "leader that is

Re: Send kill -9 to a node and can not delete down replicas with onlyIfDown.

First of all, killing with -9 is A Very Bad Idea. You can leave write lock files laying around. You can leave the state in an "interesting" place. You haven't given Solr a chance to tell Zookeeper that it's going away. (which would set the state to "down"). In short when you do this you have to

config question (UNCLASSIFIED)

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED SOLR 6.1.0 + Nutch 2.3.1 works? Thanks, Kris ~~ Kris T. Musshorn FileMaker Developer - Contractor - Catapult Technology Inc. US Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground Application Management & Development Branch 410-278-7251

Re: Cold replication

The fact that your index is 200G is meaningless, assuming you're talking about disk size. Please just measure before you make assumptions about what will work, it'll save you a world of hurt. I'm not claiming that just using EBS will satisfy your need, but if you're swapping your search speed will

Re: SolrCloud - Query performance degrades with multiple servers(Shards)

15M docs may still comfortably fit in a single shard! I've seen up to 300M docs fit on a shard. Then again I've seen 10M docs make things unacceptably slow. You simply cannot extrapolate from 10K to 5M reliably. Put all 5M docs on the stand-alone servers and test _that_. Whenever I see numbers

Re: SolrCloud - Query performance degrades with multiple servers(Shards)

You may want to utilise Document routing (_route_) option to have your query serve faster but above you are trying to compare apple with oranges meaning your performance tests numbers have to be based on either your actual numbers like 3-5 million docs per shard or sufficient enough to see

Re: Node not recovering, leader elections not occuring

How many replicas per Solr JVM? And do you see any OOM errors when you bounce a server? And how patient are you being, because it can take 3 minutes for a leaderless shard to decide it needs to elect a leader. See SOLR-7280 and SOLR-7191 for the case where lots of replicas are in the same JVM,

Re: Parallel SQL where exists, in

There is a lot of activity in the ParallelSQL world, all being done by a very few people, so it's a matter of priorities. Can you consider submitting a patch? Best, Erick On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Pablo Anzorena wrote: > Hey, > > Is anyone willing to add the

Solr DIH

Cloud somebody help me to figure out my problem described below. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37946150/could-not-chain-dataimporthandler-and-schemaless-to-add-unknown-fields/37970809#37970809

Parallel SQL where exists, in

Hey, Is anyone willing to add the where exists and in clauses into paraller sql? Thanks.

Node not recovering, leader elections not occuring

Hi all - problem with a SolrCloud 5.5.0, we have a node that has most of the collections on it marked as "Recovering" or "Recovery Failed". It attempts to recover from the leader, but the leader responds with: Error while trying to recover.

AW: AW: group.facet=true and facet on field of type int -> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Exception during facet.field

Hi Tomás! Many thanks for responding - I agree, I'd say https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7495 is definitely the same issue. I am working around that issue by using a STR-Field and copyField. Thanks again, Sebastian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Re: index sql databases

On 7/19/2016 4:56 AM, kostali hassan wrote: > I am looking for display for each user: l'utilisateur est crée le > $date à $time not $document-> name est crée le $document->created You'll have to do that in your application that queries Solr, splitting the date and time information that it

Re: Solr Cloud - how to implement local indexing without SSL and distributed search with SSL

Hi again, Do you think it's possible to do that with server that will be dedicate to indexing and server that will be dedicate to search but will work on the same collections? Thanks, Sarit Weber Guardium Software Developer IBM Israel Software Labs, Jerusalem Phone: +972-2-649-1712 email:

Re: AW: group.facet=true and facet on field of type int -> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Exception during facet.field

Hi Sebastian, This looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7495 On Jul 19, 2016 3:46 AM, "Sebastian Riemer" wrote: > May I respectfully refer again to a question I posted last week? > > Thank you very much and a nice day to you all! > > Sebastian >

Re: index sql databases

I am looking for display for each user: l'utilisateur est crée le $date à $time not $document-> name est crée le $document->created 2016-07-18 16:48 GMT+01:00 Erick Erickson : > I don't see how that relates to the original > question. > > bq: when I display the field

More like this in solr5.4.1

I want introdius Morelikethis to get simmilaire document for each query. I had index rich data pds and msword I guess The fields to use for similarity is CONTENT used also for highlighting document content. In my case what is the best way to build mlt :MoreLikeThisHandler

Re: SolrCloud - Query performance degrades with multiple servers(Shards)

This is just for performance testing we have taken 10K records per shard. In live scenario it would be 30L-50L per shard. I want to search document from all shards, it will slow down and take too long time. I know in case of solr Cloud, it will query all shard node and then return result. Is

Re: Cold replication

Hi Mahmoud, What you can do is use local SSD disk as cache for EBS. You can try lvmcache or bcache. It will boost your performance while data will remain on EBS. Thanks, Emir -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr & Elasticsearch Support *

Re: SOLR Suggester | CFQ Variable | - not supported

Hi, Any update on this please. Thanks. On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Rajesh Kapur wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply. > > Yes, i tried to search by setting CFQ=abc\-def and also as "abc-def", but > no luck. > > Thanks. > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Erick

Re: Problem using bbox in schema

Sure, here it is: _id

Send kill -9 to a node and can not delete down replicas with onlyIfDown.

Hi all, Here's the situation. I'm using solr5.3 in cloud mode. I have 4 nodes. After use "kill -9 pid-solr-node" to kill 2 nodes. These replicas in the two nodes still are "ACTIVE" in zookeeper's state.json. The problem is, when I try to delete these down replicas with parameter

AW: group.facet=true and facet on field of type int -> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Exception during facet.field

May I respectfully refer again to a question I posted last week? Thank you very much and a nice day to you all! Sebastian - Hi all, Tested on Solr 6.1.0 (as well as 5.4.0 and 5.5.0) using the "techproducts" example the following