Hi,
Is the size of phrases in index arbitrary or only two words? Do you need to
apply some standardisations on individual words? Depending on the answers
indexing will be different, but the goal is to index phrase as a single token
(might need some custom token filter). At search time, you do
Thank you for answer. We will improve our system based on what you said.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
bq: These errors only occur when we run this job from our remote job server
Maybe your remote job server is using a different set of jars than
your local one? How does the remote job server work?
No log snippets came through BTW, so I'm guessing a bit. The Apache
mail server is quite aggressive
On 3/1/2018 4:31 AM, 苗海泉 wrote:
My question is, what is the relationship between the number of threads
in the commitScheduler thread pool and what? The number of
searcherExecutor thread pool and the above have a relationship, why so
much, thank you!
I don't understand this question. Can you
The field type will also need to be in the schema:
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:00 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> You'll need to have this field in your schema:
>
>
>
> I'll check to see if the default schema used with solr start
You'll need to have this field in your schema:
I'll check to see if the default schema used with solr start -c has this
field, if not I'll add it. Thanks for pointing this out.
I checked and right now the random expression is only accepting one fq, but
I consider this a bug. It should accept
I'm interested in building a software system which will connect to various
document sources, extract the content from the documents contained within
each source, and make the extracted content available to a search engine
such Solr. This search engine will serve as the back-end for a web-based
The problem with pf2 is that it will return the document if it matches
loosely too and then I need to do a comparison to see whether the match was
a complete phrase match OR not before actually using the result. It would
become a 2 step process..
--
Sent from:
thank you
Erick Erickson 于2018年3月1日 周四23:40写道:
> Ant 1.10.1 works as well, it's a bug in ant...
>
> On Mar 1, 2018 06:27, "苗海泉" wrote:
>
> > thank you for reply,i'm try and everything is ok.
> >
> > 2018-03-01 22:06 GMT+08:00 thunderz.solr
Hi
Would a pf2 boost suit your needs? You would match loosely on any term, and
your results containing bigrams would be at the top.
HTH -- Rick
On March 1, 2018 11:54:19 AM EST, bbarani wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I want to do a complete "phrase contain" match.
>
>For ex: Value is
Joel, thanks for the pointers to the streaming feature. I had no idea solr
had that (and also just discovered the very intersting sql feature! I will
be sure to investigate that in more detail in the future).
However I'm having some trouble getting basic streaming functions working.
I've already
We are receiving an UnsupportedOperationException after making certain
requests. The requests themselves do not seem to be causing the issue as
when we run the job that makes these requests locally against the same
SolrCloud cluster where the errors are being thrown, there are no errors.
These
Thanks for your help.
Abhi
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Yes, either type “text_general” or some other TextField-based field type
> that includes a synonym filter.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Mar 1, 2018, at 3:02 PM, Abhi Basu
Yes, either type “text_general” or some other TextField-based field type that
includes a synonym filter.
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 3:02 PM, Abhi Basu <9000r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, agreed. Just tested and it works. :)
>
> I will have a lot more fields, so every
Yes, agreed. Just tested and it works. :)
I will have a lot more fields, so every field I need a synonym feature for
will have to be type "text_general", right?
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> I think you want type=“text_general”
>
> --
> Steve
>
I think you want type=“text_general”
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Abhi Basu <9000r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Should it be defined as this instead?
>
> stored="true" docValues="true"/>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Abhi Basu <9000r...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Erick. I found an older mailing list thread online where someone had
similar issues to what I was experiencing
(http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-delete-by-query-performance-td4206726.html
Should it be defined as this instead?
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Abhi Basu <9000r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What should PropertyAddressState type be in order to be caught into the
> text_general config below?
>
> I have remeoved the copyfield now.
>
> docValues="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
What should PropertyAddressState type be in order to be caught into the
text_general config below?
I have remeoved the copyfield now.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Hi Abhi,
>
>
Hi Abhi,
PropertyAddressState is of type “string”, which has no analysis applied.
Since you copyfield to “text” field, which has the analysis you expect, you
could try querying it instead.
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 12:23 PM, Abhi Basu <9000r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
I am testing the index analyzer first. Do I need to turn on the query
analyzer too?
synonyms.txt
Alabama, AL
Alaska, AK
Arizona, AZ
Arkansas, AR
California, CA
Colorado, CO
Connecticut, CT
Delaware, DE
Florida, FL
Georgia, GA
Hawaii, HI
Idaho, ID
Illinois, IL
Indiana, IN
Iowa, IA
etc ...
On
How's your synonyms declared in the file?
That xml comment () in the synonym filter section isn't there in
your running solr schema.xml, right? :)
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:53 PM Abhi Basu <9000r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes have tested with PA and NY, nothing works.
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at
Yes have tested with PA and NY, nothing works.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Alessandro Hoss wrote:
> Have you tested with another state?
>
> I'm asking because maybe solr is considering "OR" as a clause separator
> instead of a search term, and in this case the problem is
Have you tested with another state?
I'm asking because maybe solr is considering "OR" as a clause separator
instead of a search term, and in this case the problem is not with synonym,
it is with your query.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:24 PM Abhi Basu <9000r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone
Hello All,
I am running into frequent issue where the leader shard in solr cloud stays
active but does not acknowledge as "leader" . This brings down the other
replicas as they go into to recovery mode and eventually fail trying to
sync up.
The error seen in "solr.log" is below: { this also
Can someone please help me?
Schema.xml
Synonyms.txt has been populated with State abbreviations and names.
When searching for
PropertyAddressState:"Oregon", I do not find docs with "OR".
What am I missing?
Thanks,
Abhi
Hi,
I want to do a complete "phrase contain" match.
For ex: Value is stored as below in the multivalued field
1
transfer responsibility
transfer account
*Positive cases: (when it should return this document)*
searchTerms:how to transfer responsibility
searchTerms:show me ways to transfer
Ant 1.10.1 works as well, it's a bug in ant...
On Mar 1, 2018 06:27, "苗海泉" wrote:
> thank you for reply,i'm try and everything is ok.
>
> 2018-03-01 22:06 GMT+08:00 thunderz.solr :
>
> > 苗海泉 wrote
> > > I encountered a problem, when I was in the
Hi
I have two fields on which I have applied *ShingleFilterFactory*, when I am
searching against each field separately everything is working fine, but when
I try to combine two searches with an *OR* statement then I am getting wrong
results.
For an example
/FieldOne:(business analysts) I am
thank you for reply,i'm try and everything is ok.
2018-03-01 22:06 GMT+08:00 thunderz.solr :
> 苗海泉 wrote
> > I encountered a problem, when I was in the process of compiling solr6.0
> > source error, I have installed the ant and ivy, and then solr6 source
> code
> >
苗海泉 wrote
> I encountered a problem, when I was in the process of compiling solr6.0
> source error, I have installed the ant and ivy, and then solr6 source code
> catalog Executive eclipse ant eclipse would like to generate a project
> error as follows "
> Buildfile: D: \ solr-6.0.0-src \
I jstack through the analysis of our solr thread found that the total
number of threads 1169 of which 1037 threads are the wait state, the 1037
threads, there are two types of threads is very large, 486 threads with
same trace trace searcherExecutor-5694-thread -1,
searcherExecutor-5694-thread-1
Thank you for your advice on gc tools, what do you suggest to me?
2018-02-28 23:57 GMT+08:00 Shawn Heisey :
> On 2/28/2018 2:53 AM, 苗海泉 wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your detailed advice, the monitor product you are talking about
>> is good, but our solr system is running on a
33 matches
Mail list logo