On 9/7/2018 7:44 PM, John Smith wrote:
Thanks Shawn, for your comments. The reason why I don't want to go flat
file structure, is due to all the wasted/duplicated data. If a department
has 100 employees, then it's very wasteful in terms of disk space to repeat
the header data over and over
Thanks Shawn, for your comments. The reason why I don't want to go flat
file structure, is due to all the wasted/duplicated data. If a department
has 100 employees, then it's very wasteful in terms of disk space to repeat
the header data over and over again, 100 times. In this example there is
On 9/7/2018 6:59 PM, dshih wrote:
Query:
/select?q={!q.op=AND}mysearchtext*=edismax=true
Result:
"querystring": "{!q.op=AND}mysearchtext*",
"parsedquery": "+DisjunctionMaxQuery(((Synonym(text:q
text:qopandmysearchtext text:{!q.op=and}mysearchtext*) text:op text:and
text:mysearchtext)))"
In the
On 9/7/2018 3:06 PM, John Smith wrote:
Hi, I have a document structure like this (this is a made up schema, my
data has nothing to do with departments and employees, but the structure
holds true to my real data):
department 1
employee 11
employee 12
employee 13
room 11
SOLR 7.4.0
Apologies if this has been answered, but I can't find the answer for the
life of me if it has been.
Query:
/select?q={!q.op=AND}mysearchtext*=edismax=true
Result:
"querystring": "{!q.op=AND}mysearchtext*",
"parsedquery": "+DisjunctionMaxQuery(((Synonym(text:q
text:qopandmysearchtext
Yeah, I am not sure about how the Authentication band aid feature will
work, the mentioned stackoverflow link. It is about time we include basic
authentication support in CDCR.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, 8:41 pm cdatta, wrote:
> Hi Amrit, Thanks for your response.
>
> We wiped out our complete
unregistered
Basic Authentication in clusters is not supported as of today in CDCR.
On Fri, 7 Sep 2018, 4:53 pm Mrityunjaya Pathak,
wrote:
> I have setup two solr cloud instances in two different Datacenters Target
> solr cloud machine is copy of source machine with basicAuth enabled on
> them. I am unable
Hi, I have a document structure like this (this is a made up schema, my
data has nothing to do with departments and employees, but the structure
holds true to my real data):
department 1
employee 11
employee 12
employee 13
room 11
room 12
room 13
department 2
employee
Actually, i found this after posting; (still if someone has more to offer,
please reply)
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_0/metrics-reporting.html#index-merge-metrics
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 12:13 PM Nawab Zada Asad Iqbal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does Solr expose a metric to find the number of
Hi,
Does Solr expose a metric to find the number of segment merges which are in
progress?
Thanks
Nawab
No. The solr i have is 6.6.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 10:51 AM Stephen Bianamara
wrote:
> I've gotten incorrect checksums when upgrading solr versions across the
> cluster. Or in other words, when indexing into a mixed version cluster. Are
> you running mixed versions by chance?
>
> On Fri, Sep 7,
Oh, indeed if you changed anything about the field definition and did
_not_ reindex everything from scratch your results are unreliable.
I'm overstating the case, but it'll do for now. For instance, your
facet counts should be find if you changed the stored parameter for
instance, but anything
If this is still a problem in master/7x then a JIRA is in order.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 7:40 AM Doug Turnbull
wrote:
>
> Looks like this is indeed a bug
>
> My colleague debugged this behavior and it turns out that Solr only
> requests id and score from the shards, and not the user-specified
On 9/6/2018 7:46 AM, Michael Aleythe, Sternwald wrote:
I'm trying to edit the log4j2 logging configuration for solr. The goal is to get a log
file in json format. I configured the the JSONLayout for this purpose inside the
rollingFile appender in the log4j2.xml. After this solr stops logging
On 9/6/2018 12:29 PM, nalsrini wrote:
Here is the error message I am getting:
https://screencast.com/t/XwEjA22jX
Alexandre covered things quite well. It looks like you're using an
invalid URL.
Your original message shows this code:
SolrClient client = new
On 9/7/2018 8:39 AM, Pavel Micka wrote:
I found on wiki (https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems#RAM) that
optimal amount of RAM for SOLR is equal to index size. This is lets say the
ideal case to have everything in memory.
