Hi Guys,
I am new to the Solr world and I am using Solr 5.4.1. I have a question and
hope to find answer to the same.
Consider a SQL query as:
select A, sum(B), sum(C)
from Col1
where D = ‘Test’
group by A
*having sum(B) > 20*
order by A
limit 100
I am able to translate the above
Hi Guys,
I am new to the Solr world and I am using Solr 5.4.1. I have a question and
hope to find answer to the same.
Consider a SQL query as:
select A, sum(B), sum(C)
from Col1
where D = ‘Test’
group by A
having sum(B) > 20
order by A
limit 100
I am able to translate the above to Solr Query
Hi Guys,
I am new to the Solr world and I am using Solr 5.4.1. I have a question and
hope to find answer to the same.
Consider a SQL query as:
select A, sum(B), sum(C)
from Col1
where D = ‘Test’
group by A
*having sum(B) > 20*
order by A
limit 100
I am able to translate the above
Hi Erick,
In fact, stemming was the culprit for the problem.
Thanks!
Monique Monteiro
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:45 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Stemming is getting in the way here. You could probably use copyField
> to a field that doesn't stem and fuzzy search against that field
> rather than
I created a JIRA issue to track the Trie field removal effort:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12632
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Aug 7, 2018, at 11:48 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> On 8/6/2018 11:52 PM, Hendrik Haddorp wrote:
>> Below the table the following is stated:
>> /All
On 8/6/2018 11:18 AM, Steve Pruitt wrote:
> Changing the request handler to /suggest in the Admin Console Query panel
> doesn't work. It was a guess on my part to see if it would.
>
> Is the way to do this, or do I need to always use browser, postman, etc. for
> debugging?
I've never used the
On 8/6/2018 11:52 PM, Hendrik Haddorp wrote:
Below the table the following is stated:
/All Trie* numeric and date field types have been deprecated in favor
of *Point field types. Point field types are better at range queries
(speed, memory, disk), however simple field:value queries
Bjarke:
One thing, what version of Solr are you moving _from_ and _to_?
Solr/Lucene only guarantee one major backward revision so you can copy
an index created with Solr 6 to another Solr 6 or Solr 7, but you
couldn't copy an index created with Solr 5 to Solr 7...
Also note that shard splitting
Bjarke,
I am imagining that at some point you may need to shard that data if it grows.
Or do you imagine this data to remain stagnant?
Generally you want to add solrcloud to do two things : 1. Increase availability
with replicas 2. Increase available data via shards 3. Increase fault tolerance
Hi, i also got this running
https://github.com/freedev/solrcloud-zookeeper-kubernetes
My problem is also that instance 2 and 3 will not start. If i exec into
them, and run bin/solr start -cloud, then i can start them on another port
than 32080, but thats not what we want.
Is anyone having a
Thanks Erick, that indeed was the problem. All good now!
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Right, that seems like a way to go, will give it a try.
Thanks!
/Bjarke
2018-08-07 14:08 GMT+02:00 Markus Jelsma :
> Hello Bjarke,
>
> You can use shard splitting:
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/collections-
> api.html#CollectionsAPI-splitshard
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
>
>
>
Hello Bjarke,
You can use shard splitting:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/collections-api.html#CollectionsAPI-splitshard
Regards,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Bjarke Buur Mortensen
> Sent: Tuesday 7th August 2018 13:47
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re:
Thank you, that is of course a way to go, but I would actually like to be
able to shard ...
Could I use your approach and add shards dynamically?
2018-08-07 13:28 GMT+02:00 Markus Jelsma :
> Hello Bjarke,
>
> If you are not going to shard you can just create a 1 shard/1 replica
> collection,
Hello Bjarke,
If you are not going to shard you can just create a 1 shard/1 replica
collection, shut down Solr, copy the data directory into the replica's
directory and start up again.
Regards,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Bjarke Buur Mortensen
> Sent: Tuesday 7th August 2018
Hi List,
is there a cookbook recipe for moving an existing solr core to a solr cloud
collection.
We currently have a single machine with a large core (~150gb), and we would
like to move to solr cloud.
I haven't been able to find anything that reuses an existing index, so any
pointers much
facet.method=fc not facet.method=fsc are not, but facet.method=enum has a
chance to be stopped when timeAllowed is exceeded.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:40 AM Wei wrote:
> Thanks Mikhail! Is traditional facet subject to timeAllowed?
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
>
First of all thanks to all, its a great community and amazing experience to
work with Apache Solr.
I was trying to use highlight component inside suggest request handler by
mentioning highlight component like this:
suggest
highlight
So I can use suggestions and highlighter at the same time,
uniqueBlock is not faster than BlockJoinFacet in 7.4.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:05 AM Aditya Gandhi wrote:
> I'm querying an Index which has two types of child documents (let's call
> them ChildTypeA and ChildTypeB)
> I wrap the subqueries for each of these documents in a boolean clause,
>
Thanks Mikhail! Is traditional facet subject to timeAllowed?
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> One note: enum facets might be stopped by timeAllowed.
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 1:45 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> > Hello, Wei.
> >
> > "Document collection" is done along
20 matches
Mail list logo
