On 11/2/2018 5:00 PM, Wei wrote:
After a recent schema change, it takes almost 40 minutes to optimize the
index. The schema change is to enable docValues for all sort/facet fields,
which increase the index size from 12G to 14G. Before the change it only
takes 5 minutes to do the optimization.
On 11/2/2018 1:38 PM, Chuming Chen wrote:
I am running a Solr cloud 7.4 with 4 shards and 4 nodes (JVM "-Xms20g
-Xmx40g”), each shard has 32 million documents and 32Gbytes in size.
A 40GB heap is probably completely unnecessary for an index of that
size. Does each machine have one replica
On 11/2/2018 3:12 AM, Vadim Ivanov wrote:
It seems to me that issue related with:
- restart solr node
- rebalance leader
- reload collection
- reload core (Core admin is not forbidden but seems obsolete in SolrCloud)
In SolrCloud, CoreAdmin is an expert option. Many of the things that
the
On 10/29/2018 7:24 AM, Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
Actually the smallest server doesn't look bad in terms of performance,
it has been consistently better that the other ones (without
replication) which seems a bit strange (it should be about the same or
slightly worse, right?). I guess the memory
On 10/29/2018 8:56 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
The interval between when a commit happens and all the autowarm
queries are finished if 52 seconds for the filterCache. seen warming
that that long unless something's very unusual. I'd actually be very
surprised if you're really only firing 64
On 10/29/2018 7:40 AM, Zahra Aminolroaya wrote:
Thanks Alex. I want to have a query for atomic update with solrj like below:
On 10/26/2018 9:55 AM, Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
We have a SolrCloud setup with the following configuration:
I'm late to this party. You've gotten some good replies already. I
hope I can add something useful.
* 4 nodes (3x128GB RAM Intel Xeon E5-1650v2, 1x64GB RAM Intel Xeon
Followup:
I had a theory that Nicky tested, and I think what was observed confirms the
theory.
TL;DR:
In previous versions, I think there was a bug where the presence of boolean
operators caused edismax to ignore the mm parameter, and only rely on the
boolean operator(s).
After that bug got
On 10/23/2018 8:20 AM, Gauri Dhawan wrote:
I have been facing an issue for quite some time and haven't been able to
come to a solution as of yet. We are trying to implement search on our
platform and all our data is stored in Solr.
I have a field `description` which is the field where I have to
On 10/23/2018 7:15 AM, Daniel Carrasco wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your response.
We've already thought about that and doubled the instances. Just now for
every Solr instance we've 60GB of RAM (40GB configured on Solr), and a 16
Cores CPU. The entire Data can be stored on RAM and will not fill
On 10/22/2018 9:44 PM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
On 10/22/2018 6:15 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
autoSoftCommit is pretty aggressive . If your commits are taking 1-2 seconds or
les
well, some take minutes (re-index)!
Are you absolutely sure that you have commits taking that much time?
I'm
On 10/23/2018 9:31 AM, Fernando Otero wrote:
Hey all
I'm running some tests on Solr cloud (10 nodes, 3 shards, 3 replicas),
when I run the queries I end up seeing 7x traffic ( requests / minute) in
Newrelic.
Could it be that the internal communication between nodes is done through
HTTP
On 10/22/2018 7:32 PM, Susheel Kumar wrote:
Hi Shawn, you meant ZK GC log correct?
There was another potential cause I was thinking of, but when I got to
where I was going to list them in the previous message, I could not for
the life of me remember what the other one was.
I just
On 10/22/2018 7:32 PM, Susheel Kumar wrote:
Hi Shawn, you meant ZK GC log correct?
No, the GC log from Solr. A heap that's too small could happen to ZK as
well, but I would expect that problem more on the Solr side.
You could try increasing the heap size to see if that makes any
On 10/22/2018 1:26 PM, Chris Ulicny wrote:
There weren't any particular problems we ran into since the client that
makes the queries to multiple collections previously would query multiple
cores using the 'shards' parameter before we moved to solrcloud. We didn't
have any complicated sorting or
On 10/22/2018 3:31 PM, Susheel Kumar wrote:
Hello,
I am seeing "ZookeeperServer not running" WARM messages in zookeeper logs
which is causing the Solr client connections to timeout...
