Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Thanks, Jan. The issue is created here - https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/issues/289 On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:13 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I poked around a bit and ended up reading this thead > https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/320 < >

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

= AdoptOpenJDK > java.version = 11.0.4 > java.version.date = 2019-07-16 > java.vm.specification.vendor = Oracle Corporation > java.vm.specification.version = 11 > java.vm.vendor = AdoptOpenJDK > java.vm.version = 11.0.4+11 > os.version = 5.0.0-32-generic > openjdk

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

d90afb072284bce5f1715345c53c/8.4/Dockerfile > >> > >> which uses openjdk:11-stretch > >> > >> and looking up that is > >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/blob/1b6e2ef66a086f47315f5d05ecf7de3dae7413f2/11/jdk/Dock

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

safe-from-Oracle-Java-Licensing-fee > > > > > >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 3:45 PM Erick Erickson > > >> wrote: > >> > >> Why is it a no-go? It’s free too. > >> > >>> On Jan 31, 2020, at 12:31 AM, Arnold Bronley > >>

Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Hi, I use Solr docker images from https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/. It uses Oracle OpenJDK. It is a no go for where I work. What is the best way to replace this JDK with some other OpenJDK such as Amazon Corretto OpenJDK for my docker containers if I still want to use above images?

Solr 6.3 and OpenJDK 11

Hi, How much of a problem would it be if I use OpenJDK 11 with Solr 6.3. I am aware that the system requirements page for Solr mentions that 'You should avoid Java 9 or later for Lucene/Solr 6.x or earlier.' I am interested in knowing what sort functionalities would break in Solr if I try to use

QParser does not retain double quotes

Hi, I have following code that does some parsing with QParser plugin. I noticed that it does not retain the double quotes in the filterQueryString. How should make it retain the double quotes? QParser.getParser(filterQueryString, null, req).getQuery(); filterQueryString passed = id:"x:1234"

Re: BooleanQueryBuilder is not adding parenthesis around the query

as the key point I was missing. On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 2:40 PM Arnold Bronley wrote: > Thanks, Edaward. This was the exact answer I was looking for :) > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:08 PM Edward Ribeiro > wrote: > >> If you are using Lucene's BooleanQueryBuilder then yo

Re: BooleanQueryBuilder is not adding parenthesis around the query

build(), BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD); > builder.add(query3, BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD); > > BooleanQuery booleanQuery = builder.build(); > > This booleanQuery.toString() will be: > > (+text:toys +text:children) age:12 > > That is the parsing of "(text:child AND

BooleanQueryBuilder is not adding parenthesis around the query

Hi, BooleanQueryBuilder is not adding parenthesis around the query. It only adds + sign at the start of the query but not the parentheses around the query. Why is that? How should I add it? booleanQueryBuilder.add(query, BooleanClause.Occur.MUST)

Lucene query to Solr query

Hi, I have a Lucene query as following (toString represenation of Lucene's Query object): +(topics:29)^2 (topics:38)^3 +(-id:41135) It works fine when I am using it as a lucene query in SolrIndexSearcher.getDocList function. However, now I want to use it as a Solr query and query against a

SolrCloud upgrade concern

Hi, I am trying to upgrade my system from Solr master-slave architecture to SolrCloud architecture. Meanwhile, I stumbled upon this very negative post about SolrCloud. https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-Last-Message-to-the-Solr-Users-td4452980.html Given that it is from one of the initial

Re: remote debugging for docker solr

> foreground: > > command: > > bash -c "./myscript.sh& exec solr start -c -f -a > -agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=5005; " > > See that there's an 'exec' keyword between the script and the solr > launching command. > > Best, > Edwa

Re: remote debugging for docker solr

ocket,server=y,suspend=n,address=5005” > > The thing to look for in the logs is: solr1| Listening for transport > dt_socket at address: 5005 > > BTW, when looking at these sort of subtleties, it’s always useful to exec > into the container, and run `tr '\000' '\n' t

remote debugging for docker solr

Hi, I have a running dockerized instance of Solr which runs fine with the following setting for command option for solr service in docker-compose.yml file command: > bash -c "solr start -cloud -s /var/lib/solr -t /var/data/solr; set -x; export; wait-for-solr.sh;" Recently, I wanted

