Re: Solr mm is field Level in case sow is false

HI Steve, I can’t use the copy field because i have multiple types of field ,which uses different type of data ,examples are 1. Normal Tokenized field (normal fields) 2. Word deliminated field 3. synonyms field (synonyms can be applied on one or two fields not all according to our requirement)

RE: Solr Spellcheck

No, This word is , cholera , is appearing in less than one percent. My corpus has about 80 docs and Cholera appears in less an 2000 docs. OK, I understand why it is showing that way. Can you please suggest suitable configuration for spell check to work correctly. I am indexing all the

Re: Solr mm is field Level in case sow is false

Hi Aman, see my responses inline below. > On Nov 28, 2017, at 9:11 PM, Aman Deep Singh > wrote: > > Thanks steve, > I got it but my problem is u can't make the every field with same analysis, I don’t understand: why can’t you use copy fields with all the same

Re: Solr mm is field Level in case sow is false

Thanks steve, I got it but my problem is u can't make the every field with same analysis, Is there any chance that sow and mm will work properly ,I don't see this in future pipe line also,as their is no jira related to this. Thanks , Aman deep singh On 28-Nov-2017 8:02 PM, "Steve Rowe"

Re: /export LongPointField

Looks like a duplicate of 10835, fixed in 6.7 (unreleased) and 7.0. Have you tried with any 7x versions? On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:08 PM, nandakishorek wrote: > My index has certain fields of type LongPointField with docValues=true i.e., > they are not multivalued. >

/export LongPointField

My index has certain fields of type LongPointField with docValues=true i.e., they are not multivalued. When I use the export handler to export the data, there is an exception thrown 'Export fields must either be one of the following types: int,float,long,double,string,date,boolean'. I see the

LTR model upload

When I upload, I can see my model when I hit "solr/collection_name/schema/model-store/" but when I reload the collection, it's gone. Is there a size limit for LTR models? I have a 1.6mb / 49,000 line long lambdamart model (that's what ranklib spit out for me) which I didn't think would be a

TemplateTransformer is not working for few new fields

Hello All, I have added two new fields to a entity in data-source-config.xml file. On running full-import it gets indexed fine and I can see the values for those two fields just like other fields. However on adding a nested entity under that entity and using a TemplateTransformer on nested

Re: OutOfMemoryError in 6.5.1

I’m pretty sure these OOMs are caused by uncontrolled thread creation, up to 4000 threads. That requires an additional 4 Gb (1 Meg per thread). It is like Solr doesn’t use thread pools at all. I set this in jetty.xml, but it still created 4000 threads. wunder Walter Underwood

Performance questions

Hi, We use Solr like a search engine / document store / database. We are currently optimizing a test environment and would welcome any relevant suggestions. I've taken a lot of time researching this mailing list and found a lot of relevant information. Here's our current setup : SolrCloud

RE: Solr Spellcheck

You spellcheck configurations are quite extensive ! In particular you specified : 0.01 This means that if the term appears in less than 1 % total docs it will be considered misspelled. Is cholera occurring in your corpus > 1% total docs ? - --- Alessandro Benedetti

Re: Huge Query execution time for multiple ORs

Hi Thx for all the replies. I think in any way tagging them is probably the best solution on any way. Best regards Am 28.11.2017 15:39 schrieb "Toke Eskildsen" : > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 11:07 +0100, Faraz Fallahi wrote: > > I have a question regarding solr queries. > > My query

Re: Does the schema api support xml requests?

Hi, The schema api does not support XML requests, and there are currently no plans I’m aware of to add support. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Nov 28, 2017, at 8:23 AM, startrekfan wrote: > > Hey > > Does the schema api supports xml requests? I tried to post a

Re: Huge Query execution time for multiple ORs

On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 11:07 +0100, Faraz Fallahi wrote: > I have a question regarding solr queries. > My query basically contains thousand of OR conditions for authors > (author:name1 OR author:name2 OR author:name3 OR author:name4 ...) > The execution time on my index is huge (around 15 sec).

Re: Solr mm is field Level in case sow is false

Hi Aman, From the last bullet in the “Caveats and remaining issues” section of m query-time multi-word synonyms blog: , in part: > sow=false changes the queries edismax produces over multiple fields when >

Does the schema api support xml requests?

Hey Does the schema api supports xml requests? I tried to post a xml formatted "add-field" but got an parser exception. Is there no xml support? Is it planned to add xml support within the next few months? Thanks

Solr mm is field Level in case sow is false

Hi, When sow is set to false then solr query is generated a little differently as compared to sow=true Solr version -6.6.1 User query -Asus ZenFone Go ZB5 Smartphone mm is set to 100% qf=nameSearch^7 brandSearch field definition 1. nameSearch—

Re: Huge Query execution time for multiple ORs

Long queries hurt Solr on many layers. You can experiment with https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_1/other-parsers.html#terms-query-parser On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Faraz Fallahi wrote: > Hi > > I have a question regarding solr queries. > My query

Huge Query execution time for multiple ORs

Hi I have a question regarding solr queries. My query basically contains thousand of OR conditions for authors (author:name1 OR author:name2 OR author:name3 OR author:name4 ...) The execution time on my index is huge (around 15 sec). When i tag all the associated documents with a custom field and

Re: Sort with subquery

No way. Subquery processes a cropped page of docs sorted before. Giving the subquery, you can use {!join score=Max ...}... see http://blog-archive.griddynamics.com/2015/08/scoring-join-party-in-solr-53.html On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Jinyi Lu wrote: > Hi all, > > I