What could be the problem?
ZK: 3.4.10
Zookeeper.out
==
For help with the ZK server log, you'll need to
On 10/22/2018 3:26 PM, Dinesh Sundaram wrote:
Thanks Shawn for the reply, yes I do have some questions on the solr too.
can you please share the steps for solr side to integate the nutch or no
steps are needed in solr?
Since I have no idea what has to happen on the nutch side, I really
can't
On 10/22/2018 12:46 PM, Rathor, Piyush (US - Philadelphia) wrote:
We are storing data in solr. Please let me know on the following:
* How can we set a field as external id which can be used for update.
* What operation/ query needs to sent to update the same external id
record.
On 10/21/2018 11:10 PM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
For the UpdateRequests it is the "commitWithinMs"-parameter? To me
this parameter sounds like telling the solr-server I need to see this
data within "x ms". As we have autoCommit and autoSoftCommit
The commitWithin parameter is effectively
On 10/18/2018 6:17 AM, shreck wrote:
why remove "\solr\contrib\map-reduce" lib from solr6.6.1?
Those contrib modules were removed for two primary reasons:
* They are available elsewhere.
* The copy included with Solr was not being maintained.
See this issue:
On 10/21/2018 11:43 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
If I omit the core in the url upon creation of the SolrClient, where can I then
"indicate" the core?
You do it with the request, not with the client.
On 10/21/2018 10:13 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
Just upgrading from 6.6 to 7.5 and am now seeing many "Connection
evcitor"-threads which are all Thread.slee()ing ...
What's the stacktrace on those threads? If they're sleeping, then it's
unlikely that there's any real contribution to system
On 10/19/2018 7:57 AM, Roopa Rao wrote:
From the past few months there has been a steady increase in the Solr
response time in our application, yes there are enhancements and index size
increase.
How to approach this issue to find the root cause for this slow and
constant increase? What
On 10/18/2018 12:35 PM, Dinesh Sundaram wrote:
Can you please share the steps to integrate nutch 2.3.1 with solrcloud
7.1.0.
You will need to speak to the nutch project about how to configure their
software to interact with Solr. If you have questions about Solr
itself, we can answer those.
On 10/17/2018 5:06 PM, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
I tried to use constant score into qf parameter but I had an exception.
Is this normal? The qf parameter actually is something like this:
field1^3 field2^4 field3^5... etc.
You didn't actually say, but it sounds like you're trying to use
On 10/17/2018 5:36 AM, Zahra Aminolroaya wrote:
What would be the challenges that I will confront with as my schemaless
collection has some indexed documents in it?
If the schema itself (the file named managed-schema that you might be
renaming to schema.xml) hasn't changed, then the existing
On 10/17/2018 9:19 AM, Joseph Costello - F Reports wrote:
Any feedback from the group on the question below.
The question was will solr performing distance calculations (10,000++)
on the fly, perform faster than SQL query simply pulling
pre-calculated distance values directly from the
On 10/17/2018 7:19 AM, Tech Support wrote:
We need to implement "Solr" search engine with "Solr Cloud" in our
running/existing .NET Application (4.5 VS2012).
Is there any .NET client (recomended) with Solr Cloud operations.
We have tried with "SolrNet" .net client available in the GitHub
On 10/16/2018 6:04 AM, zoolette wrote:
We are today running under SOLR 6.6 on our production environnement.
On the end of august, i planned to upgrade SOLR to 7.4 (7.5 since that
moment) but I encounter some trouble.
Our master SOLR is replicated to a slave SOLR. I tried to upgrade the
replica
On 10/15/2018 1:30 PM, Dasarathi Minjur wrote:
We have a Hadoop cluster with Solr 6.3 running as service. After an OS
security patching, when the cluster was restarted, Solr Cloud is up
but the shards are down all the time. No specific messages in Solr.log
or console logs. Tried restarting
On 10/15/2018 11:00 AM, vishal ghugare wrote:
I have built Solr 7.4.0 with upgraded version (25.0-jre/26.0-jre) of guava
dependency.