Re: Accessing other core in SolrCloud mode

e logic on SolrCloud is making it harder than it needs to be. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Jan 6, 2020, at 2:39 PM, Arnold Bronley > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have one custom Solr plugin that uses following logic to access some > > other core prese

Re: Does CloudMLTQParser support getting related documents from different shards?

f parsing the query and, in this > case > getting the relevant from the indicated document to add to the > query while doing some sanity checking. The bits that > distribute the query to shards and collate the results are elsewhere. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Jan 3, 20

Accessing other core in SolrCloud mode

Hi, I have one custom Solr plugin that uses following logic to access some other core present on the same Solr instance. request.getCore().getCoreContainer().getCore(otherCoreName) where request is an object of type SolrQueryRequest This works fine in master-slave mode. Now if try to use the

Does CloudMLTQParser support getting related documents from different shards?

Hi, I have one custom Solr plugin that uses MoreLikeThis class. AFAIK, MoreLikeThis handler does not support distributed mode and the issue is still open for that - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5480. However, I saw that there is some possibility to use CloudMLTQParser to work

Re: Solr Admin Console hangs on Chrome

I am also facing similar issue. I have also switched to other browsers to solve this issue. On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 2:22 PM Webster Homer < webster.ho...@milliporesigma.com> wrote: > It seems like the Solr Admin console has become slow when you use it on > the chrome browser. If I go to the

Indexing strategies for user profiles

Hi, I have a Solr collection 'products' for different products that users interact with. With MoreLikeThis, I can retrieve for a given product another related product. Now, I want to create a Solr collection for users such that I can use MoreLikeThis approach between users and products. Not just

How to update range of dynamic fields in Solr

Here is the detailed question in stack-overflow. Please help. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14280506/how-to-update-range-of-dynamic-fields-in-solr-4

Critical issue SOLR-13141

Hi, I am using Solr version 8.2.0 and I see that there is one critical JIRA issue open(link below) for CDCR. The issue does not mention anything about 8.2.0 but it says that it is fixed in 8.3.0. Does this mean that CDCR is not functional in Solr 8.2.0 and should I wait for 8.3.0 to be released?

Re: Reloading after creating a collection

Hi, I am not changing the the config to enable CDCR. I am just using the CDCR API to start it. Does that count as changing configuration? On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:20 PM Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 9/19/2019 9:36 AM, Arnold Bronley wrote: > > Why is it that I need to reload collectio

Reloading after creating a collection

Hi, Why is it that I need to reload collection after I created it? CDCR runs into issues if I do not do this.

OR and AND queries case sensitive in q param?

Hi, in Solr 6.3, I was able to use OR and AND operators in case insensitive manner. E.g. If I have two documents like following in my corpus: document 1: { id:1 author:rick } document 2: { id:2 author:morty } Then if I pass 'rick OR morty' to q param then I would get both documents back. I

Re: SolrClient from inside processAdd function

; } On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:40 PM Arnold Bronley wrote: > Hi Markus, > > "Depending on cloudMode we create new SolrClient instances based on these > classes. " > > But I still do not see SolrClient creation anywhere in your code snippet. > Am I missing somethin

Re: SolrClient from inside processAdd function

> > > From:Arnold Bronley > > > > Sent: Wednesday 4th September 2019 20:10 > > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: SolrClient from inside processAdd function > > > > > > > > I need to search some other collection

host and port for SolrTestCaseJ4 and EmbeddedSolrServer

Hi, In SolrTestCaseJ4 there is initCore function. After using this function how to know on which host and port the solr is running. Same goes for EmbeddedSolrServer? How to know on which port and host it is running?

Get host/port information for current Solr

Hi, is there a way to get host/port information for current Solr from inside custom Solr URP plugin? One way it to do use 'localhost:8983' but I feel little uncomfortable with such hardcoding of the port.

Re: SolrClient from inside processAdd function

the SolrClient > > > _for_? I suspect there’s an easier way to do this….. > > > > > > Best, > > > Erick > > > > > > > On Sep 3, 2019, at 6:17 PM, Arnold Bronley > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Is there a way to create SolrClient from inside processAdd function > for > > > > custom update processor for the same Solr on which it is executing? > > > > > > > > >

Atomic indexing as default indexing mode in Solr

Why atomic indexing is not the default mode of indexing in Solr? That way the ownership model of the content changes from document level to field level for clients. Multiple clients can participate in the contribution process of the same Solr document without overwriting each other.