I wrote that page.
We plan to have small installation
I've gotten incorrect checksums when upgrading solr versions across the
cluster. Or in other words, when indexing into a mixed version cluster. Are
you running mixed versions by chance?
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018, 6:07 AM Susheel Kumar wrote:
> Anyone has insight / have faced above errors ?
>
> On
Hi,
Which version of Solr are you using? AFAIK this was fixed in Solr 6.6:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10076 .
However, prior to Solr 7.0, sensitive property redaction was not enabled by
default. To enable, set system property solr.redaction.system.enabled=true .
--
Steve
Looks like this is indeed a bug
My colleague debugged this behavior and it turns out that Solr only
requests id and score from the shards, and not the user-specified field
list. You can see that on this line
Hi,
I found on wiki (https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems#RAM) that
optimal amount of RAM for SOLR is equal to index size. This is lets say the
ideal case to have everything in memory.
We plan to have small installation with 2 nodes and 8shards. We'll have inside
the cluster
Hi Susheel,
Thanks for your response. Well If I use plural also it is giving the same
results and the Solr is not finding the 2 different words that is in the same
page. I am trying to figure out how to pass the query to find the results while
doing multi word search in same page.
Thanks,
I have configured my solr instance to use ssl and it's working as expected.
However, the keystore password is being displayed when I access the Solr
Dashboard. Is there a way to hide this?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Anyone has insight / have faced above errors ?
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:04 PM Susheel Kumar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We had a running cluster with CDCR and there were some issues with
> indexing on Source cluster which got resolved after restarting the nodes
> (in my absence...) and now I see
And as you probably already checked, inserting the proper
*tokenizerFactory* also expands the right synonym line:
q = (body:"Cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase II" OR body:"EC 3.1.3.5")
parsedQuery = SpanOrQuery(spanOr([body:p49902, spanNear([body:cytosol,
body:purin, body:5, body:nucleotidas], 0,
I have setup two solr cloud instances in two different Datacenters Target solr
cloud machine is copy of source machine with basicAuth enabled on them. I am
unable to see any replication on target.
Solr Version :6.6.3
I have done config changes as suggested on
I have setup two solr cloud instances in two different Datacenters Target solr
cloud machine is copy of source machine with basicAuth enabled on them. I am
unable to see any replication on target.
Solr Version :6.6.3
I have done config changes as suggested on
Usually sharedlib is a path to a directory that contains .jar files, then
added to the Solr classpath.
For example I've used sharedlib to deploy a jar where is a the
implementation of a custom plugin for Solr that extends
ExtendedDismaxQParserPlugin.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM Andrea
Hi, please expand a bit. Specifically:
* what are those text files? Configuration files? You want something
like a central point where to manage things like stopwords, synonyms?
* I don't think the shareLib folder has been created for this usage.
However, please post the complete message
Hi,
I want to share a folder containing text files in solr among different
cores so if the folder is updated ,so it would reflect in all the cores
having path specified but the problem I am facing is that , i am using
sharedlib in solr.xml and specifying the default path there.And also I am
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for the insights.
I verified the points you mentioned,
Socket timeout defaults weren't changed.
Both nodes (two different hosts, windows OS ) are given heap space of 4GB. They
are having two Collections as of now.
One is without replicas but with 8 shards on each node.
One is
Hi,
We are in the process of upgrading Solr from solr 5.2.1 to solr 7.4.0 and I'm
facing below issues. Please help me in resolving.
1)HttpSolrClient tempClient = new
HttpSolrClient.Builder("http://localhost:8983/solr;).build();
Thanks Erick,
The field is defined as a pfloat.
I took your advice and tried smaller result range and the counts look good. I
might try an index rebuild I’m wondering if the data has somehow been corrupted
by a combination of old and new index mappings.
Thanks again for your assistance.
Hey,
I tried solr/server/lib/ext and solr/server/lib. I also tried without them but
it doesn't change anything.
Best regards
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Varun Thacker
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. September 2018 16:23
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Solr 7.4 and
34 matches
Mail list logo