When unit tests are run against solr with guava 25.0-jre or 26.0-jre, some
of the unit tests stall indefinitely and the testing never finishes up.
For example,
On 10/14/2018 10:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
The responses are collected by node so subsequent responses from the same
node overwrite previous responses. Definitely a bug. Please open an issue.
Done.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12867
Thanks,
Shawn
On 10/14/2018 9:31 PM, Sourav Moitra wrote:
My question does running separate zookeeper ensemble in the same boxes
provides any advantage over using the solr embedded zookeeper ?
The major disadvantage to having ZK embedded in Solr is this: If you
stop or restart the Solr process, part of
On 10/14/2018 6:25 PM, dami...@gmail.com wrote:
I had an issue with async backup on solr 6.5.1 reporting that the backup
was complete when clearly it was not. I was using 12 shards across 6 nodes.
I only noticed this issue when one shard was much larger than the others.
There were no answers
On 10/14/2018 6:32 AM, yasoobhaider wrote:
Memory Analyzer output:
One instance of "org.apache.solr.uninverting.FieldCacheImpl" loaded by
"org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppClassLoader @ 0x7f60f7b38658" occupies
61,234,712,560 (91.86%) bytes. The memory is accumulated in one instance of
On 10/12/2018 8:46 AM, root23 wrote:
We are having an issue where we are seeing latency in updates. We are on
solr 6.
The new documents are reflected right away but updates to existing document
take sometime from 30 seconds to couple of minutes.
This is some relevant things from our solrconfig.
On 10/12/2018 8:32 AM, root23 wrote:
We are on solr 6. and as per the documentation i think solr 6 uses
TieredMergePolicyFactory.
However we have not specified it in the following way
10
10
We still use 25. which i understand is not used
by TieredMergePolicyFactory.
Supplementing
I'm working on reproducing a problem reported via the IRC channel.
Started a test cloud with 7.5.0. Initially with two nodes, then again
with 3 nodes. Did this on Windows 10.
Command to create a collection:
bin\solr create -c test2 -shards 30 -replicationFactor 2
For these URLs, I dropped
On 10/11/2018 4:51 AM, yasoobhaider wrote:
Hi Shawn, thanks for the inputs.
I have uploaded the gc logs of one of the slaves here:
https://ufile.io/ecvag (should work till 18th Oct '18)
I uploaded the logs to gceasy as well and it says that the problem is
consecutive full GCs. According to the
On 10/11/2018 10:07 AM, Mikhail Ibraheem wrote:
Hi Erick,Thanks for your reply.No, we aren't using schemaless mode.
is not explicitly declared in our solrconfig.xml
Schemaless mode is not turned on by the schemaFactory config element.
The default configurations that Solr ships with have
On 10/11/2018 9:06 AM, Bisonti Mario wrote:
I startup tika server from command line:
java -jar /opt/tika/tika-server-1.19.1.jar
I configured, with ManifoldCF a connector to Solr.
When I start the ingest of pdf and .xls document, I see in the tika server:
so it seems that tika server process
On 10/10/2018 11:33 PM, Sourav Moitra wrote:
Hello Shawn,
Thanks for quick reply.
Where precisely are you seeing the 98% usage?
On the Solr web UI. Although the same Solr UI is reporting heap usage
to be below 1 GB.
Also I found that Solr Java is holding(VIRT) 8GB of total memory even
with
On 10/10/2018 10:08 PM, Sourav Moitra wrote:
We have a Solr server with 8gb of memory. We are using solr in cloud
mode, solr version is 7.5, Java version is Oracle Java 9 and settings
for Xmx and Xms value is 2g but we are observing that the RAM getting
used to 98% when doing indexing.