Re: SolrClient from inside processAdd function

fields for indexing to incoming documents (and recall > discussing this with David Smiley), but eventually decided against this > approach on the grounds of complexity. > > -Simon > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:10 PM Arnold Bronley > wrote: > > > I need to search some other c

Re: SolrClient from inside processAdd function

to do this….. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Sep 3, 2019, at 6:17 PM, Arnold Bronley > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way to create SolrClient from inside processAdd function for > > custom update processor for the same Solr on which it is executing? > >

SolrClient from inside processAdd function

Hi, Is there a way to create SolrClient from inside processAdd function for custom update processor for the same Solr on which it is executing?

Re: req.getCore().getCoreContainer().getCore(core_name) is returning null - Solr 8.2.0

t; Andrea > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, 21:32 Arnold Bronley, > wrote: > > > @Andrea: I agree with you. Do you know if there is a way to initialize > > SolrCloudClient directly from some information that I get > > from SolrQueryRequest or from AddUpdateComm

Re: req.getCore().getCoreContainer().getCore(core_name) is returning null - Solr 8.2.0

it from > _collection_ B. Since you have the doc ID (presumably the ), > using get-by-id instead of a standard query will be very efficient. I can > imagine > under very heavy load this might introduce too much overhead, but it’s > where I’d start. > > Best, > Erick > > &

Re: req.getCore().getCoreContainer().getCore(core_name) is returning null - Solr 8.2.0

s case a CloudSolrClient) instead of dealing > with such low-level details? The actual location of the document you are > looking for would be completely abstracted. > > Best, > Andrea > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, 18:50 Arnold Bronley, > wrote: > > > So, here is the problem that

Re: req.getCore().getCoreContainer().getCore(core_name) is returning null - Solr 8.2.0

ed to get a core? What do you want to _do_ > with the doc that you need the core it resides in? > > Best, > Erick > > > On Aug 28, 2019, at 5:28 PM, Arnold Bronley > wrote: > > > > Wait, would I need to use core name like collection1_shard1_replica_n4 > >

Re: req.getCore().getCoreContainer().getCore(core_name) is returning null - Solr 8.2.0

information to be abstracted out that way. On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:13 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > Hmmm, should work. What is your core_name? There’s strings like > collection1_shard1_replica_n4 and core_node6. Are you sure you’re using the > right one? > > > On Aug 28, 2019, at 3:56

Re: Turn off CDCR for only selected target clusters

PM, Arnold Bronley wrote: > > I have configured the SolrCloud collection-wise only and there is no > other > > way. The way you have defined 3 zkHosts (comma separated values for > zkHost > > property), I tried that one before as it was more intuitive. But it did > not &

Re: 8.2.0 getting warning - unable to load jetty, not starting JettyAdminServer

ker log output). > > — Martijn > > > On 20 Aug 2019, at 19:26, Arnold Bronley > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am using 8.2.0-slim version. I wrap it in my own image by specifying > some > > additional settings in Dockerfile (all it does is speci

req.getCore().getCoreContainer().getCore(core_name) is returning null - Solr 8.2.0

Hi, In a custom Solr plugin code, req.getCore().getCoreContainer().getCore(core_name) is returning null even if core by name core_name is loaded and up in Solr. req is object of SolrQueryRequest class. I am using Solr 8.2.0 in SolrCloud mode. Any ideas on why this might be the case?

Re: Turn off CDCR for only selected target clusters

ctive for ZooKeeper instances really makes no sense > as the > point of ZK ensembles is to keep running even if one goes away. > > So can you rephrase the question? Or state the problem you’re trying to > solve another way? > > Best, > Erick > > > On Aug 13, 2019, at

Re: 8.2.0 getting warning - unable to load jetty, not starting JettyAdminServer

ch steps do you follow to run Solr docker? > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 1:25 AM Arnold Bronley > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am getting following warning in Solr admin UI logs. I did not get this > > warning in Solr 8.1.1

8.2.0 getting warning - unable to load jetty, not starting JettyAdminServer

Hi, I am getting following warning in Solr admin UI logs. I did not get this warning in Solr 8.1.1 Please note that I am using Solr docker slim image from here - https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/ Unable to load jetty, not starting JettyAdminServer