How can
On 10/1/2018 6:54 AM, Andreas Hubold wrote:
Is there some other way to configure an HTTP proxy, e.g. with
HttpSolrClient.Builder? I don't want to create an Apache HttpClient
instance myself but the builder from Solrj (HttpSolrClient.Builder).
Unless you want to wait for a fix for SOLR-12848,
On 10/7/2018 7:28 PM, Sourav Moitra wrote:
I am Solr newbie. I am trying to setup three servers running both
Zookeeper ensemble and Solr in cloud mode. Each server has 4 core and
16gb of RAM. To start with I have put Xmx value of 6144M to Zookeeper
and Xmx value of 2048 to Solr.We have created 3
On 10/5/2018 9:15 AM, Ganesh Sethuraman wrote:
I am not sure the logs and GC logs were evident from my previous mail.
Re-posting it here for your reference:
Here is the full Solr Log file (Note that it is in INFO mode):
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ganeshmailbox/har/master/SolrLogFile
Here
On 10/5/2018 7:24 AM, Timeka Cobb wrote:
Good morning! The Nutch community doesn't help much..the problem I notice
is where they say install Solr the first step create resources: the
basicconfig file does not exist at all in the Solr packet..I can't connect
because Solr is missing files that are
On 10/5/2018 4:41 AM, padmanabhan1616 wrote:
1. We cannot upgrade directly from 5.x to 7.x instead upgrade to 5.5 then
upgrade to 7 as there is major index format level changes taken place in 5.5
or later version.
Solr 7.x cannot read indexes from 5.5. It can only read indexes that
were
On 10/5/2018 5:15 AM, Ganesh Sethuraman wrote:
1. Does GC and Solr Logs help to why the Solr replicas server continues to
be in the recovering/ state? Our assumption is that Sept 17 16:00 hrs we
had done ZK transaction log reading, that might have caused the issue. Is
that correct?
2. Does this
On 10/4/2018 7:10 AM, Greenhorn Techie wrote:
We have a requirement where we need to perform a group query in Solr where
results are grouped by user-name (which is a field in our indexes) . We
then need to filter the results based on numFound response parameter
present under each group. In
On 10/4/2018 12:30 AM, lala wrote:
Hi,
I am using:
Solr: 7.4
OS: windows7
I start solr using a service on startup.
In that case, I really have no idea where anything is on your system.
There is no service installation from the Solr project for Windows --
either you obtained that from
On 10/3/2018 3:17 PM, Pure Host - Wolfgang Freudenberger wrote:
Is there any way to migrate cores from 4.10.2 to 7.5.0? I guess not,
but perhaps someone has an idea. ^^
In a word, no. A specific major version of Solr is only guaranteed to
read indexes built and managed *completely* by the
On 10/3/2018 8:01 AM, yasoobhaider wrote:
Master and slave config:
ram: 120GB
cores: 16
At any point there are between 10-20 slaves in the cluster, each serving ~2k
requests per minute. Each slave houses two collections of approx 10G
(~2.5mil docs) and 2G(10mil docs) when optimized.
I am
On 10/3/2018 10:45 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
Here's one way to do this:
Oh, and when you delete the data directory, delete the tlog directory
too. Don't copy tlog from the non-cloud install. Solr will re-create
it as long as the directory gives it permission to do so.
Thanks,
Shawn
On 10/3/2018 9:42 AM, Jack Schlederer wrote:
I've successfully upgraded the Lucene 5 index to Lucene 6, and then to Lucene 7,
Upgrading through two major versions is not guaranteed to work.
Upgrading from an index fully built by major version X-1 is supported,
but if X-2 or earlier has EVER
On 10/3/2018 6:17 AM, Jason Gerlowski wrote:
NamedList respNL = response.getResponse();
NamedList metrics = (NamedList)respNL.get("metrics");
NamedList jvmMetrics = (NamedList)
metrics.get("solr.jvm");
Long numClassesLoaded = (Long)
On 10/2/2018 10:49 PM, lala wrote:
Shawn Heisey-2 wrote
With a change to the log4j configuration file, you can direct all logs
created by the DIH classes to a separate file, no code changes needed.