Turn off CDCR for only selected target clusters

Hi, Is there a way to turn off the CDCR for only selected target clusters. Say, I have a configuration like following. I have 3 target clusters targetZkHost1, targetZkHost2 and targetZkHost3. Is it possible to turn off the CDCR for targetZkHost2 and targetZkHost3 but keep it on for

Using custom scoring formula

Hi, I have a topic verctor calculated for each of the Solr document in a collection. Topic vector is calculated using LDA ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_Dirichlet_allocation). Now I want to return the similar document to a given document from this collection. I can simply use normalized

Solr 7.7.2 vs Solr 8.2.0

Hi, We are trying to decide whether we should upgrade to Solr 7.7.2 version or Solr 8.2.0 version. We are currently on Solr 6.3.0 version. On one hand 8.2.0 version feels like a good choice because it is the latest version. But then experience tells that initial versions usually have lot of bugs

getFields function in org.apache.lucene.document.Document class does not handle dynamic fields

Following is the definition of the getFields function in org.apache.lucene.document.Document class. As you can see, it can't handle the dynamic fields because dynamic fields have pattern like field_name_*, so the equals condition won't match in following function. Shouldn't we use matches

Re: CDCR one source multiple targets

, 2019 at 10:40 AM Arnold Bronley wrote: > I see a similar question asked but no answers there too. > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/CDCR-Replication-from-one-source-to-multiple-targets-td4308717.html > OP there is using multiple cdcr request handlers but in my case I am using > mul

Re: CDCR one source multiple targets

cannot use cdcr for one source- multiple target cluster situation. Can somebody please confirm whether this is even supported? On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:12 PM Arnold Bronley wrote: > Hi, > > is it possible to use CDCR with one source SolrCloud cluster and multiple > target SolrCloud clust

CDCR one source multiple targets

Hi, is it possible to use CDCR with one source SolrCloud cluster and multiple target SolrCloud clusters? I tried to edit the zkHost setting in source cluster's solrconfig file by adding multiple comma separated values for target zkhosts for multuple target clusters. But the CDCR replication

Re: Bidirectional CDCR not working

gard if you have already considered that in your configuration. > I had a lot of issues trying to figure out the issue when I realized that > it was a documentation error. > > Thanks > Nishant > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 2:54 PM Arnold Bronley wrote: > > > Configurati

Re: Bidirectional CDCR not working

Configuration is almost identical for both clusters in terms of cdcr except for zkHost parameter configuration. On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:45 PM Arnold Bronley wrote: > Exactly. I have it defined in both clusters. I am following the > instructions from here . > https://lucene.apache

Re: Bidirectional CDCR not working

m/in/sarkaramrit2 > Medium: https://medium.com/@sarkaramrit2 > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 1:03 AM Arnold Bronley > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I used unidirectional CDCR in SolrCloud (7.7.1) without any issues. But > > after setting up bidirectional cdcr confi

Re: ExactStatsCache not working for distributed IDF

; to the "fl" param -- if different (for a given doc) than the score > as reported in debug, then it's probably working as intended ... just a > little confusing in the debug output. > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:23 PM Arnold Bronley > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I

Bidirectional CDCR not working

Hi, I used unidirectional CDCR in SolrCloud (7.7.1) without any issues. But after setting up bidirectional cdcr configuration, I am not able to index a document. Following is the error that I am getting: Async exception during distributed update: Error from server at

ExactStatsCache not working for distributed IDF

Hi, I am using ExactStatsCache in SolrCloud (7.7.1) by adding following to solrconfig.xml file for all collections. I restarted and indexed the documents of all collections after this change just to be sure. However, when I do multi-collection query, the scores do not change before and after

Re: SolrCloud exclusive features

On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 7:07 PM Arnold Bronley wrote: > I am glad to learn that there are others in similar need. A list for > SolrCloud exclusive features will be really awesome. > Can any Solr devs please reply to this thread? > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:39

Re: SolrCloud exclusive features

loud mode and not in Solr master-slave mode? > > yes, and its annoying as there are features of solr cloud I do not like. > as far as a comprehensive list, that I do not know but would be interested > in one as well > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 5:07 PM Arnold Bronley > wrote: > >

SolrCloud exclusive features

Hi, Are there any features that are only exclusive to SolrCloud? e.g. when I am reading Streaming Expressions documentation, first sentence there says 'Streaming Expressions provide a simple yet powerful stream processing language for Solr Cloud.' So, does this mean that streaming expressions

Is there fl.encoder just like hl.encoder

hl.encoder escapes html characters in highlight text response except the highlight html characters that Solr uses. Is there something similar available for field text that we get back as response from Solr?

Re: Not able reproduce race condition issue to justify implementation of optimistic concurrency

Thanks for replying, Chris. 1) depending on the number of CPUs / load on your solr server, it's possible you're just getting lucky. it's hard to "prove" with a multithreaded test that concurrency bugs exist. - Agreed. However, between 200k total calls, race condition not happening even once - I

Not able reproduce race condition issue to justify implementation of optimistic concurrency

Hi, Before implementing optimistic concurrency solution, I had written one test case to check if two threads atomically writing two different fields (say f1 and f2) of the same document (say d) run into conflict or not. Thread t1 atomically writes counter c1 to field f1 of document d, commits and

Re: Judging the MoreLikeThis results for relevancy

Thanks for the reply, Alessandro. Can you please elaborate on a point "a document which has a score 50% of the original doc score, it doesn't mean it is 50% similar"? I did not understand this for two reasons: 1. In the end, we are calculating similarity score between documents when we are

Judging the MoreLikeThis results for relevancy

Hi, I am using MoreLikeThis handler to get related documents for a given document. To determine if I am getting good results or not, here is what I do: The same original document should be returned as a top match. If it is not, then there is some problem with the relevancy. Then, as same input

Re: Spellcheck collations results

Thanks for replying Alessandro. I am passing these parameters: q=polt=polt=json=true=true=7=true=true=true=3=3=true=0.72 On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:28 AM, alessandro.benedetti wrote: > Can you tell us the request parameters used for the spellcheck ? > > In particular

Spellcheck collations results

Hi, in a spellchecker call, if I don't get back collations object in the response, is it correct to assume that even if I create a query myself by joining the individually spell-corrected words in suggestions object in response, it will have 0 results? E.g. In the following spellchecker

Proximity search in spellcheck collation

Hi, Does Solr spellcheck collator consider proximity between words in multi-word search phrase? i.e. instead of returning spell suggestions by considering each individual word separately, does it consider them in group if the words occur together often? E.g. bll gats should return bill gates

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

Let me know if I should open a JIRA issue for this. Thanks. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Arnold Bronley <arnoldbron...@gmail.com> wrote: > I tried spellcheck.q=polt and q=tag:polt. I get collations, but they are > only for polt and not tag:polt. Because of that, the hits tha

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

I tried spellcheck.q=polt and q=tag:polt. I get collations, but they are only for polt and not tag:polt. Because of that, the hits that I get back are for frequency of plot and not frequency of tag:plot { "responseHeader": { "status": 0, "QTime": 20, "params": {

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

numFound": 7, "startOffset": 4, "endOffset": 9, "origFreq": 0, "suggestion": [ { "word": "plot", "freq": 5934 }, { "word": "port",

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

with spellcheck.q I don't get anything back at all. { "responseHeader": { "status": 0, "QTime": 10, "params": { "spellcheck.collateExtendedResults": "true", "spellcheck.q": "tag:polt", "indent": "true", "spellcheck": "true", "spellcheck.accuracy":

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

Thanks for replying. I tried spellcheck.q=polt and it does not help. Here is how the query looks like: http://solr:8983/solr/myapp/select?q=tag:polt=json=true=true=7=true=true=true=3=3=true One workaround I found was that if you pass in \ before polt i.e. tag:\polt then it works as expected and

spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

When 'polt' is passed as keyword, both suggestions and collations parameters are returned. But if I pass 'tag:polt' as search query then only suggestions parameter is returned. Is this a bug?

How to remove control characters in stored value at Solr side

I know I can apply PatternReplaceFilterFactory to remove control characters from indexed value. However, is it possible to do similar thing for stored value? Because of some control characters included in indexing request, Solr throws Illegal Character Exception.

origFreq/freq ratio for filtering spell-check suggestions

Hi Solr users, I can see there are some parameters that can help in controlling the trigger condition for spellcheck mechanism or filter the spell suggestions like maxQueryFrequency or thresholdTokenFrequency. I could not find a parameter that will filter the suggestions based on (origFreq/freq)