Since I'm a newbee regarding log4j, Can you please give me an example about
how to change
On 10/2/2018 8:55 PM, Ganesh Sethuraman wrote:
We are using 2 node SolrCloud 7.2.1 cluster with external 3 node ZK
ensemble in AWS. There are about 60 collections at any point in time. We
have per JVM max heap of 8GB.
Let's focus for right now on a single Solr machine, rather than the
whole
On 10/2/2018 9:33 AM, Rekha wrote:
Dear Solr Team, I need following clarification from you, please check and give
suggestion to me, 1. I want to store and search 200 Billions of documents(Each
document contains 16 fields). For my case can I able to achieve by using Solr
cloud? 2. For my case
On 10/2/2018 9:11 AM, Chuck Reynolds wrote:
Until we move to Solr 7.5 is there a way that we can control sharding with the
core.properties file?
It seems to me that you use to be able to put a core.properties file in the
Solr home path with something like the following.
On 10/2/2018 3:33 AM, lala wrote:
I know tha Solr logs the dih operations (& most of other operations) in
server\logs\solr.log file. What I want is to configure the dih requests to
be logged in another path, with another name if it's possible.
DIH doesn't make its own logfile. Just like the
On 10/2/2018 5:03 AM, Tamás Barta wrote:
Thank you for the answers!
Is it possible to get the facet result and the search results with only one
query? Or I have to send two queries for the Solr (one for search results
and one for facets)?
It only requires one query. You just add facet
On 10/2/2018 4:55 AM, Tamás Barta wrote:
I have been using Solr for a while for an online web store. After search a
filter box appears where user can filter results by many attributes. My
question is how can I do it with Solr that he filter box show only
available options based on result. For
On 10/1/2018 11:49 AM, Michael B. Klein wrote:
Then I try my experiment.
1) I bring up a 4th node (.4) and wait for it to join the cluster. I now
see .1, .2, .3, and .4 in live_nodes, and .1, .2, and .3 on the graph,
still as expected.
2) I kill .2. Predictably, it falls off the list of
On 10/1/2018 7:36 AM, Li, Yi wrote:
cursorMark appears as something like
AoE/E2Zhdm9yaXRlUGxhY2UvZjg1MzMzYzEtYzQ0NC00Y2ZiLWFmZDctMzcyODFhMDdiMGY3
and the document says it is “Base64 encoded serialized representation of the
sort values encapsulated by this object”
I like to know if I can
On 9/30/2018 10:14 PM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi wrote:
I am looking for the way to create CJK bigram tokens with ClassicTokenizer.
I tried this by using CJKBigramFilter, but it only supports for
StandardTokenizer...
CJKBigramFilter shouldn't care what tokenizer you're using. It should
work with
On 9/29/2018 3:08 AM, Ryan Qin wrote:
I’m working on a project which uses solr as search engine. I found I
cannot get the root cause of error from SolrJ.
CloudSolrClient uses LBHttpSolrClient internally. This client has a
tendency to wrap all exceptions in the "No live SolrServers" message.
On 9/28/2018 8:11 PM, sgaron cse wrote:
@Shawn
We're running two instance on one machine for two reason:
1. The box has plenty of resources (48 cores / 256GB ram) and since I was
reading that it's not recommended to use more than 31GB of heap in SOLR we
figured 96 GB for keeping index data in OS
On 9/28/2018 4:18 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I thought someone recently mentioned (but I cannot find a reference,
sorry) that Solr would automatically restart if an OutOfMemoryError
was encountered.
Is that only for single-note Solr (i.e. non-cloud/ZK)?
On non-windows systems, Solr
On 9/28/2018 6:09 AM, sgaron cse wrote:
because this is a test deployment replica is set to 1 so as far as I
understand, data will not be replicated for this core. Basically we have
two SOLR instances running on the same box. One on port 8983, the other on
port 8984. We have 9 cores on this SOLR
On 9/25/2018 2:14 PM, Hanjan, Harinder wrote:
Hello!
When starting a new topic on the mailing list, do not reply to an
existing message. Your thread is buried within a thread originally
titled "Extracting top level URL when indexing document".
On 9/27/2018 11:48 AM, sgaron cse wrote:
So this is a SOLR core where we keep configuration data so it is almost
never written to. The statistics for the core say its been last modified 4
hours ago, yet I got doc:null from the API an hour ago. And also you don't
have to have a lot of data into
On 9/27/2018 8:53 AM, Balanathagiri Ayyasamypalanivel wrote:
Thanks Shawn for your prompt response.
Actually we have to filter on the query time while calculate the score.
The challenge here is we should not add the asset and put as static field
in the index time. The asset needs to be
On 9/26/2018 12:46 PM, Balanathagiri Ayyasamypalanivel wrote:
But only draw back here is we have to parse the json to do the sum of the
values, is there any other way to handle this scenario.
Solr cannot do that for you. You could put this in your indexing
software -- add up the numbers and
On 9/27/2018 8:00 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 9/27/2018 7:24 AM, Kimber, Mike wrote:
I'm trying to determine if there is any health check available to
determine the above and then if the issue happens then an automated
mechanism in SolrCloud to restart the instance. Or is this something
we
On 9/27/2018 7:24 AM, Kimber, Mike wrote:
I'm trying to determine if there is any health check available to determine the
above and then if the issue happens then an automated mechanism in SolrCloud to
restart the instance. Or is this something we have to code ourselves?
As shipped by the
On 9/26/2018 2:39 PM, Terry Steichen wrote:
Let me try to clarify a bit - I'm just using bin/post to index the files
in a directory. That indexing process produces a lengthy screen display
of files that were indexed. (I realize this isn't production-quality,
but I'm not ready for production
On 9/26/2018 10:39 PM, Rathor, Piyush (US - Philadelphia) wrote:
We are facing some issues in search with special characters. Can you please
help in query if the search is done using following characters:
• “&”
• AND
• (
• )
There are two ways.
On 9/26/2018 2:39 PM, Terry Steichen wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, I'm not using SolrJ at all. Just
Solr-out-of-the-box. In this case, if I understand you below, it
"should indicate an error status"
I think you'd know if you were using SolrJ directly. You'd have written
the indexing
On 9/26/2018 1:23 PM, Terry Steichen wrote:
I'm pretty sure this was covered earlier. But I can't find references
to it. The question is how to make indexing errors clear and obvious.
If there's an indexing error and you're NOT using the concurrent client
in SolrJ, the response that Solr
On 9/26/2018 12:20 PM, Balanathagiri Ayyasamypalanivel wrote:
Currently I am storing json object type of values in string field in solr.
Using this field, in the code I am parsing json objects and doing sum of
the values under it.
In solr, do we have any option in doing it by default when using
On 9/26/2018 9:35 AM, Jeff Courtade wrote:
My concern with using g1 is solely based on finding this.
Does anyone have any information on this?
https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/JavaBugs#Oracle_Java_.2F_Sun_Java_.2F_OpenJDK_Bugs
I have never had a single problem with Solr running with the G1
On 9/26/2018 9:45 AM, Jeff Courtade wrote:
We are considering a move to solr 7.x my question is Must we use cloud? We
currently do not and all is well. It seems all work is done referencing
cloud implementations.
You do not have to use cloud.
For most people who are starting from scratch, I
On 9/25/2018 9:21 AM, Chuck Reynolds wrote:
Each server has three instances of Solr running on it so every instance on the
server has to be in the same replica set.
You should be running exactly one Solr instance per server. When
evaluating rules for replica placement, SolrCloud will treat
On 9/24/2018 3:43 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
Thanks for taking a look. My indexes are on HDFS. And I configured all the
solr parameters for that. The "shard page" is when I click on a SOLR server
to go to the UI, then in the dropdown on the left I select a shard (a
leader one), then I click
On 9/24/2018 2:05 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
I'm running a fairly old version of SOLR (4.x) and I found the metrics on
the shard page. However, sometimes there is numbers, sometimes it's all 0.
Just hitting the refresh button shows this.
I'm aware of
On 9/24/2018 9:28 AM, Michael Joyner wrote:
Is there an easy way to compare schemas?
When upgrading nodes, we are wanting to compare the "core" and
"automatically mapped" data types between our existing schema and the
new manage-schema available as part of the upgraded distrubtion.
There is
On 9/22/2018 11:21 PM, Timeka Cobb wrote:
Hello there, hope all is well! I just installed both Nutch and Solr onto a
Linux/Ubuntu sytems and trying to connect them through the nutch core. I
notice in the wiki it said that Nutch 1.15 is compatible to Solr 7.3.0 but
I installed Solr 7.4.0. How do
On 9/21/2018 2:07 PM, Chuck Reynolds wrote:
I'm using Solr 6.6 and I want to create a 90 node cluster with a replication
factor of three. I'm using AWS EC2 instances and I have a requirement to
replicate the data into 3 AWS availability zones.
So 30 servers in each zone and I don't see a
On 9/21/2018 1:23 PM, tedsolr wrote:
My application environment runs java 1.8. However I'm stuck building to 1.7
for now. I can still use SolrJ 6.1 in my app as long as I only deploy the
SolrJ JAR and not build it from source. Right?
If you can get your code to build while targeting 1.7, I
On 9/21/2018 10:31 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
For those interested, it looks like I was naïvely using
BasicHttpClientConnectionManager, which is totally inappropriate in a
multi-user threaded environment.
I switched to PooledHttpClientConnectionManager and that seems to be
working much
On 9/20/2018 1:13 PM, tedsolr wrote:
I realize that a java 8 runtime environment is required for Solr 6.x. Is it
also necessary to compile to java 8 for any custom plugins running on the
solr server? What about including SolrJ libraries in client code that is
still compiling to 1.7?
SolrJ
On 9/20/2018 9:32 AM, Schaum Mallik wrote:
‘Then use "bin/solr zk rm" to get rid of it from ZK.‘ <— can you give the
full command for this one if you don’t mind
Before doing this, try what I suggested. I am not sure that you need to
mess with what you have in ZK.
If you have
On 9/20/2018 9:25 AM, Schaum Mallik wrote:
ok so that’s the problem. The core.properties in the replicas under
/opt/solr/server/solr. So if I remove the file from all the replica folders
and also move the directories under /opt/solr/server/solr/configsets to
some backup location and restart this
On 9/20/2018 9:13 AM, Schaum Mallik wrote:
In response to this mistake that I did of keeping the core.properties in
the configuration directory when it was uploaded to zookeeper, how should I
go about fixing it?
A core.properties file in the config in ZK will not cause any problems.
It
On 9/20/2018 8:59 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I just completed a test where I did that exact sequence of converting
a node from non-cloud with existing indexes to cloud, and ran into the
exact same errors you're seeing. I can relay exact details of the
test if required.
Here's what I did
On 9/20/2018 8:44 AM, Schaum Mallik wrote:
Thank you for your detailed responses. I am still kind of confused though.
Just to give you some more insight. When I first created the cloud I
created to collections and the ‘-d’ option pointed to the directory where
the config for the collection was
On 9/20/2018 8:22 AM, Schaum Mallik wrote:
Thanks for the response Shawn.
My follow up question is how would the zookeeper ensemble know that the
location of the indexes has changed? Also do I need to apply the same
changes to the other 2 solr nodes which are working fine?
This move is not to
On 9/20/2018 6:02 AM, Schaum Mallik wrote:
Yeah my indexes, read and write works fine on the other two solr nodes.
Since I have this setup running in prod currently what are the steps you
will advice I take to resolve this issue. Starting from scratch is really
not an option since it will
On 9/20/2018 4:10 AM, Srinivas Kashyap wrote:
I'm having problem in setting up SQL server data import handler for Jetty
container.
Why not just define the datasource directly in the DIH config?
One reason I can think of why you might not want that is that you don't
want people to be able to
601 - 700 of 5391 matches
Mail list logo
